Dana E Rathkopf1, Michael J Morris, Josef J Fox, Daniel C Danila, Susan F Slovin, Jeffrey H Hager, Peter J Rix, Edna Chow Maneval, Isan Chen, Mithat Gönen, Martin Fleisher, Steven M Larson, Charles L Sawyers, Howard I Scher. 1. Dana E. Rathkopf, Michael J. Morris, Josef J. Fox, Daniel C. Danila, Susan F. Slovin, Mithat Gönen, Martin Fleisher, Steven M. Larson, Charles L. Sawyers, and Howard I. Scher, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Dana E. Rathkopf, Michael J. Morris, Josef J. Fox, Daniel C. Danila, Susan F. Slovin, Steven M. Larson, and Howard I. Scher, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Jeffrey H. Hager, Peter J. Rix, Edna Chow Maneval, and Isan Chen, Aragon Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA; and Charles L. Sawyers, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD.
Abstract
PURPOSE: ARN-509 is a novel androgen receptor (AR) antagonist for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). ARN-509 inhibits AR nuclear translocation and AR binding to androgen response elements and, unlike bicalutamide, does not exhibit agonist properties in the context of AR overexpression. This first-in-human phase I study assessed safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of ARN-509 in men with metastatic CRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with progressive CRPC received continuous daily oral ARN-509 at doses between 30 and 480 mg, preceded by administration of a single dose followed by a 1-week observation period with pharmacokinetic sampling. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging was conducted to monitor [(18)F]fluoro-α-dihydrotestosterone (FDHT) binding to AR in tumors before and during treatment. Primary objective was to determine pharmacokinetics, safety, and recommended phase II dose. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetics were linear and dose proportional. Prostate-specific antigen declines at 12 weeks (≥ 50% reduction from baseline) were observed in 46.7% of patients. Reduction in FDHT uptake was observed at all doses, with a plateau in response at ≥ 120-mg dose, consistent with saturation of AR binding. The most frequently reported adverse event was grade 1/2 fatigue (47%). One dose-limiting toxicity event (grade 3 abdominal pain) occurred at the 300-mg dose. Dose escalation to 480 mg did not identify a maximum-tolerated dose. CONCLUSION: ARN-509 was safe and well tolerated, displayed dose-proportional pharmacokinetics, and demonstrated pharmacodynamic and antitumor activity across all dose levels tested. A maximum efficacious dose of 240 mg daily was selected for phase II exploration based on integration of preclinical and clinical data.
PURPOSE:ARN-509 is a novel androgen receptor (AR) antagonist for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). ARN-509 inhibits AR nuclear translocation and AR binding to androgen response elements and, unlike bicalutamide, does not exhibit agonist properties in the context of AR overexpression. This first-in-human phase I study assessed safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of ARN-509 in men with metastatic CRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with progressive CRPC received continuous daily oral ARN-509 at doses between 30 and 480 mg, preceded by administration of a single dose followed by a 1-week observation period with pharmacokinetic sampling. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging was conducted to monitor [(18)F]fluoro-α-dihydrotestosterone (FDHT) binding to AR in tumors before and during treatment. Primary objective was to determine pharmacokinetics, safety, and recommended phase II dose. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetics were linear and dose proportional. Prostate-specific antigen declines at 12 weeks (≥ 50% reduction from baseline) were observed in 46.7% of patients. Reduction in FDHT uptake was observed at all doses, with a plateau in response at ≥ 120-mg dose, consistent with saturation of AR binding. The most frequently reported adverse event was grade 1/2 fatigue (47%). One dose-limiting toxicity event (grade 3 abdominal pain) occurred at the 300-mg dose. Dose escalation to 480 mg did not identify a maximum-tolerated dose. CONCLUSION:ARN-509 was safe and well tolerated, displayed dose-proportional pharmacokinetics, and demonstrated pharmacodynamic and antitumor activity across all dose levels tested. A maximum efficacious dose of 240 mg daily was selected for phase II exploration based on integration of preclinical and clinical data.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Daniel C Danila; Glenn Heller; Gretchen A Gignac; Rita Gonzalez-Espinoza; Aseem Anand; Erika Tanaka; Hans Lilja; Lawrence Schwartz; Steven Larson; Martin Fleisher; Howard I Scher Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-12-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Farrokh Dehdashti; Joel Picus; Jeff M Michalski; Carmen S Dence; Barry A Siegel; John A Katzenellenbogen; Michael J Welch Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2005-02-22 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Michael E Jung; Samedy Ouk; Dongwon Yoo; Charles L Sawyers; Charlie Chen; Chris Tran; John Wongvipat Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Howard I Scher; Tomasz M Beer; Celestia S Higano; Aseem Anand; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Eleni Efstathiou; Dana Rathkopf; Julia Shelkey; Evan Y Yu; Joshi Alumkal; David Hung; Mohammad Hirmand; Lynn Seely; Michael J Morris; Daniel C Danila; John Humm; Steve Larson; Martin Fleisher; Charles L Sawyers Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-04-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Howard I Scher; Karim Fizazi; Fred Saad; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Cora N Sternberg; Kurt Miller; Ronald de Wit; Peter Mulders; Kim N Chi; Neal D Shore; Andrew J Armstrong; Thomas W Flaig; Aude Fléchon; Paul Mainwaring; Mark Fleming; John D Hainsworth; Mohammad Hirmand; Bryan Selby; Lynn Seely; Johann S de Bono Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-08-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Pat B Zanzonico; Ronald Finn; Keith S Pentlow; Yusuf Erdi; Bradley Beattie; Timothy Akhurst; Olivia Squire; Michael Morris; Howard Scher; Timothy McCarthy; Michael Welch; Steven M Larson; John L Humm Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Bradley J Beattie; Peter M Smith-Jones; Yuliya S Jhanwar; Heiko Schöder; C Ross Schmidtlein; Michael J Morris; Pat Zanzonico; Olivia Squire; Gustavo S P Meirelles; Ron Finn; Mohammad Namavari; Shangde Cai; Howard I Scher; Steven M Larson; John L Humm Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Steven M Larson; Michael Morris; Ilonka Gunther; Brad Beattie; John L Humm; Timothy A Akhurst; Ronald D Finn; Yusuf Erdi; Keith Pentlow; Jon Dyke; Olivia Squire; William Bornmann; Timothy McCarthy; Michael Welch; Howard Scher Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Howard I Scher; Susan Halabi; Ian Tannock; Michael Morris; Cora N Sternberg; Michael A Carducci; Mario A Eisenberger; Celestia Higano; Glenn J Bubley; Robert Dreicer; Daniel Petrylak; Philip Kantoff; Ethan Basch; William Kevin Kelly; William D Figg; Eric J Small; Tomasz M Beer; George Wilding; Alison Martin; Maha Hussain Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Tracy Proverbs-Singh; Jarett L Feldman; Michael J Morris; Karen A Autio; Tiffany A Traina Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: Hebert Alberto Vargas; Gem M Kramer; Andrew M Scott; Andrew Weickhardt; Andreas A Meier; Nicole Parada; Bradley J Beattie; John L Humm; Kevin D Staton; Pat B Zanzonico; Serge K Lyashchenko; Jason S Lewis; Maqsood Yaqub; Ramon E Sosa; Alfons J van den Eertwegh; Ian D Davis; Uwe Ackermann; Kunthi Pathmaraj; Robert C Schuit; Albert D Windhorst; Sue Chua; Wolfgang A Weber; Steven M Larson; Howard I Scher; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Otto S Hoekstra; Michael J Morris Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Dana E Rathkopf; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Neal D Shore; Ronald F Tutrone; Joshi J Alumkal; Charles J Ryan; Mansoor Saleh; Ralph J Hauke; Rajesh Bandekar; Edna Chow Maneval; Carla J de Boer; Margaret K Yu; Howard I Scher Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-02-17 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Mark Lazari; Serge K Lyashchenko; Eva M Burnazi; Jason S Lewis; R Michael van Dam; Jennifer M Murphy Journal: Appl Radiat Isot Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 1.513
Authors: Dhiraj Kumar; Ala Lisok; Elyes Dahmane; Matthew McCoy; Sagar Shelake; Samit Chatterjee; Viola Allaj; Polina Sysa-Shah; Bryan Wharram; Wojciech G Lesniak; Ellen Tully; Edward Gabrielson; Elizabeth M Jaffee; John T Poirier; Charles M Rudin; Jogarao Vs Gobburu; Martin G Pomper; Sridhar Nimmagadda Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 14.808