Literature DB >> 21083156

Assessing specificity for immunogenicity assays.

Steven J Swanson1, Narendra Chirmule.   

Abstract

Developing sensitive and specific bioanalytical assays for measuring the immunogenicity of biological therapeutics has become an integral component of the drug-development process. The strategy for measuring these immune responses involves performing sensitive screening assays that are capable of detecting low levels of both low- and high-affinity antibodies. However, having sensitive assays inherently results in a certain rate of false-positivity. Hence, developing steps to determine specificity in these assays is important to confirm the presence of antidrug antibodies. The specificity assays are defined by the ability of an assay to score a positive result if the serum sample contains an antibody that can bind and/or neutralize the therapeutic protein. Here, we discuss the methodologies for determining specificity in the bioanalytical assays used for measuring antidrug antibodies. These methods will provide investigators and regulators with guidelines to develop and review assays to measure antidrug antibodies, which can specifically interfere with the actions of the drug and/or influence the safety profile of the therapeutic proteins.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 21083156     DOI: 10.4155/bio.09.41

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioanalysis        ISSN: 1757-6180            Impact factor:   2.681


  4 in total

1.  Statistical and bioanalytical considerations for establishing a depletion criterion for specificity testing during immunogenicity assessment of a biotherapeutic.

Authors:  R O Driscoll; L Zhou; M Moxness; D Mytych; N Chirmule; V Jawa
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Summary of confirmation cut point discussions.

Authors:  Holly W Smith; Michael Moxness; Robin Marsden
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Universal immunoassay applied during early development of large molecules to understand impact of immunogenicity on biotherapeutic exposure.

Authors:  Ami C Bautista; Hossein Salimi-Moosavi; Vibha Jawa
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Development of a method that eliminates false-positive results due to nerve growth factor interference in the assessment of fulranumab immunogenicity.

Authors:  Sheng Dai; Allen Schantz; Adrienne Clements-Egan; Michael Cannon; Gopi Shankar
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.009

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.