| Literature DB >> 27495097 |
Landry-Cyrille Bankolé1, Guillaume Y Millet, John Temesi, Damien Bachasson, Marion Ravelojaona, Bernard Wuyam, Samuel Verges, Elodie Ponsot, Jean-Christophe Antoine, Fawzi Kadi, Léonard Féasson.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous randomized controlled trials investigating exercise training programs in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) patients are scarce and of short duration only. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of a 6-month home-based exercise training program on fitness, muscle, and motor function in FSHD patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27495097 PMCID: PMC4979851 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004497
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.889
Figure 1Global view of the experimental protocol. MAP = maximal aerobic power; T = time (in weeks from baseline measures, T0); VO2 peak = peak oxygen uptake.
Figure 2Study flow diagram. CG = control group; CTG = control-training group; TG = training group.
Figure 3Training sessions. Content of (A) the combined aerobic/strength and (B) interval training sessions. MAP = maximal aerobic power.
Baseline characteristics of participants.
Changes in the main cardio-respiratory, quadriceps function, and fatigue and functional parameters during the randomized controlled trial.
Figure 4Training effects on cycling parameters. Mean changes in (A) peak oxygen uptake, (B) maximal aerobic power in the training group versus control group in the randomized controlled trial and in the control-training group in the nonrandomized trial. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, for within-group differences in the randomized controlled trial compared to T0 (2-way repeated measures ANOVA); ††P < 0.01, †††P < 0.001, for differences compared to T24 in the nonrandomized trial (1-way repeated measures ANOVA). CG = control group; CTG = control-training group; MAP = maximal aerobic power; T = time (in weeks from baseline measures, T0); TG = training group; VO2 peak = peak oxygen uptake.
Figure 5Training effects on neuromuscular, motor, and subjective parameters. Mean changes in (A) isometric maximal voluntary strength, (B) number of submaximal repetitions (muscle endurance), (C) 6-min walking test distance, and (D) experienced fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale score) in the training group versus control group in the randomized controlled trial and in the control-training group in the nonrandomized trial. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001 for within-group differences in the randomized controlled trial compared to T0 (2-way repeated measures ANOVA); †P < 0.05, ††P < 0.01, for differences compared to T24 in the nonrandomized trial (1-way repeated measures ANOVA). CG = control group; CTG = control-training group; MVC = maximal voluntary contraction; T = time (in weeks from baseline measures, T0); TG = training group.
Changes in muscle cross-sectional area and enzyme activities in the randomized controlled trial.