Literature DB >> 24002519

Multicenter randomized trial of centralized nurse-led telephone-based care coordination to improve outcomes after surgical resection for colorectal cancer: the CONNECT intervention.

Jane M Young1, Phyllis N Butow, Jennifer Walsh, Ivana Durcinoska, Timothy A Dobbins, Laura Rodwell, James D Harrison, Kate White, Andrew Gilmore, Bruce Hodge, Henry Hicks, Stephen Smith, Geoff O'Connor, Christopher M Byrne, Alan P Meagher, Stephen Jancewicz, Andrew Sutherland, Grahame Ctercteko, Nimalan Pathma-Nathan, Austin Curtin, David Townend, Ned S Abraham, Greg Longfield, David Rangiah, Christopher J Young, Anthony Eyers, Peter Lee, Dean Fisher, Michael J Solomon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effectiveness of a centralized, nurse-delivered telephone-based service to improve care coordination and patient-reported outcomes after surgery for colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a newly diagnosed colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to the CONNECT intervention or usual care. Intervention-group patients received standardized calls from the centrally based nurse 3 and 10 days and 1, 3, and 6 months after discharge from hospital. Unmet supportive care needs, experience of care coordination, unplanned readmissions, emergency department presentations, distress, and quality of life (QOL) were assessed by questionnaire at 1, 3, and 6 months.
RESULTS: Of 775 patients treated at 23 public and private hospitals in Australia, 387 were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 369 to the control group. There were no significant differences between groups in unmet supportive care needs, but these were consistently low in both groups at both follow-up time points. There were no differences between the groups in emergency department presentations (10.8% v 13.8%; P = .2) or unplanned hospital readmissions (8.6% v 10.5%; P = .4) at 1 month. By 6 months, 25.6% of intervention-group patients had reported an unplanned readmission compared with 27.9% of controls (P = .5). There were no significant differences in experience of care coordination, distress, or QOL between groups at any follow-up time point.
CONCLUSION: This trial failed to demonstrate substantial benefit of a centralized system to provide standardized, telephone follow-up for postoperative patients with colorectal cancer. Future interventions could investigate a more tailored approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24002519     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.1036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  17 in total

Review 1.  Multicomponent Palliative Care Interventions in Advanced Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Veerawat Phongtankuel; Lauren Meador; Ronald D Adelman; Jordan Roberts; Charles R Henderson; Sonal S Mehta; Tessa Del Carmen; M C Reid
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Follow-up postoperative calls to reduce common postoperative complaints among urogynecology patients.

Authors:  Christopher Iwanoff; Maria Giannopoulos; Charbel Salamon
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Palliative Care in Surgery: Defining the Research Priorities.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Lilley; Zara Cooper; Margaret L Schwarze; Anne C Mosenthal
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Innovations in research and clinical care using patient-generated health data.

Authors:  Heather S L Jim; Aasha I Hoogland; Naomi C Brownstein; Anna Barata; Adam P Dicker; Hans Knoop; Brian D Gonzalez; Randa Perkins; Dana Rollison; Scott M Gilbert; Ronica Nanda; Anders Berglund; Ross Mitchell; Peter A S Johnstone
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Improving psychosocial outcomes for caregivers of people with poor prognosis gastrointestinal cancers: a randomized controlled trial (Family Connect).

Authors:  Joanne M Shaw; Jane M Young; Phyllis N Butow; Tim Badgery-Parker; Ivana Durcinoska; James D Harrison; Patricia M Davidson; David Martin; Charbel Sandroussi; Michael Hollands; David Joseph; Amitabha Das; Vincent Lam; Emma Johnston; Michael J Solomon
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Early palliative care for adults with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Markus W Haun; Stephanie Estel; Gerta Rücker; Hans-Christoph Friederich; Matthias Villalobos; Michael Thomas; Mechthild Hartmann
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-12

7.  Effectiveness of care transition strategies for colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Letícia Flores Trindade; Julia Estela Willrich Boell; Elisiane Lorenzini; Wilson Cañon Montañez; Michelle Malkiewiez; Edith Pituskin; Adriane Cristina Bernat Kolankiewicz
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.359

Review 8.  A systematic review of psychosocial interventions for colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Catherine E Mosher; Joseph G Winger; Barbara A Given; Safi Shahda; Paul R Helft
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Readmission predicts 90-day mortality after esophagectomy: Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registry linked to Medicare outcomes.

Authors:  Yinin Hu; Timothy L McMurry; George J Stukenborg; Benjamin D Kozower
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Follow-up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors.

Authors:  Beverley L Høeg; Pernille E Bidstrup; Randi V Karlsen; Anne Sofie Friberg; Vanna Albieri; Susanne O Dalton; Lena Saltbæk; Klaus Kaae Andersen; Trine Allerslev Horsboel; Christoffer Johansen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.