Literature DB >> 23984783

Impact on diabetes management of General Practice Management Plans, Team Care Arrangements and reviews.

Leelani K Wickramasinghe1, Peter Schattner, Marienne E Hibbert, Joanne C Enticott, Michael P Georgeff, Grant M Russell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether General Practice Management Plans (GPMPs), Team Care Arrangements (TCAs) and reviews of these improve the management and outcomes of patients with diabetes when supported by cdmNet, a web-based chronic disease management system; and to investigate adherence to the annual cycle of care (ACOC), as recommended in diabetes guidelines. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS AND
SETTING: A before-and-after study to analyse prospectively collected data on 577 patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus who were managed with a GPMP created using cdmNet between June 2008 and November 2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Completion of the clinical tests in the ACOC (process outcome) and values of six of these clinical measurements (clinical outcomes).
RESULTS: Significant improvements were seen after creation of a GPMP in the proportion of ACOC clinical tests completed (57.9% v 74.8%, P < 0.001), total cholesterol level (P < 0.01), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level (P < 0.001) and body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.01). Patients using GPMPs and TCAs also improved their glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level (P < 0.05). Patients followed up with irregular reviews had significant improvements in the proportion of ACOC clinical tests completed (59.2% v 77.6%, P < 0.001), total cholesterol level (P < 0.05), and BMI (P < 0.01), but patients with regular reviews had greater improvements in the proportion of ACOC clinical tests completed (58.9% v 85.0%, P < 0.001), HbA(1c) level (57.7 v 53.0 mmol/mol, P < 0.05), total cholesterol level (4.8 v 4.5 mmol/L, P < 0.05), LDL cholesterol level (2.8 v 2.4 mmol/L, P < 0.01) and diastolic blood pressure (76.0 v 74.0 mmHg, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: There were significant improvements in process and clinical outcomes for patients on a GPMP or a GPMP and TCA, particularly when these were followed up by regular reviews. Patients using cdmNet were four times more likely to have their GPMP or TCA followed up through regular reviews than the national average.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23984783     DOI: 10.5694/mja13.10161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  5 in total

1.  Using care plans to better manage multimorbidity.

Authors:  Mark Aj Morgan; Michael J Coates; James A Dunbar
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2015-06-30

2.  Does it matter who organises your health care?

Authors:  Paresh Dawda; Ian S McRae; Laurann Yen; Md Mofizul Islam; Nasser Bagheri; Tanisha Jowsey; Michelle Banfield; Anne Parkinson
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 5.120

3.  Are care plans suitable for the management of multiple conditions?

Authors:  Charlotte E Young; Frances M Boyle; Allyson J Mutch
Journal:  J Comorb       Date:  2016-10-26

4.  What matters to people with chronic conditions when accessing care in Australian general practice? A qualitative study of patient, carer, and provider perspectives.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Song; Sarah Dennis; Jean-Frédéric Levesque; Mark Fort Harris
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Does delay in planned diabetes care influence outcomes for aboriginal Australians? A study of quality in health care.

Authors:  Shu Qin Li; Steven Guthridge; Paul Lawton; Paul Burgess
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.