CONTEXT: Glycemic control is limited by the barrier of hypoglycemia. Recurrent hypoglycemia impairs counterregulatory (CR) hormone responses to subsequent hypoglycemia. OBJECTIVE: To determine the glucagon and epinephrine responses to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in adolescents with recent-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). METHODS: We assessed the CR responses to hypoglycemia by performing a hyperinsulinemic (2.0 mU/kg/min), euglycemic (BG 90 mg/dL; 5.0 mmol/L)-hypoglycemic (BG 55 mg/dL; 3.0 mmol/L) clamp in 25 recent-onset (<1 yr duration) patients 9-18 yr old (mean ± SD: 13.4 ± 2.7) with T1DM and 16 non-diabetic controls 19-25 yr old (mean ± SD 23.3 ± 1.8). Twenty of the T1DM subjects were retested 1-yr (53 ± 3 wk) later. RESULTS: At the initial and 1-yr studies, peak glucagon (pGON) and incremental glucagon (ΔGON) during hypoglycemia were lower in the T1DM subjects [median pGON = 47 pg/mL (quartiles: 34, 72), ΔGON = 16 (4, 27) initially and pGON = 50 pg/mL (42, 70), ΔGON = 12 (9, 19) at 1-yr] than in controls [pGON = 93 pg/mL (60, 111); ΔGON = 38 pg/mL (19, 66), p = 0.01 and p = 0.004 for ΔGON at initial and 1-yr study, respectively]. In contrast, peak epinephrine (pEPI) and incremental epinephrine (ΔEPI) levels were similar in the T1DM (pEPI = 356 pg/mL (174, 797) and ΔEPI = 322 pg/mL (143, 781) initially and pEPI = 469 pg/mL (305, 595) and ΔEPI = 440 pg/mL (285, 574) at 1 yr) and in controls (pEPI = 383 pg/mL (329, 493) and ΔEPI = 336 pg/mL (298, 471) p = 0.97 and 0.21 for ΔEPI at initial and 1-yr study, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Even within the first year of T1DM, glucagon responses to hypoglycemia are blunted but epinephrine responses are not, suggesting that the mechanisms involved in the loss of these hormonal responses, which are key components in pathophysiology of hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure, are different.
CONTEXT: Glycemic control is limited by the barrier of hypoglycemia. Recurrent hypoglycemia impairs counterregulatory (CR) hormone responses to subsequent hypoglycemia. OBJECTIVE: To determine the glucagon and epinephrine responses to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in adolescents with recent-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). METHODS: We assessed the CR responses to hypoglycemia by performing a hyperinsulinemic (2.0 mU/kg/min), euglycemic (BG 90 mg/dL; 5.0 mmol/L)-hypoglycemic (BG 55 mg/dL; 3.0 mmol/L) clamp in 25 recent-onset (<1 yr duration) patients 9-18 yr old (mean ± SD: 13.4 ± 2.7) with T1DM and 16 non-diabetic controls 19-25 yr old (mean ± SD 23.3 ± 1.8). Twenty of the T1DM subjects were retested 1-yr (53 ± 3 wk) later. RESULTS: At the initial and 1-yr studies, peak glucagon (pGON) and incremental glucagon (ΔGON) during hypoglycemia were lower in the T1DM subjects [median pGON = 47 pg/mL (quartiles: 34, 72), ΔGON = 16 (4, 27) initially and pGON = 50 pg/mL (42, 70), ΔGON = 12 (9, 19) at 1-yr] than in controls [pGON = 93 pg/mL (60, 111); ΔGON = 38 pg/mL (19, 66), p = 0.01 and p = 0.004 for ΔGON at initial and 1-yr study, respectively]. In contrast, peak epinephrine (pEPI) and incremental epinephrine (ΔEPI) levels were similar in the T1DM (pEPI = 356 pg/mL (174, 797) and ΔEPI = 322 pg/mL (143, 781) initially and pEPI = 469 pg/mL (305, 595) and ΔEPI = 440 pg/mL (285, 574) at 1 yr) and in controls (pEPI = 383 pg/mL (329, 493) and ΔEPI = 336 pg/mL (298, 471) p = 0.97 and 0.21 for ΔEPI at initial and 1-yr study, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Even within the first year of T1DM, glucagon responses to hypoglycemia are blunted but epinephrine responses are not, suggesting that the mechanisms involved in the loss of these hormonal responses, which are key components in pathophysiology of hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure, are different.
Authors: David M Nathan; Patricia A Cleary; Jye-Yu C Backlund; Saul M Genuth; John M Lachin; Trevor J Orchard; Philip Raskin; Bernard Zinman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-12-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: L A Donnelly; A D Morris; B M Frier; J D Ellis; P T Donnan; R Durrant; M M Band; G Reekie; G P Leese Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: G Bolli; P de Feo; P Compagnucci; M G Cartechini; G Angeletti; F Santeusanio; P Brunetti; J E Gerich Journal: Diabetes Date: 1983-02 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Aris Siafarikas; Robert J Johnston; Max K Bulsara; Peter O'Leary; Timothy W Jones; Elizabeth A Davis Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-06-14 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jennifer Sherr; Dongyuan Xing; Katrina J Ruedy; Roy W Beck; Craig Kollman; Bruce Buckingham; Neil H White; Larry Fox; Eva Tsalikian; Stuart Weinzimer; Ana Maria Arbelaez; William V Tamborlane Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-01-03 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Siri Fredheim; Marie-Louise M Andersen; Sven Pörksen; Lotte B Nielsen; Christian Pipper; Lars Hansen; Jens J Holst; Jane Thomsen; Jesper Johannesen; Henrik B Mortensen; Jannet Svensson Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2014-12-27 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Justin M Gregory; Noelia Rivera; Guillaume Kraft; Jason J Winnick; Ben Farmer; Eric J Allen; E Patrick Donahue; Marta S Smith; Dale S Edgerton; Phillip E Williams; Alan D Cherrington Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2017-05-16 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Michael R Rickels; Carmella Evans-Molina; Henry T Bahnson; Alyssa Ylescupidez; Kristen J Nadeau; Wei Hao; Mark A Clements; Jennifer L Sherr; Richard E Pratley; Tamara S Hannon; Viral N Shah; Kellee M Miller; Carla J Greenbaum Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Erwan Leclair; Richard T Liggins; Ashley J Peckett; Trevor Teich; David H Coy; Mladen Vranic; Michael C Riddell Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2016-04-13 Impact factor: 10.122