Literature DB >> 23991646

Safe use of highly steatotic livers by utilizing a donor/recipient clinical algorithm.

Kenneth D Chavin1, David J Taber, Melissa Norcross, Nicole A Pilch, Heather Crego, John W McGillicuddy, Charles F Bratton, Angello Lin, Prabhakar K Baliga.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term safety and clinical outcomes associated with the utilization of highly steatotic donor livers utilizing a specific donor/recipient matching algorithm. This was a prospective, observational, single-center, 10-yr follow-up study. Highly steatotic livers were utilized according to a donor/recipient algorithm that guided the surgeon to use highly steatotic donor organs judiciously in low-risk recipients. This study initially compared fat assessment based on frozen-section Ehrlich's hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) to reperfusion biopsy fat assessment and demonstrated that H&E is an insensitive analysis to determine degree of steatosis. Patients were divided into three groups based on donor steatosis (group 1: <30% steatosis, group 2: 30-60% steatosis, group 3: >60% steatosis), and clinical outcomes were assessed. One hundred and sixteen patients were included in the analysis. Patients that received severely steatotic livers (>60% fat) showed increased reperfusion liver injury and delayed return of liver function in the early postoperative period, demonstrated by biochemical markers. However, there were no differences in primary non-function, postoperative complications, length of stay, and patient and graft survival. Using rigorous donor/recipient matching through a detailed algorithm, these data demonstrate that normal liver allograft outcomes are not superior to those in highly steatotic grafts.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Keywords:  graft survival; liver transplantation; organ allocation; patient survival; steatosis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23991646     DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  17 in total

Review 1.  Transplant for the very sick: No limitations in donor quality?

Authors:  Jennifer C Lai
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Minimizing Risks of Liver Transplantation with Steatotic Donor Livers by Preferred Recipient Matching.

Authors:  Kyle R Jackson; Jennifer D Motter; Christine E Haugen; Jane J Long; Betsy King; Benjamin Philosophe; Allan B Massie; Andrew M Cameron; Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 3.  Liver Transplantation Using Steatotic Grafts.

Authors:  Kyle R Jackson; Jane Long; Benjamin Philosophe; Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-12-20

Review 4.  Donor liver histology--a valuable tool in graft selection.

Authors:  Christa Flechtenmacher; Peter Schirmacher; Peter Schemmer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  [Donor liver histology : Joint recommendations of the DGP, DTG and DSO].

Authors:  C Schleicher; H-H Kreipe; P Schemmer; C P Strassburg; C-L Fischer-Fröhlich; A Rahmel; C Flechtenmacher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  Contemporary strategies to assess and manage liver donor steatosis: a review.

Authors:  Christine Tien; Daphne Remulla; Yong Kwon; Juliet Emamaullee
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.269

Review 7.  Donor Hepatic Steatosis and Outcome After Liver Transplantation: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Michael J J Chu; Anna J Dare; Anthony R J Phillips; Adam S J R Bartlett
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Donor Hepatic Steatosis Induce Exacerbated Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Through Activation of Innate Immune Response Molecular Pathways.

Authors:  Ricardo C Gehrau; Valeria R Mas; Catherine I Dumur; Jihee L Suh; Ashish K Sharma; Helen P Cathro; Daniel G Maluf
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Clinical outcomes and costs associated with in-hospital biliary complications after liver transplantation: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Arun P Palanisamy; D J Taber; A G Sutter; S N Nadig; J E Dowden; J W McGillicuddy; P K Baliga; K D Chavin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Expanded criteria donors.

Authors:  Sandy Feng; Jennifer C Lai
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 6.126

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.