BACKGROUND: Sea lice infection is the most expensive disease factor for Atlantic salmon sea-cage farming. For triploid salmon to be accepted as a commercial possibility, investigation of susceptibility of triploid salmon to sea lice infection is a fundamental milestone. The susceptibility of diploid and triploid salmon to infection with Lepeophtheirus salmonis was examined in a tank trial in Scotland, a tank trial in Norway and a cage trial in Scotland. RESULTS: Following a single infection challenge, results indicated a significant correlation between fish size and the number of attached sea lice. Triploid fish were larger than diploids at the smolt stage. In the tank trials, no difference was found between infection levels on diploids and triploids after a single infection challenge. The tank trial in Scotland continued with a second infection challenge of the same fish, which also showed no infection differences between ploidies. A borderline correlation between first infection and re-infection intensity was found for PIT-tagged diploid salmon examined after each challenge. No significant difference in louse infection between diploid and triploid salmon (∼2 kg) was found in the cage trial undertaken under commercial conditions. CONCLUSION: This study concludes that triploid Atlantic salmon are not more susceptible to sea louse infection than diploid fish.
BACKGROUND:Sea lice infection is the most expensive disease factor for Atlantic salmon sea-cage farming. For triploid salmon to be accepted as a commercial possibility, investigation of susceptibility of triploid salmon to sea lice infection is a fundamental milestone. The susceptibility of diploid and triploid salmon to infection with Lepeophtheirus salmonis was examined in a tank trial in Scotland, a tank trial in Norway and a cage trial in Scotland. RESULTS: Following a single infection challenge, results indicated a significant correlation between fish size and the number of attached sea lice. Triploid fish were larger than diploids at the smolt stage. In the tank trials, no difference was found between infection levels on diploids and triploids after a single infection challenge. The tank trial in Scotland continued with a second infection challenge of the same fish, which also showed no infection differences between ploidies. A borderline correlation between first infection and re-infection intensity was found for PIT-tagged diploid salmon examined after each challenge. No significant difference in louse infection between diploid and triploid salmon (∼2 kg) was found in the cage trial undertaken under commercial conditions. CONCLUSION: This study concludes that triploid Atlantic salmon are not more susceptible to sea louse infection than diploid fish.
Authors: Eric H Ignatz; Tiago S Hori; Surendra Kumar; Tillmann J Benfey; Laura M Braden; C Dawn Runighan; Jillian D Westcott; Matthew L Rise Journal: Front Genet Date: 2022-05-23 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Kevin A Glover; Abdullah S Madhun; Geir Dahle; Anne G E Sørvik; Vidar Wennevik; Øystein Skaala; H Craig Morton; Tom J Hansen; Per G Fjelldal Journal: BMC Genet Date: 2015-04-11 Impact factor: 2.797
Authors: Lynn Chalmers; John F Taylor; William Roy; Andrew C Preston; Herve Migaud; Alexandra Adams Journal: Parasitology Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Tharangani K Herath; Angela J Ashby; Nilantha S Jayasuriya; James E Bron; John F Taylor; Alexandra Adams; Randolph H Richards; Manfred Weidmann; Hugh W Ferguson; John B Taggart; Herve Migaud; Mark J Fordyce; Kim D Thompson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-09-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lindsey J Moore; Tom Ole Nilsen; Jiraporn Jarungsriapisit; Per Gunnar Fjelldal; Sigurd O Stefansson; Geir Lasse Taranger; Sonal Patel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-04-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lynn Chalmers; Herve Migaud; Alexandra Adams; Luisa M Vera; Elsbeth McStay; Ben North; Chris Mitchell; John F Taylor Journal: Fish Shellfish Immunol Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 4.581
Authors: Lynn Chalmers; Kim D Thompson; John F Taylor; Sean Black; Herve Migaud; Ben North; Alexandra Adams Journal: Fish Shellfish Immunol Date: 2016-08-25 Impact factor: 4.581
Authors: Lynn Chalmers; Luisa M Vera; John F Taylor; Alexandra Adams; Herve Migaud Journal: Fish Shellfish Immunol Date: 2018-07-25 Impact factor: 4.581