BACKGROUND: Currently, no consensus exists on a model describing endogenous glucose production (EGP) as a function of glucagon concentrations. Reliable simulations to determine the glucagon dose preventing or treating hypoglycemia or to tune a dual-hormone artificial pancreas control algorithm need a validated glucoregulatory model including the effect of glucagon. METHODS: Eight type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients each received a subcutaneous (SC) bolus of insulin on four study days to induce mild hypoglycemia followed by a SC bolus of saline or 100, 200, or 300 µg of glucagon. Blood samples were analyzed for concentrations of glucagon, insulin, and glucose. We fitted pharmacokinetic (PK) models to insulin and glucagon data using maximum likelihood and maximum a posteriori estimation methods. Similarly, we fitted a pharmacodynamic (PD) model to glucose data. The PD model included multiplicative effects of insulin and glucagon on EGP. Bias and precision of PD model test fits were assessed by mean predictive error (MPE) and mean absolute predictive error (MAPE). RESULTS: Assuming constant variables in a subject across nonoutlier visits and using thresholds of ±15% MPE and 20% MAPE, we accepted at least one and at most three PD model test fits in each of the seven subjects. Thus, we successfully validated the PD model by leave-one-out cross-validation in seven out of eight T1D patients. CONCLUSIONS: The PD model accurately simulates glucose excursions based on plasma insulin and glucagon concentrations. The reported PK/PD model including equations and fitted parameters allows for in silico experiments that may help improve diabetes treatment involving glucagon for prevention of hypoglycemia.
BACKGROUND: Currently, no consensus exists on a model describing endogenous glucose production (EGP) as a function of glucagon concentrations. Reliable simulations to determine the glucagon dose preventing or treating hypoglycemia or to tune a dual-hormone artificial pancreas control algorithm need a validated glucoregulatory model including the effect of glucagon. METHODS: Eight type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients each received a subcutaneous (SC) bolus of insulin on four study days to induce mild hypoglycemia followed by a SC bolus of saline or 100, 200, or 300 µg of glucagon. Blood samples were analyzed for concentrations of glucagon, insulin, and glucose. We fitted pharmacokinetic (PK) models to insulin and glucagon data using maximum likelihood and maximum a posteriori estimation methods. Similarly, we fitted a pharmacodynamic (PD) model to glucose data. The PD model included multiplicative effects of insulin and glucagon on EGP. Bias and precision of PD model test fits were assessed by mean predictive error (MPE) and mean absolute predictive error (MAPE). RESULTS: Assuming constant variables in a subject across nonoutlier visits and using thresholds of ±15% MPE and 20% MAPE, we accepted at least one and at most three PD model test fits in each of the seven subjects. Thus, we successfully validated the PD model by leave-one-out cross-validation in seven out of eight T1D patients. CONCLUSIONS: The PD model accurately simulates glucose excursions based on plasma insulin and glucagon concentrations. The reported PK/PD model including equations and fitted parameters allows for in silico experiments that may help improve diabetes treatment involving glucagon for prevention of hypoglycemia.
Authors: Roman Hovorka; Fariba Shojaee-Moradie; Paul V Carroll; Ludovic J Chassin; Ian J Gowrie; Nicola C Jackson; Romulus S Tudor; A Margot Umpleby; Richard H Jones Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Aron Adkins; Rita Basu; Mai Persson; Betty Dicke; Pankaj Shah; Adrian Vella; W Frederick Schwenk; Robert Rizza Journal: Diabetes Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: P G Jacobs; J El Youssef; R Reddy; N Resalat; D Branigan; J Condon; N Preiser; K Ramsey; M Jones; C Edwards; K Kuehl; J Leitschuh; U Rajhbeharrysingh; J R Castle Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2016-08-15 Impact factor: 6.577
Authors: Saeed Masroor; Marloes G J van Dongen; Ricardo Alvarez-Jimenez; Koos Burggraaf; Lambertus A Peletier; Mark A Peletier Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 2.745
Authors: Micaela Morettini; Laura Burattini; Christian Göbl; Giovanni Pacini; Bo Ahrén; Andrea Tura Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 5.555
Authors: J Geoffrey Chase; Thomas Desaive; Julien Bohe; Miriam Cnop; Christophe De Block; Jan Gunst; Roman Hovorka; Pierre Kalfon; James Krinsley; Eric Renard; Jean-Charles Preiser Journal: Crit Care Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 9.097