Literature DB >> 23990502

Statistical and bioanalytical considerations for establishing a depletion criterion for specificity testing during immunogenicity assessment of a biotherapeutic.

R O Driscoll1, L Zhou, M Moxness, D Mytych, N Chirmule, V Jawa.   

Abstract

Immunogenicity assessment of fully human monoclonal antibody-based biotherapeutics requires sensitive and specific ligand binding assays. One of the components of specificity is the depletion of signal by a relevant biotherapeutic that is commonly based on an arbitrary depletion criterion of inhibition of the original response or reduction of the signal below the screening assay cut point (ACP). Hence, there is a need to develop a statistically derived physiologically relevant specificity criterion. We illustrate an optimization approach to determine the concentration of biotherapeutic required for the specificity evaluation. Naïve donor sample sets with and without circulating drug and antitherapeutic/drug antibody (ADA) were prepared. Next, a depletion cut point (DCP) using naïve and ADA-containing donor sets with the optimized biotherapeutic concentration was evaluated. A statistically derived design of experiment was used to establish a validated DCP. A reliable DCP requires naïve (no ADA) donors treated only with an optimized concentration of biotherapeutic. The additional DCPs generated using two distinct concentrations of ADA-spiked sample sets led to a physiologically irrelevant criterion that was not necessarily representative of real-time samples. This increased the risk of false positives or negatives. In this study, well-defined bioanalytical and statistical methods were employed to validate a DCP to confirm the presence of biotherapeutic specific ADA in human serum samples. A physiologically relevant and effective strategy to confirm specificity in immune reactive samples, especially those that are close to the ACP, is proposed through this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23990502      PMCID: PMC3787216          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-013-9523-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  15 in total

Review 1.  An overview of scientific and regulatory issues for the immunogenicity of biological products.

Authors:  P Chamberlain; A R Mire-Sluis
Journal:  Dev Biol (Basel)       Date:  2003

2.  Recommendations for the design and optimization of immunoassays used in the detection of host antibodies against biotechnology products.

Authors:  Anthony R Mire-Sluis; Yu Chen Barrett; Viswanath Devanarayan; Eugene Koren; Hank Liu; Mauricio Maia; Thomas Parish; George Scott; Gopi Shankar; Elizabeth Shores; Steven J Swanson; Gary Taniguchi; Daniel Wierda; Linda A Zuckerman
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Clinical immunogenicity specificity assessments: a platform evaluation.

Authors:  Kun Peng; Ketevan Siradze; Valerie Quarmby; Saloumeh Kadkhodayan Fischer
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 3.935

Review 4.  Assessing specificity for immunogenicity assays.

Authors:  Steven J Swanson; Narendra Chirmule
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Impact of matrix-associated soluble factors on the specificity of the immunogenicity assessment.

Authors:  Ami C Bautista; Danika Wullner; Mike Moxness; Steven J Swanson; Narendra Chirmule; Vibha Jawa
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Immunogenicity testing by electrochemiluminescent detection for antibodies directed against therapeutic human monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Michael Moxness; Suzanna Tatarewicz; Dohan Weeraratne; Nancy Murakami; Danika Wullner; Dan Mytych; Vibha Jawa; Eugen Koren; Steven J Swanson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Strategy to confirm the presence of anti-erythropoietin neutralizing antibodies in human serum.

Authors:  Sergio Sanchez; Troy Barger; Lei Zhou; Michael Hale; Daniel Mytych; Shalini Gupta; Steven J Swanson; Francesca Civoli
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.935

Review 8.  Recommendations on risk-based strategies for detection and characterization of antibodies against biotechnology products.

Authors:  Eugen Koren; Holly W Smith; Elizabeth Shores; Gopi Shankar; Deborah Finco-Kent; Bonita Rup; Yu-Chen Barrett; Viswanath Devanarayan; Boris Gorovits; Shalini Gupta; Thomas Parish; Valerie Quarmby; Michael Moxness; Steven J Swanson; Gary Taniguchi; Linda A Zuckerman; Christopher C Stebbins; Anthony Mire-Sluis
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 9.  Recommendations for the validation of immunoassays used for detection of host antibodies against biotechnology products.

Authors:  Gopi Shankar; Viswanath Devanarayan; Lakshmi Amaravadi; Yu Chen Barrett; Ronald Bowsher; Deborah Finco-Kent; Michele Fiscella; Boris Gorovits; Susan Kirschner; Michael Moxness; Thomas Parish; Valerie Quarmby; Holly Smith; Wendell Smith; Linda A Zuckerman; Eugen Koren
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.935

10.  A survey of applications of biological products for drug interference of immunogenicity assays.

Authors:  Yow-Ming C Wang; Lanyan Fang; Lin Zhou; Jie Wang; Hae-Young Ahn
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 4.200

View more
  1 in total

1.  Recommendations for Systematic Statistical Computation of Immunogenicity Cut Points.

Authors:  Viswanath Devanarayan; Wendell C Smith; Rocco L Brunelle; Mary E Seger; Kim Krug; Ronald R Bowsher
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.009

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.