Literature DB >> 23984406

Hemoglobin concentration and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bunyarit Sukrat1, Chumpon Wilasrusmee, Boonying Siribumrungwong, Mark McEvoy, Chusak Okascharoen, John Attia, Ammarin Thakkinstian.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of hemoglobin effect on the pregnancy outcomes.
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and SCOPUS from January 1, 1990 to April 10, 2011. Observational studies addressing association between hemoglobin and adverse pregnancy outcomes were selected. Two reviewers independently extracted data. A mixed logistic regression was applied to assess the effects of hemoglobin on preterm birth, low birth weight, and small for gestational age.
RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included in poolings. Hemoglobin below 11 g/dL was, respectively, 1.10 (95% CI: 1.02-1.19), 1.17 (95% CI: 1.03-1.32), and 1.14 (95% CI: 1.05-1.24) times higher risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, and small for gestational age than normal hemoglobin in the first trimester. In the third trimester, hemoglobin below 11 g/dL was 1.30 (95% CI: 1.08-1.58) times higher risk of low birth weight. Hemoglobin above 14 g/dL in third trimester decreased the risk of preterm term with ORs of 0.50 (95% CI: 0.26-0.97), but it might be affected by publication bias.
CONCLUSIONS: Our review suggests that hemoglobin below 11 g/dl increases the risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, and small gestational age in the first trimester and the risk of low birth weight in the third trimester.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23984406      PMCID: PMC3741929          DOI: 10.1155/2013/769057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


1. Introduction

Anemia has been claimed to be the most common nutritional disorder in pregnancy across the world [1, 2]. The worldwide prevalence is estimated at 41.8% (95% CI: 39.9–43.8) [2] and is more common in African (57.1%, 95% CI: 52.8–61.3) pregnant women. The prevalence, however, depends on the definition of anemia, in which two definitions are commonly used, that is, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) definitions [3, 4]. Adverse pregnancy outcomes thought to be affected by anemia include maternal mortality, perinatal mortality, preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), and small for gestational age (SGA). Previous research has demonstrated a strong association between severe anemia and maternal mortality [5], but the risk of maternal mortality in pregnant women with moderate anemia (i.e., hemoglobin concentration of 40–80 g/dL) was inconclusive. The impact of anemia on other adverse pregnancy outcomes (e.g., PTB, LBW and SGA) is controversial. Some studies found significant associations [6-12], while other studies did not [13-16]; this is likely the result of different studies using different criteria or cutoff thresholds for defining anemia. In another way, some studies reported the association between high hemoglobin concentration and adverse pregnancy outcomes [17, 18]. Although a previous systematic review published in 2000 [19] reported maternal anemia in early pregnancy (<20 gestational week) increased the risk of PTB but not for LBW and SGA. Most of the included studies in this review were from developed countries, except 1 study was from African [20], and 2 studies were from China [9, 21]. Anemic pregnancy was more prevalent in developing countries; thus the effects of anemia on pregnancy outcomes in developing countries were still in question. We therefore conducted a systematic review to determine the association of hemoglobin concentration and adverse pregnancy outcomes including PTB, LBW, and SGA in each trimester of pregnancy.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Identification of Studies

Studies were identified from MEDLINE and SCOPUS from January 1, 1990 to April 10, 2011. Reference lists from selected articles, narrative reviews, and systematic reviews were also reviewed to find relevant articles that were not identified by the initial search strategies. The following search terms were used: pregnancy, pregnant women, hemoglobin/haemoglobin, anemia/anaemia, hematologic/haematologic parameter, mortality, preterm birth/delivery, low birth weight, and small for gestational age. Search strategies are clearly described in Appendix 1  in the Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/769057. Only human studies published in English were considered.

2.2. Study Selection

Eligibility assessment was performed by one reviewer using the following inclusion criteria. Any observational study (i.e., case control or cohort) performed in singleton pregnancy that assessed the association between hemoglobin concentration and any adverse pregnancy outcomes (i.e., still births, neonatal mortality, perinatal mortality, LBW, PTB, and SGA) reported gestational age at the time of hemoglobin testing and had sufficient data to allow calculation of the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval for dichotomous outcomes, number of subjects, mean and standard deviation according to hemoglobin concentration groups for continuous outcomes.

2.3. Data Extraction

The data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Data on study characteristics (i.e., maternal age, ethnicity, gestational age at first antenatal visit, gestational age at delivery, parity, number of antenatal care visits, and smoking), mean and standard deviation of continuous outcomes, and frequencies of crosstabulation between each hemoglobin group and outcome for categorical data were extracted. Any disagreement was resolved by consensus between the two reviewers. If no agreement could be reached, it was adjudicated by a third reviewer.

2.4. Risk of Bias Assessment

A risk of bias assessment was independently performed by 2 reviewers. The tool use was modified from meta-analysis for genetic association studies using epidemiological part [22]. Four domains were assessed, which were representativeness of subjects, ascertainment of outcomes, ascertainment of exposures, and confounding bias. Disagreements between the two reviewers were solved by the third author.

2.5. Outcomes of Interest

The outcomes of interests were PTB, LBW, and SGA. Briefly, LBW was defined as a newborn with weight at birth of less than 2500 g. PTB was defined as a neonate born before 37 weeks gestational age (the 259th day). SGA was a newborn whose birth weight was below the 10th percentile for gestational age.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Characteristics of all included studies were described including study design, number of participants, hemoglobin cutoff, trimester, and pregnancy outcomes. Hemoglobin concentration was categorized as <9, <10, <11, 11–13.9, and ≥14 g/dL in mutually exclusive fashion for each study. To assess hemoglobin effects, data were pooled separately according to the trimester and pregnancy outcomes using the cutoff of 11–13.9 g/dL as the reference group. To compare pregnancy outcomes between multiple hemoglobin cutoffs in the same time, summary data of hemoglobin cutoffs and outcome groups were then expanded to individual patient data using the expand command in STATA. A mixed logit model with a random intercept (i.e., to account for between-study variation) was applied to assess hemoglobin effects on pregnancy outcome. The estimated pooled odds ratio (OR) along with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated by exponential logit coefficients. A degree of heterogeneity was estimated using multivariate meta-analysis method [23]. All analyses were performed using STATA version 12. The statistical significance was set to two-sided P < 0.05 for all analyses.

3. Results

Eighty-five potentially relevant articles were identified, of which 65 studies were excluded, leaving 20 studies [7, 9–12, 15–18, 24–34] for data extraction. The reasons for exclusion are described in Figure 1. Characteristics of all included studies are summarized in Table 1. Briefly, 50% percent of included studies were prospective cohorts. Mean age ranged from 16.1 to 30.6 years. Most of the eligible studies included pregnant women from Asian populations (12 studies), followed by European (4 studies), Africans (2 studies), and North Americans (2 studies). PTB, LBW, and SGA were outcomes of interests in 15, 14, and 6 studies, respectively. Still births, neonatal deaths, and perinatal deaths were less frequently reported only in 5, 3, and 4 studies, respectively, and we therefore did not pool these outcomes. The number of studies available for analyses according to trimester and outcome is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Flow of study selection.

Table 1

Characteristics of included studies.

Authors, year (Reference number)Study designSample sizeMean ageCountry TrimesterPregnancy outcomesConfounding factors
Abeysena et al., 2010 [17]Prospective cohort81726.4 ± 5.5Sri LankaFirstPTB, LBW, and SGANot specify

Kumar et al., 2010 [34]Prospective cohort2,02724.6 ± 3.82IndiaFirst LBWMaternal age, parity, maternal height, maternal weight, BMI, and gestational age

Kidanto et al., 2009 [32]Case control1,72124a TanzaniaFirst PTB, LBW, and SBNot specify

Zhang et al., 2009 [16]Prospective cohort160,700NAChinaFirst Second Third PTBMaternal age at delivery, education, occupation, parity, folic acid, BMI, time of first prenatal visit, and fetal gender

Zhang et al., 2009 [33]Prospective cohort164,667NAChinaFirst Second Third SB, NDMaternal age at delivery, education, occupation, parity, folic acid, BMI, time of first prenatal visit, and fetal gender

Ren et al., 2007 [12]Retrospective cohort88,14925.8 ± 2.9ChinaFirst PTB, LBW, and SGAMaternal age, gravidity, education, and BMI

Lee et al., 2006 [29]Prospective cohort24830.6 ± 3.35KoreaThird PTB, LBWNot specify

Mamun et al., 2006 [30]Retrospective cohort1,58422.1 ± 4.3BangladeshSecond SB, PDNot specify

Monawar Hosain et al., 2006 [31]Prospective cohort350NABangladeshFirstLBWNot specify

Levy et al., 2005 [11]Retrospective cohort153,39628.3 ± 5.9IraelFirst PTB, LBW, and PDEthnicity, maternal age, placental problems, caesarean delivery, and nonvertex presentation

Little et al., 2005 [15]Retrospective cohort222,614NAEnglandFirst STB, NDPrematurity, birth weight

Ronnenberg et al., 2004 [10]Prospective cohort40524.9 ± 1.5ChinaFirst PTB, LBWMaternal age, height, BMI, education, exposure to dust, noise, passive smoking, work stress, infant gender, and gestational age

Chang et al., 2003 [26]Retrospective cohort91816.1 ± 1.1USASecond Third PTB, LBWParity, BMI, smoking, preeclampsia, and antenatal care

Hämäläinen et al., 2003 [27]Case control22,79928.9 ± 5.2FinlandFirst Second Third PTB, LBW, SGA, and PDNot specify

Xiong et al., 2003 [28]Retrospective cohort16,93625.0 ± 2.8ChinaFirst PTB, LBW, and PDHospital stay, maternal age, maternal education, parity, gestational age at the first prenatal visit, BMI, hypertensive disorder in pregnancy, vaginal bleeding, and prior spontaneous abortion

Martí et al., 2001 [25]Case control54324.1 ± 6.6VenezuelaThird PTBPlacenta abruption, PROM, previous premature labor, ANC visit, and antenatal bleeding

Zhou et al., 1998 [9]Prospective cohort82925.5 ± 3.8ChinaFirst PTB, LBW, and SGANot specify

Onadeko et al., 1996 [24]Prospective cohort4,649NANigeriaThird LBW, SBNot specify

Rasmussen and Oian, 1993 [18]Retrospective cohort3,074NANorwayFirst Second PTB, SGANot specify

Knottnerus et al., 1990 [7]Prospective cohort79627a NetherlandThird PTB, LBWPregnancy induced hypertension

aMedian. LBW: low birth weight; NA: not available; ND: neonatal deaths; PD: perinatal deaths; PTB: preterm birth; SGA: small for gestational age; SB: still births.

Risk of bias was performed independently by the two reviewers with the total agreement rate of 98.75% with the kappa statistic of 0.946 (P < 0.001). For those items where there were disagreements, the senior reviewer (AT) had performed risk of bias and made decisions. Results of assessments for individual studies were described in Supplementary Table 1. The highest quality was in the domain of ascertainment of outcome (100.0% low risk) followed by representativeness of subjects (95.0%), while the lowest was ascertainment of hemoglobin test or definition (70.0%).

3.1. Preterm Birth

Eleven studies [9–12, 16–18, 27, 28, 32, 34] assessed the association between hemoglobin concentration in the first trimester and PTB. The use of hemoglobin cutoffs varied from ≤7 to ≥16 g/dL (Supplementary Table 2); we therefore recategorized the cutoffs as <9, <10, <11, 11–13.9, and ≥14 g/dL with the number of pregnant women totaling 192,870. The mixed logistic model with random intercept was applied by fitting hemoglobin cutoffs in the model using the cutoff of 11–13.9 g/dL as the reference group. The results suggested that pregnant women with hemoglobin concentration below 9, 10, and 11 g/dL had, respectively, 72% (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.30–2.26), 33% (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.17–1.52), and 10% (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02–1.29) higher risk of PTBs compared with pregnant women with hemoglobin concentration 11–13.9 g/dL. Hemoglobin above 14 g/dL did not increase the risk (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.86–1.14); see Table 2 and Figure 2. Pooling hemoglobin effects were homogenous across studies with degrees of heterogeneity of 4% (95% CI: 0–45), 10% (95% CI: 0–59), and 5% (95% CI: 0–44) for hemoglobin cutoffs <9, <10, and <11 g/dL, respectively. For hemoglobin cutoffs >14 g/dL, the degree of heterogeneity was moderately heterogeneous with I 2 equal to 31 (95% CI: 0–74). There was no evidence of small study effect suggested by Egger tests with coefficients of 0.018 (P = 0.849), 0.667 (P = 0.745), 0.502 (P = 0.740), and 0.127 (P = 0.672), respectively.
Table 2

Association between hemoglobin concentration and pregnancy outcomes.

OutcomeTrimesterNumber of studiesNumber of subjectsHemoglobin cutoffPooled OR95% CI I 2 95% CI
Preterm birthFirst<91.721.30–2.2640–45
11192,870<101.331.17–1.52100–59
<111.101.02–1.1950–44
Reference11–13.91.00
≥140.990.86–1.14310–74
Third <93.411.38–8.4200–6
729,879<102.641.19–5.8600–45
<111.180.83–1.70450–83
Reference11–13.91.00
≥140.500.26–0.9700–48

Low birth weightFirst<92.141.57–2.9100–11
10106,892<101.571.30–1.9070–43
<111.171.03–1.3220–38
Reference11–13.91.00  
≥140.890.70–1.13440–84
Third69,285<103.611.83–7.1200–50
<111.301.08–1.58580–91
Reference11–13.91.00
≥140.590.14–2.5000

Small for gestational ageFirst<91.370.73–2.5670–60
694,280<101.261.09–1.4510–47
<111.141.05–1.2420–55
Reference11–13.91.00
≥140.970.84–1.12200–68
Figure 2

Pooling effects of hemoglobin concentration on pregnancy outcomes in the first trimester.

Subgroup analysis was performed according to the countries (i.e., developed versus developing countries) where studies were conducted. This suggested that hemoglobin effects in developing countries (n = 9 studies) [9–12, 16, 17, 28, 32, 34] were similar to the overall effects with the pooled ORs of 1.69 (95% CI: 1.28–2.23), 1.34 (95% CI: 1.17–1.53), 1.10 (95% CI: 1.02–1.19), and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.80–1.08) for hemoglobin cutoffs <9, <10, <11, and ≥14 g/dL, respectively. However, the hemoglobin effects were lower and nonsignificant in developed countries (n = 2 studies) [18, 27] compared with developing countries with the pooled ORs of 1.17 (95% CI: 0.47–2.93) and 1.21 (95% CI: 0.59–2.51) for the cutoffs of <10 and <11 g/dL, respectively. We also pooled data by type of study designs (i.e., cohort versus case-control studies). The result from 9 cohort studies [9–12, 16–18, 28, 34] were also similar to the overall effects with the pooled ORs of 2.91 (95% CI: 1.79–4.74), 1.34 (95% CI: 1.17–1.53), 1.09 (95% CI: 1.01–1.18), and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.86–1.14), respectively. The increased risk of lower hemoglobin concentration on pregnancy outcomes was also observed in the third trimester following pooling of 7 studies [7, 16, 25–29] with total sample size of 29,879 women. The odds of having PTB was significantly higher in hemoglobin <9 and <10 but not for <11 g/dL when compared with normal hemoglobin with the pooled ORs of 3.41 (95% CI: 1.38–8.42), 2.64 (95% CI: 1.19–5.86), and 1.18 (95% CI: 0.87–1.58), respectively. Conversely, the odds of PTB was 50% reduction (OR =0.50, 95% CI: 0.26–0.97) in hemoglobin ≥14 g/dL; see Table 2 and Figure 3. There was no heterogeneity across studies except for pooling hemoglobin <11 g/dL that was moderately heterogeneous (I 2 = 45, 95% CI 0–83). There was no evidence of small study effect suggested by the Egger tests with coefficient of 0.168 (P = 0.932), −0.445 (P = 0.385), and 0.254 (P = 0.666) for hemoglobin <9, <10, and <11 g/dL, respectively. The Egger test suggested small study effect in group of hemoglobin ≥14 g/dL with coefficient of 0.113 (P = 0.045). A subgroup analysis was performed and suggested that there was no hemoglobin effect in developing countries (n = 4 studies) with the pooled OR of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.60–1.50) for hemoglobin <11 g/dL; conversely for developed countries, the odds of PTBs were 3.78 (95% CI: 1.49–9.55), 3.44 (95% CI: 1.54–7.72), 1.66 (95% CI: 0.95–2.92), and 0.53 (95% CI: 0.27–1.03) for hemoglobin cutoffs <9, <10, <11, and ≥14 g/dL compared with hemoglobin 11–13.9 g/dL.
Figure 3

Pooling effects of hemoglobin concentration on pregnancy outcomes in the third trimester.

3.2. Low Birth Weight

Ten studies [9–12, 17, 27, 28, 31, 32, 34] assessed the association between low hemoglobin concentration in the first trimester and LBW with hemoglobin concentration ranging from 7 to 16 g/dL (Supplementary Table 3). Nine studies [9–12, 17, 28, 31, 32, 34] were conducted in developing countries. The mixed logit model suggested that hemoglobin concentration below 9, 10, and 11 g/dL had, respectively, 2.14 (95% CI: 1.57–2.91), 1.57 (95% CI: 1.30–1.90), and 1.17 (95% CI: 1.03–1.32) times significantly higher risk of LBW, whereas hemoglobin ≥14 g/dL did not increase the risk (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.70–1.13) when compared with pregnant women with hemoglobin concentration 11–13.9 g/dL (Table 2 and Figure 2). The individual ORs were homogeneous across studies for pooling low hemoglobin groups (I 2 ranged from 0% to 7%) but moderately heterogeneous for hemoglobin ≥ 14 g/dL (I 2 = 44%). The Egger test was applied and suggested no evidence of small study effect with coefficients of −0.019 (P = 0.322), 0.140 (P = 0.513), 0.076 (P = 0.725), and 0.251 (P = 0.474) for the cutoffs below 9, 10, 11, and above 14 g/dL, respectively. Pooling studies in developing countries and in cohort studies did not change much results (data were not shown). Six studies [7, 17, 24, 27–29] reported an association between hemoglobin concentration and LBW in the third trimester with hemoglobin cutoff ranged from <10 to <11 g/dL (Table 2). The mixed logistic model was applied and yielded estimated ORs of 3.61 (95% CI: 1.83–7.12), 1.30 (95% CI: 1.08–1.58), and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.14–2.50) for hemoglobin cutoff <10, <11, and ≥14 compared with hemoglobin concentration 11–13.9 g/dL, respectively (Table 2). This suggest that pregnant women with hemoglobin concentration lower than 10 and 11 g/dL in the third trimester were at approximately 3.6 and 1.3 times higher risk, respectively, of having a LBW newborn than pregnant women with hemoglobin concentration of 11–13.9 g/dL. The degrees of heterogeneity were mild (I 2 = 0%, 95% CI: 0–50) and moderate (I 2 = 58%, 95% CI: 0–85), respectively, without any evidence of small study effects, with the corresponding coefficients of −0.126 (P = 0.226) and −0.58 (P = 0.937), respectively. Pooling within 4 studies in developing countries and 9 cohort studies gave similar results (data were not shown).

3.3. Small for Gestational Age

Effects of low hemoglobin concentration in the first trimester on SGA were assessed in 6 studies [9, 12, 17, 18, 27, 28] with the sample size totaling 94, 280 women (Supplementary Table 4). The mixed logistic model suggested that hemoglobin concentrations below 10 and 11 g/dL increased the risk of SGA by 26% (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.09–1.45) and 14% (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.05–1.24), respectively (Table 2 and Figure 2). The hemoglobin effects were mildly heterogeneous for both cutoffs with the I 2 of 1% and 2%. There was no evidence of small study effects as suggested by the Egger test with coefficients of −0.124 (P = 0.402) and 0.229 (P = 0.645), respectively. Pooling effects in 4 studies conducted in developing countries did not change much results (data were not shown).

4. Discussion

We have performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess effects of hemoglobin concentration on pregnancy outcomes according to trimesters. Our results suggest that lower hemoglobin concentration is associated with a higher risk of poor pregnancy outcomes in both first and third trimesters. The risk of PTB, LBW, and small gestational age was approximately 10–17% and 26–57% higher in pregnant women who had a hemoglobin concentration below 10 and 11 g/dL in the first trimester, respectively. In the third trimester, hemoglobin below 11 g/dL increases the risk of LBW by 30% but not for preterm term. Hemoglobin below 10 g/dL in the third trimester also increases the risk of PTB and LBW by 2.6 and 3.6 times, respectively. Hemoglobin ≥14 g/dL did not increase risk in any trimester of pregnancy but conversely reduced a risk of PTB by 50%. Our results confirm the findings from a previous meta-analysis [19] showing that low hemoglobin concentration in early pregnancy (<20 weeks gestation) was associated with PTB. In addition, we also found that low hemoglobin concentration in the first trimester was a risk of LBW and SGA, which has not been reported in the previous review. These findings may be explained by reduced oxygen transportation from the mother to fetus and may reflect inadequate iron reserves during early pregnancy. Subgroup analysis did not show any clear differences in the effects of low hemoglobin concentration between developing and developed countries. The magnitude of the effect in developing countries was similar to results of other previous studies [35-37]. Pooling studies based on cohorts only did not change the results when compared to pooling all studies with cohorts and case controls. Our study has a number of strengths. We assessed effects of various hemoglobin cutoffs on pregnancy outcomes stratified by trimesters. The use of hemoglobin cutoff in individual studies varied from 7 to 16 g/dL, and one study had more than one cutoff. We therefore applied a mixed logistic model in order to simultaneously assess hemoglobin effects without inflating type one error. Between-study variations were also taken into account in the mixed logistic model. A degree of heterogeneity was also estimated using multivariate meta-analysis method. There are, however, some limitations and caveats with our study. Because of the varying cutoffs used in different studies, the only way to reasonably pool data was to expand the summary data to individual level data and then pool based on common thresholds; thus some subjects were excluded if studies used a reference cutoff lower than 11 g/dL. It is also possible that our results are confounded by other factors in which analysis based on summary data could not adjust for. A meta-analysis of individual patient data should be conducted to calibrate hemoglobin cutoff with adjusting for confounders; that is, anemia is a marker of general poor health in developing countries but not in developed countries. Our review also excluded non-English articles due to limitation in translation issue.

5. Conclusion

Our review suggests that hemoglobin below 11 g/dL increases the risk of LBW in both first and third trimesters, PTB and small gestational age in the first trimester. Conversely, hemoglobin 14 g/dL or higher can conversely reduce the risk of PTB in the third trimester, but the result might be affected by publication bias. Appendix S1 described search strategies that were used for PubMed and SCOPUS search engines. Table S1 described results of risk of bias assessments for individual included studies. Table S2 provided summary data for preterm birth in first, second and third trimester of pregnancy according to different levels of hemoglobin concentration for each individual study. Table S3 provided summary data for low birth weight in first, second and third trimester of pregnancy according to different levels of hemoglobin concentration for each individual study. Table S4 provided summary data for small for gestational age in first, second and third trimester of pregnancy according to different levels of hemoglobin concentration for each individual study. Click here for additional data file.
  34 in total

1.  Risk factors for neonatal encephalopathy in Kathmandu, Nepal, a developing country: unmatched case-control study.

Authors:  M Ellis; N Manandhar; D S Manandhar; A M Costello
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-06

2.  Low birthweight at a Papua New Guinea highlands hospital.

Authors:  H R Peters; J D Vince; H Friesen
Journal:  J Trop Pediatr       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.165

3.  Hemoglobin concentrations influence birth outcomes in pregnant African-American adolescents.

Authors:  Shih-Chen Chang; Kimberly O O'Brien; Maureen Schulman Nathanson; Jeri Mancini; Frank R Witter
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 4.  An analysis of anemia and pregnancy-related maternal mortality.

Authors:  B J Brabin; M Hakimi; D Pelletier
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Nutritional anaemias. Report of a WHO group of experts.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  1972

6.  High and low hemoglobin levels during pregnancy: differential risks for preterm birth and small for gestational age.

Authors:  K S Scanlon; R Yip; L A Schieve; M E Cogswell
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Association between prematurity and maternal anemia in Venezuelan pregnant women during third trimester at labor.

Authors:  A Martí; G Peña-Martí; S Muñoz; F Lanas; G Comunian
Journal:  Arch Latinoam Nutr       Date:  2001-03

8.  Anemia during pregnancy in a Chinese population.

Authors:  X Xiong; P Buekens; W D Fraser; Z Guo
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.561

9.  Preconception hemoglobin and ferritin concentrations are associated with pregnancy outcome in a prospective cohort of Chinese women.

Authors:  Alayne G Ronnenberg; Richard J Wood; Xiaobin Wang; Houxun Xing; Chanzhong Chen; Dafang Chen; Wenwei Guang; Aiqun Huang; Lihua Wang; Xiping Xu
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  Anaemia in the first but not in the second or third trimester is a risk factor for low birth weight.

Authors:  Henna Hämäläinen; Katja Hakkarainen; Seppo Heinonen
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.324

View more
  17 in total

1.  The development of a prediction model for arrest of labour to be used at regular check-ups, during 36 or 37 gestational weeks, for primiparas: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Noriko Furuita; Satoe Okabayashi; Ayumi Yamanishi; Misako Nakamura; Takashi Kawamura
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Impact of maternal hemoglobin concentration on fetal outcomes in adolescent pregnant women.

Authors:  Leila Alizadeh; Azam Raoofi; Leili Salehi; Mani Ramzi
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 0.611

Review 3.  Maternal Anemia during pregnancy and infant low birth weight: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shoboo Rahmati; Ali Delpishe; Milad Azami; Mohammed Reza Hafezi Ahmadi; Kurosh Sayehmiri
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2017-03

4.  Smartphone based optical spectrometer for diffusive reflectance spectroscopic measurement of hemoglobin.

Authors:  Perry Edwards; Chenji Zhang; Baigang Zhang; Xiangqian Hong; Vivek K Nagarajan; Bing Yu; Zhiwen Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Prevalence and Correlates of Asymptomatic Malaria and Anemia on First Antenatal Care Visit among Pregnant Women in Southeast, Tanzania.

Authors:  Eulambius M Mlugu; Omary Minzi; Appolinary A R Kamuhabwa; Eleni Aklillu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  High and Low Haemoglobin Levels in Early Pregnancy Are Associated to a Higher Risk of Miscarriage: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Andrés Díaz-López; Blanca Ribot; Josep Basora; Victoria Arija
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes among Women Practicing Poor Sanitation in Rural India: A Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Bijaya K Padhi; Kelly K Baker; Ambarish Dutta; Oliver Cumming; Matthew C Freeman; Radhanatha Satpathy; Bhabani S Das; Pinaki Panigrahi
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Maternal haemoglobin concentrations before and during pregnancy and stillbirth risk: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Siavash Maghsoudlou; Sven Cnattingius; Olof Stephansson; Mohsen Aarabi; Shahriar Semnani; Scott M Montgomery; Shahram Bahmanyar
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Maternal Hemoglobin Levels during Pregnancy and their Association with Birth Weight of Neonates.

Authors:  F Moghaddam Tabrizi; S Barjasteh
Journal:  Iran J Ped Hematol Oncol       Date:  2015-12-10

Review 10.  Maternal Anemia and Low Birth Weight: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ana C M G Figueiredo; Isaac S Gomes-Filho; Roberta B Silva; Priscilla P S Pereira; Fabiana A F Da Mata; Amanda O Lyrio; Elivan S Souza; Simone S Cruz; Mauricio G Pereira
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.