Literature DB >> 25267789

Quantitative detection of human spermatogonia for optimization of spermatogonial stem cell culture.

Y Zheng1, A Thomas1, C M Schmidt1, C T Dann2.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Can human spermatogonia be detected in long-term primary testicular cell cultures using validated, germ cell-specific markers of spermatogonia? SUMMARY ANSWER: Germ cell-specific markers of spermatogonia/spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) are detected in early (1-2 weeks) but not late (> 6 weeks) primary testicular cell cultures; somatic cell markers are detected in late primary testicular cell cultures. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The development of conditions for human SSC culture is critically dependent on the ability to define cell types unequivocally and to quantify spermatogonia/SSCs. Growth by somatic cells presents a major challenge in the establishment of SSC cultures and therefore markers that define spermatogonia/SSCs, but are not also expressed by testicular somatic cells, are essential for accurate characterization of SSC cultures. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Testicular tissue from eight organ donors with normal spermatogenesis was used for assay validation and establishing primary testicular cell cultures. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Immunofluorescence analysis of normal human testicular tissue was used to validate antibodies (UTF1, SALL4, DAZL and VIM) and then the antibodies were used to demonstrate that primary testicular cells cultured in vitro for 1-2 weeks were composed of somatic cells and rare germ cells. Primary testicular cell cultures were further characterized by comparing to testicular somatic cell cultures using quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (UTF1, FGFR3, ZBTB16, GPR125, DAZL, GATA4 and VIM) and flow cytometry (CD9 and SSEA4). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: UTF1, FGFR3, DAZL and ZBTB16 qRT-PCR and SSEA4 flow cytometry were validated for the sensitive, quantitative and specific detection of germ cells. In contrast, GPR125 mRNA and CD9 were found to be not specific to germ cells because they were also expressed in testicular somatic cell cultures. While the germ cell-specific markers were detected in early primary testicular cell cultures (1-2 weeks), their expression steadily declined over time in vitro. After 6 weeks in culture only somatic cells were detected. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Different groups attempting SSC culture have utilized different sources of human testes and minor differences in the preparation and maintenance of the testicular cell cultures. Differences in outcome may be explained by genetic background of the source tissue or technical differences. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: The ability to propagate human SSCs in vitro is a prerequisite for proposed autologous transplantation therapy aimed at restoring fertility to men who have been treated for childhood cancer. By applying the assays validated here it will be possible to quantitatively compare human SSC culture conditions. The eventual development of conditions for long-term propagation of human SSCs in vitro will greatly facilitate learning about the basic biology of these cells and in turn the ability to use human SSCs in therapy. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The experiments presented in this manuscript were funded by a Project Development Team within the ICTSI NIH/NCRR Grant Number TR000006. The authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell culture; fertility; germ cells; stage-specific embryonic antigens; testis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25267789      PMCID: PMC4191455          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  42 in total

1.  Functional identification of the actual and potential stem cell compartments in mouse spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Toshinori Nakagawa; Yo-Ichi Nabeshima; Shosei Yoshida
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 2.  Maintaining the male germline: regulation of spermatogonial stem cells.

Authors:  Kyle Caires; Johnathan Broady; Derek McLean
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 4.286

3.  Proliferation of small number of human spermatogonial stem cells obtained from azoospermic patients.

Authors:  Morteza Koruji; Abdulhossein Shahverdi; Arghavan Janan; Abbas Piryaei; Mohammad Reza Lakpour; Mohammad Ali Gilani Sedighi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Evaluation of candidate spermatogonial markers ID4 and GPR125 in testes of adult human cadaveric organ donors.

Authors:  C Sachs; B D Robinson; L Andres Martin; T Webster; M Gilbert; H-Y Lo; S Rafii; C K Ng; M Seandel
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.842

5.  Conservation of spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal signaling between mouse and rat.

Authors:  Buom-Yong Ryu; Hiroshi Kubota; Mary R Avarbock; Ralph L Brinster
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The spermatogonial stem cell population in adult rats. I. Their morphology, proliferation and maturation.

Authors:  C Huckins
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1971-03

7.  DAZ family proteins exist throughout male germ cell development and transit from nucleus to cytoplasm at meiosis in humans and mice.

Authors:  R A Reijo; D M Dorfman; R Slee; A A Renshaw; K R Loughlin; H Cooke; D C Page
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.285

8.  Long-term proliferation in culture and germline transmission of mouse male germline stem cells.

Authors:  Mito Kanatsu-Shinohara; Narumi Ogonuki; Kimiko Inoue; Hiromi Miki; Atsuo Ogura; Shinya Toyokuni; Takashi Shinohara
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 4.285

9.  Long-term Culture of Human SSEA-4 Positive Spermatogonial Stem Cells (SSCs).

Authors:  Maria Kokkinaki; Ardalan Djourabtchi; Nady Golestaneh
Journal:  J Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2011-11-11

10.  Spermatogenic cells of the prepuberal mouse. Isolation and morphological characterization.

Authors:  A R Bellvé; J C Cavicchia; C F Millette; D A O'Brien; Y M Bhatnagar; M Dym
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Advances in Isolation Methods for Spermatogonial Stem Cells.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Jin Sun; Kang Zou
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 2.  Spermatogonial Stem Cell Culture in Oncofertility.

Authors:  Sherin David; Kyle E Orwig
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 3.  Spermatogonial stem cells.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kubota; Ralph L Brinster
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 4.285

4.  Human Testis Extracellular Matrix Enhances Human Spermatogonial Stem Cell Survival In Vitro.

Authors:  Mark H Murdock; Sherin David; Ilea T Swinehart; Janet E Reing; Kien Tran; Kathrin Gassei; Kyle E Orwig; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 5.  The Progresses of Spermatogonial Stem Cells Sorting Using Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting.

Authors:  Yihui Cai; Jingjing Wang; Kang Zou
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 6.  Fertility Preservation and Restoration Options for Pre-Pubertal Male Cancer Patients: Current Approaches.

Authors:  Elena Eugeni; Iva Arato; Rachele Del Sordo; Angelo Sidoni; Andrea Garolla; Alberto Ferlin; Riccardo Calafiore; Stefano Brancorsini; Francesca Mancuso; Giovanni Luca
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.055

7.  Sphere-formation culture of testicular germ cells in the common marmoset, a small New World monkey.

Authors:  Zachary Yu-Ching Lin; Orie Hikabe; Sadafumi Suzuki; Takamasa Hirano; Haruhiko Siomi; Erika Sasaki; Masanori Imamura; Hideyuki Okano
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.163

Review 8.  Harnessing the full potential of reproductive genetics and epigenetics for male infertility in the era of "big data".

Authors:  Darshan P Patel; Tim G Jenkins; Kenneth I Aston; Jingtao Guo; Alexander W Pastuszak; Heidi A Hanson; James M Hotaling
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Genome editing in mouse spermatogonial stem/progenitor cells using engineered nucleases.

Authors:  Danielle A Fanslow; Stacey E Wirt; Jenny C Barker; Jon P Connelly; Matthew H Porteus; Christina Tenenhaus Dann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Spermatogonial Stem Cells: Implications for Genetic Disorders and Prevention.

Authors:  Makiko Yamada; Letizia De Chiara; Marco Seandel
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 3.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.