Literature DB >> 23996625

7 Tesla MR imaging: opportunities and challenges.

L Umutlu1, M E Ladd1, M Forsting2, T Lauenstein2.   

Abstract

The urge to increase magnetic field strength is driven by a number of potentially beneficial physical changes, possibly resulting in improved MR diagnostics. With the successful introduction of in-vivo ultra-high-field MR imaging, by means of 7 Tesla MRI, the focus of scientific research has been set on compiling different applications of brain and body imaging. This review presents an overview on the current status of 7 T MR imaging, investigating the opportunities as well as challenges associated with ultra-high-field MRI. Citation Format: • Umutlu L, Ladd ME, Forsting M et al. 7 Tesla MR Imaging: Opportunities and Challenges. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2014; 186: 121 - 129. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23996625     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1350406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  12 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging at ultrahigh fields.

Authors:  Kamil Ugurbil
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 2.  Progress in Imaging the Human Torso at the Ultrahigh Fields of 7 and 10.5 T.

Authors:  Kamil Uğurbil; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Andrea Grant; Edward J Auerbach; Arcan Ertürk; Russell Lagore; Jutta M Ellermann; Xiaoxuan He; Gregor Adriany; Gregory J Metzger
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Resistor-free and one-board-fits-all ratio adjustable power splitter for add-on RF shimming in high field MRI.

Authors:  Yue Zhu; Ming Lu; Xinqiang Yan
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.734

4.  Cortical source analysis of high-density EEG recordings in children.

Authors:  Joe Bathelt; Helen O'Reilly; Michelle de Haan
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  High resolution pituitary gland MRI at 7.0 tesla: a clinical evaluation in Cushing's disease.

Authors:  Alexandra A J de Rotte; Amy Groenewegen; Dik R Rutgers; Theo Witkamp; Pierre M J Zelissen; F J Anton Meijer; Erik J van Lindert; Ad Hermus; Peter R Luijten; Jeroen Hendrikse
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction of Structural MR Images: A Data-Driven Approach to Define Input Algorithm Parameters.

Authors:  Marco Ganzetti; Nicole Wenderoth; Dante Mantini
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.081

7.  1.5 versus 3 versus 7 Tesla in abdominal MRI: A comparative study.

Authors:  Anja Laader; Karsten Beiderwellen; Oliver Kraff; Stefan Maderwald; Karsten Wrede; Mark E Ladd; Thomas C Lauenstein; Michael Forsting; Harald H Quick; Kai Nassenstein; Lale Umutlu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Evolution of UHF Body Imaging in the Human Torso at 7T: Technology, Applications, and Future Directions.

Authors:  M Arcan Erturk; Xiufeng Li; Pierre-Fancois Van de Moortele; Kamil Ugurbil; Gregory J Metzger
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-06

9.  Quantitative Evaluation of Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction Methods for Structural MR Brain Images.

Authors:  Marco Ganzetti; Nicole Wenderoth; Dante Mantini
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2016-01

10.  Feasibility of aortic valve planimetry at 7 T ultrahigh field MRI: Comparison to aortic valve MRI at 3 T and 1.5 T.

Authors:  Juliane Goebel; Felix Nensa; Haemi P Schemuth; Stefan Maderwald; Thomas Schlosser; Stephan Orzada; Stefan Rietsch; Harald H Quick; Kai Nassenstein
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2018-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.