Literature DB >> 24001715

A combined approach facilitates the reliable detection of human spermatogonia in vitro.

N Kossack1, N Terwort, J Wistuba, J Ehmcke, S Schlatt, H Schöler, S Kliesch, J Gromoll.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Does a combined approach allow for the unequivocal detection of human germ cells and particularly of spermatogonia in vitro? SUMMARY ANSWER: Based on our findings, we conclude that an approach comprising: (i) the detailed characterization of patients and tissue samples prior to the selection of biopsies, (ii) the use of unambiguous markers for the characterization of cultures and (iii) the use of biopsies lacking the germ cell population as a negative control is the prerequisite for the establishment of human germ cell cultures. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The use of non-specific marker genes and the failure to assess the presence of testicular somatic cell types in germ cell cultures may have led to a misinterpretation of results and the erroneous description of germ cells in previous studies. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Testicular biopsies were selected from a pool of 264 consecutively obtained biopsies. Based on the histological diagnosis, biopsies with distinct histological phenotypes were selected (n = 35) to analyze the expression of germ cell and somatic cell markers. For germ cell culture experiments, gonadotrophin levels and clinical data were used as selection criteria resulting in the following two groups: (i) biopsies with qualitatively intact spermatogenesis (n = 4) and (ii) biopsies from Klinefelter syndrome Klinefelter patients lacking the germ cell population (n = 3). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Quantitative real-time PCR analyses were performed to evaluate the specificity of 18 selected germ cell and 3 somatic marker genes. Cell specificity of individual markers was subsequently validated using immunohistochemistry. Finally, testicular cell cultures were established and were analyzed after 10 days for the expression of germ cell- (UTF1, FGFR3, MAGE A4, DDX4) and somatic cell-specific markers (SMA, VIM, LHCGR) at the RNA and the protein levels. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Interestingly, only 9 out of 18 marker genes reflected the presence of germ cells and cell specificity could be validated using immunohistochemistry. Furthermore, VIM, SMA and LHCGR were found to reflect the presence of testicular somatic cells at the RNA and the protein levels. Using this validated marker panel and biopsies lacking the germ cell population (n = 3) as a negative control, we demonstrated that germ cell cultures containing spermatogonia can be established from biopsies with normal spermatogenesis (n = 4) and that these cultures can be maintained for the period of 10 days. However, marker profiling has to be performed at regular time points as the composition of testicular cell types may continuously change under longer term culture conditions. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: There are significant differences regarding the spermatogonial stem cell (SSC) system and spermatogenesis between rodents and primates. It is therefore possible that marker genes that do not reflect the presence of spermatogonia in the human are specific for spermatogonia in other animal models. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: While some studies have reported that human SSCs can be maintained in vitro and show characteristics of pluripotency, the germ cell origin and the differentiation potential of these cells were subsequently called into question. This study provides critical insights into possible sources for the misinterpretation of results regarding the presence of germ cells in human testicular cell cultures and our findings can therefore help to avoid conflicting reports in the future. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This project was supported by the Stem Cell Network North Rhine-Westphalia and the Innovative Medical Research of the University of Münster Medical School (Grant KO111014). In addition, it was funded by the DFG-Research Unit FOR 1041 Germ Cell Potential (GR 1547/11-1 and SCHL 394/11-2), the BMBF (01GN0809/10) and the IZKF (CRA 03/09). The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  combined approach; germ cell-specific markers; human germ cell culture; spermatogonia; testicular biopsies

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24001715     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  29 in total

1.  Quantitative detection of human spermatogonia for optimization of spermatogonial stem cell culture.

Authors:  Y Zheng; A Thomas; C M Schmidt; C T Dann
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  Transcriptional control of spermatogonial maintenance and differentiation.

Authors:  Hye-Won Song; Miles F Wilkinson
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 7.727

3.  Spermatogonial Stem Cells Protein Identification in In Vitro Culture from Non-Obstructive Azoospermia Patient.

Authors:  Azantee Yazmie Abdul Wahab; Muhammad Lokman Md Isa; Roszaman Ramli
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2016-05

Review 4.  [Androprotect and prospects for fertility treatment].

Authors:  S Kliesch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Spermatogonial stem cells.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kubota; Ralph L Brinster
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 6.  The Progresses of Spermatogonial Stem Cells Sorting Using Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting.

Authors:  Yihui Cai; Jingjing Wang; Kang Zou
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.739

7.  Spermatogonial stem cells: Current biotechnological advances in reproduction and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Pedro Manuel Aponte
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 5.326

8.  De novo methylation in male germ cells of the common marmoset monkey occurs during postnatal development and is maintained in vitro.

Authors:  Daniel Langenstroth-Röwer; Jörg Gromoll; Joachim Wistuba; Ina Tröndle; Sandra Laurentino; Stefan Schlatt; Nina Neuhaus
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.528

9.  Characterization of human spermatogonial stem cell markers in fetal, pediatric, and adult testicular tissues.

Authors:  Eran Altman; Pamela Yango; Radwa Moustafa; James F Smith; Peter C Klatsky; Nam D Tran
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.906

10.  Fluorescence- and magnetic-activated cell sorting strategies to isolate and enrich human spermatogonial stem cells.

Authors:  Hanna Valli; Meena Sukhwani; Serena L Dovey; Karen A Peters; Julia Donohue; Carlos A Castro; Tianjiao Chu; Gary R Marshall; Kyle E Orwig
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.