Literature DB >> 23997728

Differences in treatment of digital amputation injuries based on community transfer versus tertiary initial presentation.

Benjamin Amis1, Jeffrey Friedrich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this paper is to compare a group of patients with upper extremity amputation injuries who presented to a tertiary referral center without having been previously seen at another hospital versus a group of patients who was transferred from another facility. We hypothesize that transferred patients will generally undergo more complex treatments, that some transferred patients will be treated in the ER with simple treatments (thereby perhaps not requiring transfer), and that transferred patients will be less likely to have insurance coverage.
METHODS: All patients who presented to our ER from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2008 with the classification of hand and finger amputation were included. Data collected included whether or not the patient was transferred from another institution, age, mechanism of injury, partial versus total amputation, location treated, transportation method, general treatment classification, type of insurance, and month of presentation.
RESULTS: No statistical difference was found between patients who were transferred versus those who were not with respect to age, sex, mechanism, whether the amputation was partial versus complete, or insurance coverage. Statistical differences were noted between the subset of patients who was transferred versus those who were not with respect to treatment location, method of transportation, and treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients transferred to our institution required significantly more complex treatments and were significantly more likely to be treated in the operating room. A small but significant group of patients was treated in the ER or required relatively simple treatments after transfer. Our hypothesis that a higher percentage of patients transferred to our institution would have less insurance coverage was not supported by the data. Tertiary centers can expect to continue receiving a steady stream of amputation referrals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digital amputation; Hand amputation; Transfer; Treatment

Year:  2012        PMID: 23997728      PMCID: PMC3418370          DOI: 10.1007/s11552-012-9431-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hand (N Y)        ISSN: 1558-9447


  13 in total

1.  Finger replantation in the United States: rates and resource use from the 1996 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project.

Authors:  K C Chung; C P Kowalski; M R Walters
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.230

2.  Injury mortality following the loss of air medical support for rural interhospital transport.

Authors:  N Clay Mann; Kerrie A Pinkney; Daniel D Price; Donna Rowland; Melanie Arthur; Jerris R Hedges; Richard J Mullins
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality.

Authors:  Ellen J MacKenzie; Frederick P Rivara; Gregory J Jurkovich; Avery B Nathens; Katherine P Frey; Brian L Egleston; David S Salkever; Daniel O Scharfstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Current practice of microsurgery by members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand.

Authors:  Alexander H Payatakes; Nikolaos P Zagoreos; Gregory G Fedorcik; David S Ruch; L Scott Levin
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  Impact of discontinuing a hospital-based air ambulance service on trauma patient outcomes.

Authors:  Vicky L Chappell; William J Mileski; Steven E Wolf; Dennis C Gore
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2002-03

6.  Effectiveness of state trauma systems in reducing injury-related mortality: a national evaluation.

Authors:  A B Nathens; G J Jurkovich; F P Rivara; R V Maier
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2000-01

7.  Are patients being transferred to level-I trauma centers for reasons other than medical necessity?

Authors:  Kenneth J Koval; Chad W Tingey; Kevin F Spratt
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Digital replantation in children.

Authors:  G L Cheng; D D Pan; Z X Yang; G R Fang; X S Gong
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  Emergency interhospital transport of the major trauma patient: air versus ground.

Authors:  C R Boyd; K M Corse; R C Campbell
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1989-06

10.  Results of 1018 digital replantations in 552 patients.

Authors:  S Waikakul; S Sakkarnkosol; V Vanadurongwan; A Un-nanuntana
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.586

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of Policy Change on the Use of Long-Distance Transport and Follow-Up Care for Patients With Traumatic Finger Amputations.

Authors:  Michael T Nolte; Melissa J Shauver; Kevin C Chung; Aviram M Giladi
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.230

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.