Literature DB >> 23994130

Analytical challenges for conducting rapid metabolism characterization for QIVIVE.

Ari Tolonen1, Olavi Pelkonen2.   

Abstract

For quantitative in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (QIVIVE) of metabolism for the purposes of toxicokinetics prediction, a precise and robust analytical technique for identifying and measuring a chemical and its metabolites is an absolute prerequisite. Currently, high-resolution mass spectrometry (HR-MS) is a tool of choice for a majority of organic relatively lipophilic molecules, linked with a LC separation tool and simultaneous UV-detection. However, additional techniques such as gas chromatography, radiometric measurements and NMR, are required to cover the whole spectrum of chemical structures. To accumulate enough reliable and robust data for the validation of QIVIVE, there are some partially opposing needs: Detailed delineation of the in vitro test system to produce a reliable toxicokinetic measure for a studied chemical, and a throughput capacity of the in vitro set-up and the analytical tool as high as possible. We discuss current analytical challenges for the identification and quantification of chemicals and their metabolites, both stable and reactive, focusing especially on LC-MS techniques, but simultaneously attempting to pinpoint factors associated with sample preparation, testing conditions and strengths and weaknesses of a particular technique available for a particular task.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drug metabolism; Drug metabolites; High resolution mass spectrometry (HR-MS); High throughput screening (HTS); Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS)

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23994130     DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2013.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  4 in total

Review 1.  In vitro to in vivo extrapolation for high throughput prioritization and decision making.

Authors:  Shannon M Bell; Xiaoqing Chang; John F Wambaugh; David G Allen; Mike Bartels; Kim L R Brouwer; Warren M Casey; Neepa Choksi; Stephen S Ferguson; Grazyna Fraczkiewicz; Annie M Jarabek; Alice Ke; Annie Lumen; Scott G Lynn; Alicia Paini; Paul S Price; Caroline Ring; Ted W Simon; Nisha S Sipes; Catherine S Sprankle; Judy Strickland; John Troutman; Barbara A Wetmore; Nicole C Kleinstreuer
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.500

2.  Evaluation and calibration of high-throughput predictions of chemical distribution to tissues.

Authors:  Robert G Pearce; R Woodrow Setzer; Jimena L Davis; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) on testing and interpretation of comparative in vitro metabolism studies.

Authors:  Antonio F Hernandez-Jerez; Paulien Adriaanse; Annette Aldrich; Philippe Berny; Tamara Coja; Sabine Duquesne; Andreas Focks; Marina Marinovich; Maurice Millet; Olavi Pelkonen; Silvia Pieper; Aaldrik Tiktak; Christopher J Topping; Anneli Widenfalk; Martin Wilks; Gerrit Wolterink; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Jochem Louisse; Serge Rudaz; Emanuela Testai; Alfonso Lostia; Jean-Lou Dorne; Juan Manuel Parra Morte
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-12-23

Review 4.  Coumarin-Based Profluorescent and Fluorescent Substrates for Determining Xenobiotic-Metabolizing Enzyme Activities In Vitro.

Authors:  Hannu Raunio; Olli Pentikäinen; Risto O Juvonen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.