| Literature DB >> 23997587 |
Achilleas Thoma1, Teegan A Ignacy, Natalia Ziolkowski, Sophocles Voineskos.
Abstract
Increased spending and reduced funding for health care is forcing decision makers to prioritize procedures and redistribute funds. Decision making is based on reliable data regarding the costs and benefits of medical and surgical procedures; such a study design is known as an economic evaluation. The onus is on the plastic surgery community to produce high-quality economic evaluations that support the cost effectiveness of the procedures that are performed. The present review focuses on the cost-utility analysis and its role in deciding whether a novel technique/procedure/technology should be accepted over one that is prevalent. Additionally, the five steps in undertaking a cost-utility (effectiveness) analysis are outlined.Keywords: Cost-effectiveness analysis; Cost-utility analysis; Economic analysis; Economic evaluation; Quality-adjusted life year
Year: 2012 PMID: 23997587 PMCID: PMC3433817 DOI: 10.1177/229255031202000319
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Can J Plast Surg ISSN: 1195-2199