Literature DB >> 24001484

Software-guided insulin dosing: tight glycemic control and decreased glycemic derangements in critically ill patients.

Nicole M Saur1, Gail L Kongable, Sharon Holewinski, Keri O'Brien, Stanley A Nasraway.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether glycemic derangements are more effectively controlled using software-guided insulin dosing compared with paper-based protocols. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated consecutive critically ill patients treated in a tertiary hospital surgical intensive care unit (ICU) between January 1 and June 30, 2008, and between January 1 and September 30, 2009. Paper-based protocol insulin dosing was evaluated as a baseline during the first period, followed by software-guided insulin dosing in the second period. We compared glycemic metrics related to hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and glycemic variability during the 2 periods.
RESULTS: We treated 110 patients by the paper-based protocol and 87 by the software-guided protocol during the before and after periods, respectively. The mean ICU admission blood glucose (BG) level was higher in patients receiving software-guided intensive insulin than for those receiving paper-based intensive insulin (181 vs 156 mg/dL; P=.003, mean of the per-patient mean). Patients treated with software-guided intensive insulin had lower mean BG levels (117 vs 135 mg/dL; P=.0008), sustained greater time in the desired BG target range (95-135 mg/dL; 68% vs 52%; P=.0001), had less frequent hypoglycemia (percentage of time BG level was <70 mg/dL: 0.51% vs 1.44%; P=.04), and showed decreased glycemic variability (BG level per-patient standard deviation from the mean: ±29 vs ±42 mg/dL; P=.01).
CONCLUSION: Surgical ICU patients whose intensive insulin infusions were managed using the software-guided program achieved tighter glycemic control and fewer glycemic derangements than those managed with the paper-based insulin dosing regimen.
Copyright © 2013 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  APACHE II; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; BG; CV; GPI; GV; ICU; MAGE; blood glucose; coefficient of variation; glycemic penalty index; glycemic variability; intensive care unit; mean amplitude of glycemic excursions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24001484     DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  13 in total

Review 1.  Diabetes Technology in the Inpatient Setting for Management of Hyperglycemia.

Authors:  Georgia M Davis; Rodolfo J Galindo; Alexandra L Migdal; Guillermo E Umpierrez
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.741

2.  High Glucose Variability in Hospitalized Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Vikash Dadlani; Shrikant U Tamhane; Aidong Sun; Anu Sharma; Danae A Delivanis; Prabin Thapa; Ricky E Carter; Yogish C Kudva
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Fifteen-minute Frequency of Glucose Measurements and the Use of Threshold Alarms: Impact on Mitigating Dysglycemia in Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Grant V Bochicchio; Stanley A Nasraway; Laura J Moore; Anthony P Furnary; Eden A Nohra; Kelly M Bochicchio; James C Boyd; David I Bruns; Irl B Hirsch; Jean-Charles Preiser; James S Krinsley
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-19

Review 4.  Hypoglycemia Prevention by Algorithm Design During Intravenous Insulin Infusion.

Authors:  Susan Shapiro Braithwaite; Lisa P Clark; Thaer Idrees; Faisal Qureshi; Oluwakemi T Soetan
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.810

5.  Insulin Infusion Computer Calculator Programmed Directly Into Electronic Health Record Medication Administration Record.

Authors:  Kristen Kulasa; Brittany Serences; Michael Nies; Robert El-Kareh; Kirk Kurashige; Kevin Box
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-29

6.  Improving Hospital Glucometrics, Workflow, and Outcomes with a Computerized Intravenous Insulin Dose Calculator Built into the Electronic Health Record.

Authors:  Daniel Shelden; Mohammed Ateya; Angela Jensen; Patrick Arnold; Tiffany Bellomo; Roma Gianchandani
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-12-23

7.  Intensive insulin therapy increases glutathione synthesis rate in surgical ICU patients with stress hyperglycemia.

Authors:  Gianni Biolo; Benedetta Massolino; Filippo Giorgio Di Girolamo; Nicola Fiotti; Filippo Mearelli; Sara Mazzucco; Carlos Bertuzzi; Renzo Lazzarini; Alfonso Colombatti; Marcello De Cicco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Software-guided versus nurse-directed blood glucose control in critically ill patients: the LOGIC-2 multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Jasperina Dubois; Tom Van Herpe; Roosmarijn T van Hooijdonk; Ruben Wouters; Domien Coart; Pieter Wouters; Aimé Van Assche; Guy Veraghtert; Bart De Moor; Joost Wauters; Alexander Wilmer; Marcus J Schultz; Greet Van den Berghe; Dieter Mesotten
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Space GlucoseControl system for blood glucose control in intensive care patients--a European multicentre observational study.

Authors:  Jan Blaha; Barbara Barteczko-Grajek; Pawel Berezowicz; Jiri Charvat; Jiri Chvojka; Teodoro Grau; Jonathan Holmgren; Ulrich Jaschinski; Petr Kopecky; Jan Manak; Mette Moehl; Jonathan Paddle; Marcello Pasculli; Johan Petersson; Sirak Petros; Danilo Radrizzani; Vinodkumar Singh; Joel Starkopf
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  Glucose Meter Use in the Intensive Care Unit: Much Ado About Something.

Authors:  S Karon Brad
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2014-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.