Literature DB >> 23998546

Cardiac computed tomography guided treatment strategy in patients with recent acute-onset chest pain: results from the randomised, controlled trial: CArdiac cT in the treatment of acute CHest pain (CATCH).

Jesper James Linde1, Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed, Mathias Sørgaard, Henning Kelbæk, Gorm Boje Jensen, Walter Bjørn Nielsen, Jens Dahlgaard Hove.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In patients admitted on suspicion of acute coronary syndrome, with normal electrocardiogram and troponines, we evaluated the clinical impact of a Coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-strategy on referral rate for invasive coronary angiography (ICA), detection of significant coronary stenoses (positive predictive value [PPV]) and subsequent revascularisations, as compared to a function-based strategy (standard care). Secondarily we assessed intermediate term clinical events. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We randomised 600 patients to a CCTA-guided strategy (299 patients) or standard care (301 patients). In the CCTA-guided group referral for ICA required a coronary stenosis >70% or >50% in the left main, and for intermediate stenoses (50-70%), a stress test was used. A significant stenosis on ICA was defined as a stenosis ≥70% or reduced FFR ≤0.75 in intermediate stenoses (50-70%). Referral rate for ICA was 17% with CCTA vs. 12% with standard care (p=0.1). ICA confirmed significant coronary artery stenoses in 12% vs. 4% (p=0.001), and 10% vs. 4% were subsequently revascularised (p=0.005). PPV for the detection of significant stenoses was 71% with CCTA vs 36% with standard care (p=0.001). Clinical events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, revascularisation and readmission for chest pain), during 120 days of follow-up, were recorded in 8 patients (3%) in the CCTA-guided group vs. 15 patients (5%) in the standard care group (p=0.1).
CONCLUSION: In patients with recent acute-onset chest pain, a CCTA-guided diagnostic strategy improves PPV for the detection of significant coronary stenoses, and increases the frequency of revascularisations, when compared to a conventional functional approach.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute coronary syndrome; Angina pectoris; Cardiac computed tomographic angiography; Ischaemic heart disease

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23998546     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.08.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  21 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of mid- to long-term clinical outcomes between anatomical testing and usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  In-Chang Hwang; Sol Ji Choi; Ji Eun Choi; Eun-Bi Ko; Jae Kyung Suh; Insun Choi; Hyun-Jae Kang; Yong-Jin Kim; Joo Youn Kim
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 2.  Cardiac CT: atherosclerosis to acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Ravi Kiran Munnur; James D Cameron; Brian S Ko; Ian T Meredith; Dennis T L Wong
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-12

3.  Reproducibility of coronary atherosclerotic plaque characteristics in populations with low, intermediate, and high prevalence of coronary artery disease by multidetector computer tomography: a guide to reliable visual coronary plaque assessments.

Authors:  Martina C de Knegt; Jesper J Linde; Andreas Fuchs; Børge G Nordestgaard; Lars V Køber; Jens D Hove; Klaus F Kofoed
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography vs Functional Stress Testing for Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew J Foy; Sanket S Dhruva; Brandon Peterson; John M Mandrola; Daniel J Morgan; Rita F Redberg
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Transmural myocardial perfusion gradients in relation to coronary artery stenoses severity assessed by cardiac multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Jesper James Linde; Jørgen Tobias Kühl; Jens Dahlgaard Hove; Mathias Sørgaard; Henning Kelbæk; Walter Bjørn Nielsen; Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Cardiac CT vs. Stress Testing in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Review and Expert Recommendations.

Authors:  Amir Ali Rahsepar; Armin Arbab-Zadeh
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2015-06-17

7.  Prediction of clinical outcome by myocardial CT perfusion in patients with low-risk unstable angina pectoris.

Authors:  Jesper J Linde; Mathias Sørgaard; Jørgen T Kühl; Jens D Hove; Henning Kelbæk; Walter B Nielsen; Klaus F Kofoed
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Diagnostic Strategies for the Evaluation of Chest Pain: Clinical Implications From SCOT-HEART and PROMISE.

Authors:  Christopher B Fordyce; David E Newby; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  The RAPID-CTCA trial (Rapid Assessment of Potential Ischaemic Heart Disease with CTCA) - a multicentre parallel-group randomised trial to compare early computerised tomography coronary angiography versus standard care in patients presenting with suspected or confirmed acute coronary syndrome: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Alasdair J Gray; Carl Roobottom; Jason E Smith; Steve Goodacre; Katherine Oatey; Rachel O'Brien; Robert F Storey; Lumine Na; Steff C Lewis; Praveen Thokala; David E Newby
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Respiratory influence on left atrial volume calculation with 3D-echocardiography.

Authors:  Mathias Sørgaard; Jesper J Linde; Hafsa Ismail; Niels Risum; Klaus F Kofoed; Jørgen T Kühl; Benjamin Tittle; Walter B Nielsen; Jens D Hove
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 2.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.