| Literature DB >> 23984341 |
Mariem Ben Rekaya1, Manel Jerbi, Olfa Messaoud, Ahlem Sabrine Ben Brick, Mohamed Zghal, Chiraz Mbarek, Ashraf Chadli-Debbiche, Meriem Jones, Mourad Mokni, Hamouda Boussen, Mohamed Samir Boubaker, Becima Fazaa, Houda Yacoub-Youssef, Sonia Abdelhak.
Abstract
Xeroderma Pigmentosum (XP) is a rare recessive autosomal cancer prone disease, characterized by UV hypersensitivity and early appearance of cutaneous and ocular malignancies. We investigated four unrelated patients suspected to be XP-C. To confirm linkage to XPC gene, genotyping and direct sequencing of XPC gene were performed. Pathogenic effect of novel mutations was confirmed by reverse Transciptase PCR. Mutation screening revealed the presence of two novel mutations g.18246G>A and g.18810G>T in the XPC gene (NG_011763.1). The first is present in one patient XP50NEF, but the second is present in three unrelated patients (XP16KEB, XP28SFA, and XP45GB). These 3 patients are from three different cities of Southern Tunisia and bear the same haplotype, suggesting a founder effect. Reverse Transciptase PCR revealed the absence of the XPC mRNA. In Tunisia, as observed in an other severe genodermatosis, the mutational spectrum of XP-C group seems to be homogeneous with some clusters of heterogeneity that should be taken into account to improve molecular diagnosis of this disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23984341 PMCID: PMC3741899 DOI: 10.1155/2013/316286
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Sequence primers used for PCR amplification of XPC and GAPDH genes.
| PCR | Primer Sense | Primer Anti-sense |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XPC | Exon 4 | ATGCCTCACTTCCTCCTTCC | CACTTTGATACTCAGTCCTGGTCCC | 55 |
| Exon 5 | GATTCACTGTCATCCGAGGAGAAG | CAAAGGCTCAGAGAGAGTAAGAAACTTG | 55 | |
| Exon 6 | TGAAAGACAAGACCAAAACAAAAACAG | GACCTGAACCCAGCCTCTGAG | 55 | |
| Exon 7 | CTCCCTCTTTTTATTTTCTTGGCTG | GGTGCCTGTAGGCATTTGATAAAGC | 55 | |
| Exon 8 | TTGAACAAGCACCATAACAAACAAC | TGCCCAAGTCTTCCCTAACACAG | 55 | |
| Exon 9 | CCAGGGTGTCTTATAAAGAGG | CAAGGCCTTACCTCCAAG | 55 | |
| Exon 10 | CCTTGGCTCCACCATCTGTTG | CCCTGTAACTGTTTTTCCCCTGC | 60 | |
| Exon 11 | AGATTAGGGTTTGTAAGTGGACACATC | GGACTGGGAGGCTCATCATCAC | 55 | |
| Exon 12 | CTGGTAGGTGTGTTCTGAGGGTTC | CGGTGTAGATTGGGCAGGTTC | 60 | |
| Exon 13 | GGCAGCATCAGAAGGGCTCAG | AAATCCAGTGTAACATCCTGAAAATTG | 60 | |
| Exon 14 | AGGCTGGATAGGGGCTTTCAC | CCTGCTGTATTCAGTGCTCGCTC | 60 | |
| Exon 15 | CCACTAAAGATTTTGGAGTCAGTAACG | ACAGGGCTTGGGGCAGAAGAG | 55 | |
| Exon 16 | CCCTTGTCCTCCCAGAGTTACAC | ATGCTGCCTCAGTTTGCCTTC | 60 | |
| cDNA | TTGAAGAACTTAGTGAGCCTGTG | GCTGGGTTGCCTTCTCCT | 60 | |
|
| ||||
| GAPDH | cDNA | GAGTCAACGGATTTGGTCGT | TTGATT TTGGAGGGATCTCG | 60 |
Clinical features of the XP-C patients.
| Patients code | Sex | Age at first consultation | Age | City geographic |
Age at onset of the first skin tumor | Internal cancer (age at onset) | Protection from UVR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MM | BCC | SCC | |||||||
| XP16KEB | M | 2 | 7 | Kebelli | — | — | — | — | +++ |
| XP28SFA | F | 3 | 21 | Sfax | — | 17 (1) | — | Benign articular tumor of the knee (18) | +++ |
| XP45GB | F | 2 | 18 | Gafsa | 17 (1) | 8 (>20) | 9 (>10) | Thyroid cancer (16) | + |
| XP50NEF | M | 6 | 22 | Nefta | 17 (1) | 11 (>5) | 17 (1) | — | + |
MM: melanoma; BCC: Basal Cell Carcinoma; SCC: Spino Cell Carcinoma; +++: high protection; +: low protection.
Figure 3Agarose gel electrophoretic analysis of the RT-PCR showed the absence of the XPC cDNA amplification for XP50NEF and XP45GB patients compared to healthy control. The cDNA of the GAPDH gene was successfully amplified for all individuals. The variability of intensity of amplification between XP45GA patient and control is due to the quality of conservation of the blood sample. (M: 1 kb DNA ladder molecular size marker (GeneRuler)).
Microsatellite markers surrounding the XPC locus.
| Microsatellites markers | Physical distance (pb) | Genetic location (cM) | Heterozygosity | Number of alleles | Primers sequence | Allele size range | Fluorescence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D3S3602 | 13.926.066–13.926.191 | 31.40 | 57.69% | 7 | F: AAAATCCTAACCCAAAATGT | 114–132 | FAM |
|
| |||||||
| D3S1585 | 13.941.728–13.941.855 | 33.00 | 57.14% | 8 | F: TGCACGAGCCAGAAGT | 126–144 | NED |
|
| |||||||
| D3S3613 | 15.361.998–15.362.181 | 35.70 | 78.57% | 8 | F: CATCTATGTGGCAATCGG | 172–208 | FAM |
Figure 1(a) Pedigrees and haplotype analysis for the XP45GB, XP16KEB, and XP28SFA patients. The disease haplotype is indicated by shading. m, mutant allele; N, normal allele; ND, not determined. (b) Clinical photographs of investigated XP-C patients showing clinical variability despite genetic homogeneity. (*) Dermoscopic examination of XP28SFA patient showing polymorphic pigmented and achromic macula. (c) Genomic DNA sequence showing the G to T substitution in the exon 7 of the XPC gene in homozygous state (1) or in a heterozygous parent (2) which is compared to the wild-type sequence of a control (3).
Figure 2(a) Pedigree and haplotype analysis for the XP50NEF family. The disease haplotype is indicated by shading. m, mutant allele; N, normal allele; ND, not determined. (b) Clinical photograph of XP50NEF patient (1: melanoma; 2: angiogranuloma; 3: BCC). The sequence electropherogram of the sense strand in exon 6 of XPC gene showing the G>A substitution in homozygous state (a) in comparison with the wild type sequence (b) or in a heterozygous parent (c).