Literature DB >> 24001968

Assessement of quadriceps strength, endurance and fatigue in FSHD and CMT: benefits and limits of femoral nerve magnetic stimulation.

D Bachasson1, J Temesi2, C Bankole3, E Lagrange4, C Boutte4, G Y Millet5, S Verges6, P Levy1, L Feasson7, B Wuyam1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To (i) evaluate the feasibility and the reliability of a test assessing quadriceps strength, endurance and fatigue in patients with fascioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT), (ii) compare quadriceps function between patients and healthy controls.
METHODS: Controls performed the test once and patients twice on two separate visits. It involved progressive sets of 10 isometric contractions each followed by neuromuscular assessments with FNMS.
RESULTS: Volitional assessment of muscle strength, endurance and fatigue appeared to be reliable in FSHD and CMT patients. Supramaximal FNMS was achieved in ∼70% of FSHD patients and in no CMT patients. In FSHD patients, Femoral nerve magnetic stimulation (FNMS) provided reliable assessment of central (typical error as a coefficient of variation (CVTE)<8% for voluntary activation) and peripheral (CVTE<10% and intraclass coefficient correlation >0.85 for evoked responses) function. Patients and controls had similar reductions in evoked quadriceps responses, voluntary activation and similar endurance.
CONCLUSIONS: This test provides reliable evaluation but FNMS exhibits limitations due to insufficient stimulation intensity particularly in neurogenic conditions. It showed similar central and peripheral quadriceps fatigability in patients and controls. SIGNIFICANCE: This test may be a valuable tool for patient follow-up although further development of magnetic stimulation devices is needed to extend its applicability.
Copyright © 2013 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  10-Hz potentiated doublets; 100-Hz potentiated doublets; CMT; Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease; Db(10); Db(10):Db(100); Db(100); Experienced fatigue; FNMS; FSHD; Fascioscapulohumeral dystrophy; Femoral magnetic nerve stimulation; Hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy; MVC; MVC(RMS/M); Muscle endurance; Muscle fatigue; Muscle strength; Neuromuscular diseases; SF-36; Tw(p); VA; fascioscapulohumeral dystrophy; femoral nerve magnetic stimulation; maximal voluntary activation; maximal voluntary contraction; medical outcomes study short-form; peak potentiated 10-Hz doublets/peak potentiated 100-Hz doublets; potentiated single twitch; root mean squared calculated from vastus lateralis EMG signal normalized to M-wave amplitude during maximal voluntary contraction

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24001968     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  11 in total

Review 1.  Molecular and biological pathways of skeletal muscle dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Esther Barreiro; Joaquim Gea
Journal:  Chron Respir Dis       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.444

2.  Quantification of Neuromuscular Fatigue: What Do We Do Wrong and Why?

Authors:  Nicolas Place; Guillaume Y Millet
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Difference in Pain and Discomfort of Comparable Wrist Movements Induced by Magnetic or Electrical Stimulation for Peripheral Nerves in the Dorsal Forearm.

Authors:  Genji Abe; Hideki Oyama; Zhenyi Liao; Keita Honda; Kenji Yashima; Akihiko Asao; Shin-Ichi Izumi
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2020-12-18

4.  Increased resistance towards fatigability in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Matteo Beretta-Piccoli; Luca Calanni; Massimo Negro; Giulia Ricci; Cinzia Bettio; Marco Barbero; Angela Berardinelli; Gabriele Siciliano; Rossella Tupler; Emiliano Soldini; Corrado Cescon; Giuseppe D'Antona
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Safety and efficacy of a 6-month home-based exercise program in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Landry-Cyrille Bankolé; Guillaume Y Millet; John Temesi; Damien Bachasson; Marion Ravelojaona; Bernard Wuyam; Samuel Verges; Elodie Ponsot; Jean-Christophe Antoine; Fawzi Kadi; Léonard Féasson
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Acceptability and feasibility of magnetic femoral nerve stimulation in older, functionally impaired patients.

Authors:  Louise A Beveridge; Rosemary J G Price; Louise A Burton; Miles D Witham; Allan D Struthers; Deepa Sumukadas
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-06-15

7.  Membrane Repair Deficit in Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy.

Authors:  Adam J Bittel; Sen Chandra Sreetama; Daniel C Bittel; Adam Horn; James S Novak; Toshifumi Yokota; Aiping Zhang; Rika Maruyama; Kenji Rowel Q Lim; Jyoti K Jaiswal; Yi-Wen Chen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Fatigue in Chronic Respiratory Diseases: Theoretical Framework and Implications For Real-Life Performance and Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Mathieu Gruet
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Relationships between muscle size, strength, and physical activity in adults with muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Matthew F Jacques; Gladys L Onambele-Pearson; Neil D Reeves; Georgina K Stebbings; Jonathon Smith; Christopher I Morse
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 12.910

10.  Reduced specific force in patients with mild and severe facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Saskia Lassche; Nicol C Voermans; Tim Schreuder; Arend Heerschap; Benno Küsters; Coen Ac Ottenheijm; Maria Te Hopman; Baziel Gm van Engelen
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.