Literature DB >> 23982710

Safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in acute experimental ischemic stroke.

Luca Peruzzotti-Jametti1, Marco Cambiaghi, Marco Bacigaluppi, Mattia Gallizioli, Edoardo Gaude, Silvia Mari, Stefano Sandrone, Marco Cursi, Luis Teneud, Giancarlo Comi, Giovanna Musco, Gianvito Martino, Letizia Leocani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Transcranial direct current stimulation is emerging as a promising tool for the treatment of several neurological conditions, including cerebral ischemia. The therapeutic role of this noninvasive treatment is, however, limited to chronic phases of stroke. We thus ought to investigate whether different stimulation protocols could also be beneficial in the acute phase of experimental brain ischemia.
METHODS: The influence of both cathodal and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in modifying brain metabolism of healthy mice was first tested by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Then, mice undergoing transient proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion were randomized and treated acutely with anodal, cathodal, or sham transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain metabolism, functional outcomes, and ischemic lesion volume, as well as the inflammatory reaction and blood brain barrier functionality, were analyzed.
RESULTS: Cathodal stimulation was able, if applied in the acute phase of stroke, to preserve cortical neurons from the ischemic damage, to reduce inflammation, and to promote a better clinical recovery compared with sham and anodal treatments. This finding was attributable to the significant decrease of cortical glutamate, as indicated by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Conversely, anodal stimulation induced an increase in the postischemic lesion volume and augmented blood brain barrier derangement.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that transcranial direct current stimulation exerts a measurable neuroprotective effect in the acute phase of stroke. However, its timing and polarity should be carefully identified on the base of the pathophysiological context to avoid potential harmful side effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electric stimulation; mice; neuroprotective agents; stroke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23982710     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  36 in total

1.  Glial responses to implanted electrodes in the brain.

Authors:  Joseph W Salatino; Kip A Ludwig; Takashi D Y Kozai; Erin K Purcell
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 25.671

Review 2.  Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Authors:  A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Central Nervous System Electrical Stimulation for Neuroprotection in Acute Cerebral Ischemia: Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Studies.

Authors:  Mersedeh Bahr Hosseini; Jesse Hou; Marom Bikson; Marco Iacoboni; Jeffrey Gornbein; Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 4.  Resilience to Injury: A New Approach to Neuroprotection?

Authors:  Neel S Singhal; Chung-Huan Sun; Evan M Lee; Dengke K Ma
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.620

5.  Using dual polarities of transcranial direct current stimulation in global cerebral ischemia and its following reperfusion period attenuates neuronal injury.

Authors:  Rasoul Kaviannejad; Seyed Morteza Karimian; Esmail Riahi; Ghorbangol Ashabi
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.584

6.  Photothrombotic Mouse Models for the Study of Melatonin as a Therapeutic Tool After Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Marco Cambiaghi; Laura Cherchi; Stefano Comai
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 7.  Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Pnina Grossman; Chris Thomas; Adantchede Louis Zannou; Jimmy Jiang; Tatheer Adnan; Antonios P Mourdoukoutas; Greg Kronberg; Dennis Truong; Paulo Boggio; André R Brunoni; Leigh Charvet; Felipe Fregni; Brita Fritsch; Bernadette Gillick; Roy H Hamilton; Benjamin M Hampstead; Ryan Jankord; Adam Kirton; Helena Knotkova; David Liebetanz; Anli Liu; Colleen Loo; Michael A Nitsche; Janine Reis; Jessica D Richardson; Alexander Rotenberg; Peter E Turkeltaub; Adam J Woods
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Integrated treatment modality of cathodal-transcranial direct current stimulation with peripheral sensory stimulation affords neuroprotection in a rat stroke model.

Authors:  Yu-Hang Liu; Su Jing Chan; Han-Chi Pan; Aishwarya Bandla; Nicolas K K King; Peter Tsun Hon Wong; You-Yin Chen; Wai Hoe Ng; Nitish V Thakor; Lun-De Liao
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.593

Review 9.  The role of the immune system in central nervous system plasticity after acute injury.

Authors:  Luca Peruzzotti-Jametti; Matteo Donegá; Elena Giusto; Giulia Mallucci; Bianca Marchetti; Stefano Pluchino
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Using animal models to improve the design and application of transcranial electrical stimulation in humans.

Authors:  Carlos A Sánchez-León; Claudia Ammann; Javier F Medina; Javier Márquez-Ruiz
Journal:  Curr Behav Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.