Literature DB >> 23991253

Complete genome sequence of Halorhodospira halophila SL1.

Jean F Challacombe1, Sophia Majid, Ratnakar Deole, Thomas S Brettin, David Bruce, Susana F Delano, John C Detter, Cheryl D Gleasner, Cliff S Han, Monica Misra, Krista G Reitenga, Natalia Mikhailova, Tanja Woyke, Sam Pitluck, Matt Nolan, Miriam L Land, Elizabeth Saunders, Roxanne Tapia, Alla Lapidus, Natalia Ivanova, Wouter D Hoff.   

Abstract

Halorhodospira halophila is among the most halophilic organisms known. It is an obligately photosynthetic and anaerobic purple sulfur bacterium that exhibits autotrophic growth up to saturated NaCl concentrations. The type strain H. halophila SL1 was isolated from a hypersaline lake in Oregon. Here we report the determination of its entire genome in a single contig. This is the first genome of a phototrophic extreme halophile. The genome consists of 2,678,452 bp, encoding 2,493 predicted genes as determined by automated genome annotation. Of the 2,407 predicted proteins, 1,905 were assigned to a putative function. Future detailed analysis of this genome promises to yield insights into the halophilic adaptations of this organism, its ability for photoautotrophic growth under extreme conditions, and its characteristic sulfur metabolism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  halophile; phototrophic; purple sulfur bacterium; saturated salt; sulfur metabolism

Year:  2013        PMID: 23991253      PMCID: PMC3746430          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.3677284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

is an anoxygenic photosynthetic halophile that was isolated from salt-encrusted mud along the shore of Summer Lake in Oregon [1], and from the hypersaline Wadi Natrun lakes in Egypt [2]. The original name of this organism, was modified to when the genus was divided into two genera ( and ), and was reclassified as a member of the genus , serving as the type species of the new genus [3]. Over the last decade, the genomes of a number of extremely halophilic have been sequenced and analyzed, including [4,5], [6], [7], and [8]. In addition, the genomes of three halophilic have become available: [9], [10], and ‘ [11]. All of these organisms are obligate chemotrophs. Thus, is the first phototrophic extreme halophile to have its genome sequence determined and analyzed. In contrast to other extreme halophiles that grow well in saturated salt concentrations, has a high flexibility with respect to the salt concentrations that it tolerates, and grows optimally at all NaCl concentrations from 15% to 35%, with growth down to 3.5% NaCl [12]. In contrast, the above extremely halophilic archaea and require 15% NaCl for growth. is of significant interest because it is an obligately anaerobic purple sulfur bacterium, and among the most halophilic organisms known [13]. To date, genome sequences are available for two phototrophic purple sulfur bacteria, DSM 180 and the SL1 genome reported here. has very few growth requirements. However, it does need reduced sulfur compounds for growth, as does [14]. Its pathways for both photosynthetic electron transfer [15-17] and nitrogen fixation [18] have attracted attention. In addition, contains photoactive yellow protein [19,20]. This is the first member of a novel class of blue light receptors, and triggers a negative phototaxis response in [21]. The photoactive yellow protein (PYP) from has been studied extensively for its biophysical characteristics [22-24]. The sulfur metabolism of is unusual, resulting in the transient accumulation of extracellular sulfur globules via metabolic pathways that are not yet fully resolved [14]. While purple non-sulfur phototrophs such as and use organic compounds like malate as electron donors, obtains electrons from reduced sulfur compounds. The genome sequence of promises to reveal insights into its adaptations to hypersaline environments, and to allow a better understanding of its unique combination of metabolic capabilities, combining properties from extreme halophiles, anoxygenic phototrophs, and purple sulfur bacteria.

Classification and features

belongs to the [3] (Table 1). The 16S rRNA gene sequence of SL1 reveals closer relationships with and the other representatives of the (Figure 1), than with a purple sulfur bacterium in the family, and the haloalkaliphilic chemolithoautotrophic strains.
Table 1

Classification and general features of SL1 according to the MIGS recommendations [25].

MIGS ID    Property     Term   Evidence codea
    Current classification     Domain Bacteria   TAS [26]
     Phylum Proteobacteria   TAS [27]
     Class Gammaproteobacteria   TAS [28,29]
     Order Chromatiales   TAS [28,30]
     Family Ectothiorhodospiraceae   TAS [31]
     Genus Halorhodospira   TAS [32-34]
     Species Halorhodospira halophila   TAS [32,33]
MIGS-7    Subspecific genetic lineage     DSM 244T
    Gram stain     negative   NAS
    Cell shape     spiral   TAS [1]
    Motility     motile   TAS [1]
    Sporulation     non-sporulating   NAS
    Temperature range     mesophilic   NAS
    Optimum temperature     47°C   TAS [1]
    Carbon source     CO2, succinate, acetate   TAS [35]
    Energy source     photosynthesis   TAS [1]
MIGS-6    Habitat     salt lake mud   TAS [1]
MIGS-6.3    Salinity     Extreme halophile   TAS [1]
MIGS-22    Oxygen     anaerobe   TAS [1]
MIGS-15    Biotic relationship     free living   NAS
MIGS-14    Pathogenicity     none   NAS
MIGS-4    Geographic location     Summer Lake, Lake County, OR   TAS [1]
MIGS-5    Sample collection time     about 1967   TAS [1]
MIGS-4.1    Latitude     not reported
MIGS-4.2    Longitude     not reported
MIGS-4.3    Depth     not reported
MIGS-4.4    Altitude     not reported

aEvidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [36]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property should have been directly observed, for the purpose of this specific publication, for a live isolate by one of the authors, or an expert or reputable institution mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Figure 1

Phylogram representation of a phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of strain SL1 relative to other organisms of interest, including members of the , as well as additional strains that were included for comparison purposes, based on environmental and functional considerations. The strains (type=T) and their corresponding GenBank accession numbers (and coordinates) for 16S rRNA genes are: strain SL1T, CP00544:380025-381562; strain MLHE-1, CP00453:369818-369894; HL-EbGR7, CP001339:2548250-2549775; K90mix, CP001905:423231-424758; DSM 180T, CP001896:112452-113967; M59152; PsJN, CP001052:1541578-1543101; strain Hildenborough, AE017285:105921-107426; 2.4.1, CP000143:1-1464; ATCC 11170, CP000230: 192528-194004; B strain REL606, CP000819: 226609-228150. The 16S rRNA sequences were aligned by MUSCLE [37]. The tree was determined by the maximum likelihood model of PhyML [38] and rendered with TreeDyn [39], using the “one click” pipeline of the Phylogeny.fr web resource [40].

aEvidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [36]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property should have been directly observed, for the purpose of this specific publication, for a live isolate by one of the authors, or an expert or reputable institution mentioned in the acknowledgements. Phylogram representation of a phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of strain SL1 relative to other organisms of interest, including members of the , as well as additional strains that were included for comparison purposes, based on environmental and functional considerations. The strains (type=T) and their corresponding GenBank accession numbers (and coordinates) for 16S rRNA genes are: strain SL1T, CP00544:380025-381562; strain MLHE-1, CP00453:369818-369894; HL-EbGR7, CP001339:2548250-2549775; K90mix, CP001905:423231-424758; DSM 180T, CP001896:112452-113967; M59152; PsJN, CP001052:1541578-1543101; strain Hildenborough, AE017285:105921-107426; 2.4.1, CP000143:1-1464; ATCC 11170, CP000230: 192528-194004; B strain REL606, CP000819: 226609-228150. The 16S rRNA sequences were aligned by MUSCLE [37]. The tree was determined by the maximum likelihood model of PhyML [38] and rendered with TreeDyn [39], using the “one click” pipeline of the Phylogeny.fr web resource [40].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing to better understand its halophilic adaptations, its unusual sulfur metabolism, its photosynthetic pathways, and to provide a framework for better understanding signaling pathways for photoactive yellow protein. The complete genome sequence has been deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). Table 2 presents the project information and its association with MIGS version 2.0 compliance [25].
Table 2

Project information

MIGS ID     Property    Term
MIGS-31     Finishing quality    Finished
MIGS-28     Libraries used    40kb, 8kb, 3kb
MIGS-29     Sequencing platforms    Sanger
MIGS-31.2     Fold coverage    12×
MIGS-30     Assemblers    phrap
MIGS-32     Gene calling method    Critica
     Genbank ID    CP000544
     Genbank Date of Release    January 12, 2012
     GOLD ID    Gc00492
     Project relevance    extremophile

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

SL1 strain DSM 44T was obtained from Deutsche Sammlung vor Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (DSMZ), Braunschweig, Germany, and were grown in DSMZ 253 medium. The cells were grown anaerobically and photosynthetically by placing them in 20 ml glass culture tubes completely filled with growth medium and sealed with screw caps. The tubes were kept at 42ºC in a water bath and illuminated with 70 W tungsten light bulbs. Chromosomal DNA was purified from the resulting cell cultures using the CTAB procedure.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The random shotgun method was used in sequencing the genome of SL1. Large (40 kb), median (8 kb) and small (3 kb) insert random sequencing libraries were sequenced for this genome project with an average success rate of 88% and average high-quality read lengths of 750 nucleotides. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with Dupfinisher (unpublished, C. Han) or by transposon bombing of bridging clones (EZ-Tn5 Tnp Transposome kit, Epicentre Biotechnologies). Gaps between contigs were closed by editing, custom primer walks or PCR amplification. The completed genome sequence of SL1 contains 36,035 reads, achieving an average of 12-fold sequence coverage per base with error rate less than 1 in 100,000.

Genome annotation

Identification of putative protein-encoding genes and initial automated annotation of the genome was performed by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the IMG platform [41].

Genome properties

The genome is 2,678,452 bp long and comprises one circular chromosome with 67% GC content (Figure 2). For the main chromosome, 2,493 genes were predicted, 2,407 of which are protein-coding genes. A total of 1,905 of protein coding genes were assigned to a putative function, with the remaining annotated as hypothetical proteins. In addition, 31 pseudo genes were identified. The properties and the statistics of the genome are summarized in Tables 3-4.
Figure 2

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Circle 1, genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories); Circle 2, genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories); Circle 3, RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black); Circle 4, mobile element genes; Circle 5, CRISPR-associated protein genes; Circle 6, GC content; Circle 7, GC skew.

Table 3

Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the genome

Attribute     Value    % of total
Genome size (bp)     2,678,452    100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)     2,437,391    91%
DNA G+C content (bp)     1,794,562    67%
Total genes     2493
RNA genes     63    2.65%
rRNA operons     2
Protein-coding genes     2,407    96.55%
Pseudo genes     31    1.24%
Genes in paralog clusters     204    8.19%
Genes assigned to COGs     1,457    58.44%
Genes with signal peptides     499    20.02%
Genes with transmembrane helices     554    22.22%
Table 4

Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories

Code    Value    %agea     Description
J    147    5.9     Translation
A    1    0.0     RNA processing and modification
K    86    3.5     Transcription
L    125    5.0     Replication, recombination and repair
B    1    0.0     Chromatin structure and dynamics
D    36    1.4     Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y    0    0.0     Nuclear structure
V    29    1.2     Defense mechanisms
T    156    6.3     Signal transduction mechanisms
M    144    5.8     Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N    93    3.7     Cell motility
Z    0    0.0     Cytoskeleton
W    0    0.0     Extracellular structures
U    80    3.2     Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O    103    4.1     Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C    168    6.7     Energy production and conversion
G    76    3.1     Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E    158    6.3     Amino acid transport and metabolism
F    46    1.9     Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H    152    6.1     Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I    72    2.9     Lipid transport and metabolism
P    122    4.9     Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q    37    1.5     Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R    222    8.9     General function prediction only
S    167    6.7     Function unknown
-    493    19.8     Not in COGs

a The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Circle 1, genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories); Circle 2, genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories); Circle 3, RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black); Circle 4, mobile element genes; Circle 5, CRISPR-associated protein genes; Circle 6, GC content; Circle 7, GC skew. a The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

Conclusion

is among the most halophilic eubacteria known. Further analysis and characterization of its genome will provide insights into the mechanisms it uses to adapt to hypersaline environments.
  33 in total

1.  Study of the high-potential iron sulfur protein in Halorhodospira halophila confirms that it is distinct from cytochrome c as electron carrier.

Authors:  Clément Lieutaud; Jean Alric; Marielle Bauzan; Wolfgang Nitschke; Barbara Schoepp-Cothenet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Evolution in the laboratory: the genome of Halobacterium salinarum strain R1 compared to that of strain NRC-1.

Authors:  F Pfeiffer; S C Schuster; A Broicher; M Falb; P Palm; K Rodewald; A Ruepp; J Soppa; J Tittor; D Oesterhelt
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 5.736

3.  Identification of six new photoactive yellow proteins--diversity and structure-function relationships in a bacterial blue light photoreceptor.

Authors:  Masato Kumauchi; Miwa T Hara; Page Stalcup; Aihua Xie; Wouter D Hoff
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 3.421

4.  An extremely halophilic proteobacterium combines a highly acidic proteome with a low cytoplasmic potassium content.

Authors:  Ratnakar Deole; Jean Challacombe; Douglas W Raiford; Wouter D Hoff
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  ctothiorhodospira halophila: a new species ofthe genus Ectothiorhodospira.

Authors:  J C Raymond; W R Sistrom
Journal:  Arch Mikrobiol       Date:  1969

6.  Complete genome sequence of the haloalkaliphilic, hydrogen-producing bacterium Halanaerobium hydrogeniformans.

Authors:  Steven D Brown; Matthew B Begemann; Melanie R Mormile; Judy D Wall; Cliff S Han; Lynne A Goodwin; Samuel Pitluck; Miriam L Land; Loren J Hauser; Dwayne A Elias
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  The genome of Salinibacter ruber: convergence and gene exchange among hyperhalophilic bacteria and archaea.

Authors:  E F Mongodin; K E Nelson; S Daugherty; R T Deboy; J Wister; H Khouri; J Weidman; D A Walsh; R T Papke; G Sanchez Perez; A K Sharma; C L Nesbø; D MacLeod; E Bapteste; W F Doolittle; R L Charlebois; B Legault; F Rodriguez-Valera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Living with two extremes: conclusions from the genome sequence of Natronomonas pharaonis.

Authors:  Michaela Falb; Friedhelm Pfeiffer; Peter Palm; Karin Rodewald; Volker Hickmann; Jörg Tittor; Dieter Oesterhelt
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Genome sequence of Haloarcula marismortui: a halophilic archaeon from the Dead Sea.

Authors:  Nitin S Baliga; Richard Bonneau; Marc T Facciotti; Min Pan; Gustavo Glusman; Eric W Deutsch; Paul Shannon; Yulun Chiu; Rueyhung Sting Weng; Rueichi Richie Gan; Pingliang Hung; Shailesh V Date; Edward Marcotte; Leroy Hood; Wailap Victor Ng
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  TreeDyn: towards dynamic graphics and annotations for analyses of trees.

Authors:  François Chevenet; Christine Brun; Anne-Laure Bañuls; Bernard Jacq; Richard Christen
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  10 in total

1.  Translational Frameshifting in the chlD Gene Gives a Clue to the Coevolution of the Chlorophyll and Cobalamin Biosyntheses.

Authors:  Stepan Kuznetsov; Alexander Milenkin; Ivan Antonov
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-06-11

2.  Genomic Comparison, Phylogeny and Taxonomic Reevaluation of the Ectothiorhodospiraceae and Description of Halorhodospiraceae fam. nov. and Halochlorospira gen. nov.

Authors:  Johannes F Imhoff; John A Kyndt; Terrance E Meyer
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-01-26

3.  Insights from the metagenome of an acid salt lake: the role of biology in an extreme depositional environment.

Authors:  Sarah Stewart Johnson; Marc Gerard Chevrette; Bethany L Ehlmann; Kathleen Counter Benison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Arsenite Oxidation by a Newly Isolated Betaproteobacterium Possessing arx Genes and Diversity of the arx Gene Cluster in Bacterial Genomes.

Authors:  Melody Cabrera Ospino; Hisaya Kojima; Manabu Fukui
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Net Charges of the Ribosomal Proteins of the S10 and spc Clusters of Halophiles Are Inversely Related to the Degree of Halotolerance.

Authors:  Madhan R Tirumalai; Daniela Anane-Bediakoh; Sidharth Rajesh; George E Fox
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-12-15

6.  Adaptation to Varying Salinity in Halomonas elongata: Much More Than Ectoine Accumulation.

Authors:  Karina Hobmeier; Martina Cantone; Quynh Anh Nguyen; Katharina Pflüger-Grau; Andreas Kremling; Hans Jörg Kunte; Friedhelm Pfeiffer; Alberto Marin-Sanguino
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Draft Genome Sequence of the Extremely Halophilic Phototrophic Purple Sulfur Bacterium Halorhodospira halochloris.

Authors:  Kumar Saurabh Singh; Jared Kirksey; Wouter D Hoff; Ratnakar Deole
Journal:  J Genomics       Date:  2014-07-06

8.  Characterization of lignocellulolytic activities from a moderate halophile strain of Aspergillus caesiellus isolated from a sugarcane bagasse fermentation.

Authors:  Ramón Alberto Batista-García; Edgar Balcázar-López; Estefan Miranda-Miranda; Ayixón Sánchez-Reyes; Laura Cuervo-Soto; Denise Aceves-Zamudio; Karina Atriztán-Hernández; Catalina Morales-Herrera; Rocío Rodríguez-Hernández; Jorge Folch-Mallol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Thioarsenate Formation Coupled with Anaerobic Arsenite Oxidation by a Sulfate-Reducing Bacterium Isolated from a Hot Spring.

Authors:  Geng Wu; Liuqin Huang; Hongchen Jiang; Yue'e Peng; Wei Guo; Ziyu Chen; Weiyu She; Qinghai Guo; Hailiang Dong
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Metagenomic insights into diazotrophic communities across Arctic glacier forefields.

Authors:  Maisie V Nash; Alexandre M Anesio; Gary Barker; Martyn Tranter; Gilda Varliero; Emiley A Eloe-Fadrosh; Torben Nielsen; Thomas Turpin-Jelfs; Liane G Benning; Patricia Sánchez-Baracaldo
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 4.194

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.