Literature DB >> 23982648

The laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: the Italian experience: outcomes from 974 consecutive cases in a multicenter review.

M Musella1, A Susa, F Greco, M De Luca, E Manno, C Di Stefano, M Milone, R Bonfanti, G Segato, A Antonino, L Piazza.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to the failure of the "old Mason loop," the mini-gastric bypass (MGB) has been viewed with skepticism. During the past 12 years, a growing number of authors from around the world have continued to report excellent short- and long-term results with MGB.
METHODS: One university center, three regional hospitals, and two private hospitals participated in this study. From July 2006 to December 2012, 475 men (48.8 %) and 499 women (51.2 %) underwent 974 laparoscopic MGBs. The mean age of these patients was 39.4, and their preoperative body mass index was 48 ± 4.58 kg/m(2). Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) affected 224 (22.9 %) of the 974 patients, whereas 291 of the 974 patients (29.8 %) presented with hypertension. The preoperative gastrointestinal status was explored in all the patients through esophagogastroduodenoscopia. The major end points of the study were definitions of both MGB safety and efficacy in the long term as well as the endoscopic changes in symptomatic patients eventually produced by surgery.
RESULTS: The rate of conversion to open surgery was 1.2 % (12/974), and the mortality rate was 0.2 % (2/974). The perioperative morbidity rate was 5.5 % (54/974), with 20 (2 %) of the 974 patients requiring an early surgical revision. The mean hospital length of stay was 4.0 ± 1.7 days. At this writing, 818 patients are being followed up. Late complications have affected 74 (9 %) of the 818 patients. The majority of these complications (66/74, 89.1 %) have occurred within 1 year after surgery. Bile reflux gastritis was symptomatic, with endoscopic findings reported for 8 (0.9 %) and acid peptic ulcers for 14 (1.7 %) of the 818 patients. A late revision surgery was required for 7 (0.8 %) of the 818 patients. No patient required revision surgery due to biliary gastritis. At 60 months, the percentage of excess weight loss was 77 ± 5.1 %, the T2DM remission was 84.4 %, and the resolution of hypertension was 87.5 %.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite initial skepticism, this study, together with many other large-scale, long-term similar studies from around the world (e.g., Taiwan, United States, France, Spain, India, Lebanon) demonstrated the MGB to be a short, simple, low-risk, effective, and durable bariatric procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23982648     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3141-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  35 in total

1.  Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: short-term single-institute experience.

Authors:  Luigi Piazza; Francesco Ferrara; Silvana Leanza; Danilo Coco; Salvatore Sarvà; Angelo Bellia; Carla Di Stefano; Francesco Basile; Antonio Biondi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2011-11-22

2.  Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach. Position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

Authors:  S E Inzucchi; R M Bergenstal; J B Buse; M Diamant; E Ferrannini; M Nauck; A L Peters; A Tsapas; R Wender; D R Matthews
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 10.122

3.  One-anastomosis gastric bypass by laparoscopy: results of the first 209 patients.

Authors:  Miguel Carbajo; Manuel García-Caballero; Miguel Toledano; Diego Osorio; Cándido García-Lanza; José Antonio Carmona
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases.

Authors:  R Rutledge
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Continued excellent results with the mini-gastric bypass: six-year study in 2,410 patients.

Authors:  Robert Rutledge; Thomas R Walsh
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Mortality from gastric cancer following gastric surgery for peptic ulcer.

Authors:  C P Caygill; M J Hill; J S Kirkham; T C Northfield
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-04-26       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience.

Authors:  Wei-Jei Lee; Kong-Han Ser; Yi-Chih Lee; Jun-Juin Tsou; Shu-Chun Chen; Jung-Chien Chen
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Evaluation of endoscopy for early detection of gastric-stump cancer.

Authors:  G J Offerhaus; A C Tersmette; F M Giardiello; K Huibregtse; J P Vandenbroucke; G N Tytgat
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-07-04       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A prospective study on primary gastric stump cancer following partial gastrectomy for benign gastroduodenal diseases.

Authors:  S Tokudome; S Kono; M Ikeda; M Kuratsune; C Sano; K Inokuchi; Y Kodama; H Ichimiya; F Nakayama; N Kaibara
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Importance of routine preoperative upper GI endoscopy: why all patients should be evaluated?

Authors:  Rodrigo Muñoz; Luis Ibáñez; José Salinas; Alex Escalona; Gustavo Pérez; Fernando Pimentel; Sergio Guzmán; Camilo Boza
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 4.129

View more
  82 in total

1.  A 7-Year Clinical Audit of 1107 Cases Comparing Sleeve Gastrectomy, Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass, and Mini-Gastric Bypass, to Determine an Effective and Safe Bariatric and Metabolic Procedure.

Authors:  Gurvinder S Jammu; Rajni Sharma
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Letter to the Editor: Bariatric Surgery Worldwide 2013 Reveals a Rise in Mini Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Mervyn Deitel
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Laparoscopic Conversion of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Chronic Bile Reflux.

Authors:  Enrico Facchiano; Luca Leuratti; Marco Veltri; Marcello Lucchese
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Outcomes of Long Pouch Gastric Bypass (LPGB): 4-Year Experience in Primary and Revision Cases.

Authors:  Rui Ribeiro; Sjaak Pouwels; Chetan Parmar; João Pereira; Leonor Manaças; Anabela Guerra; Nuno Borges; João Ribeiro; Octávio Viveiros
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  An Analysis of Mid-Term Complications, Weight Loss, and Type 2 Diabetes Resolution of Stomach Intestinal Pylorus-Sparing Surgery (SIPS) Versus Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) with Three-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Austin Cottam; Daniel Cottam; Hinali Zaveri; Samuel Cottam; Amit Surve; Walter Medlin; Christina Richards
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 6.  IFSO Update Position Statement on One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB).

Authors:  Maurizio De Luca; Giacomo Piatto; Giovanni Merola; Jacques Himpens; Jean-Marc Chevallier; Miguel-A Carbajo; Kamal Mahawar; Alberto Sartori; Nicola Clemente; Miguel Herrera; Kelvin Higa; Wendy A Brown; Scott Shikora
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Gastrogastric Fistula: an Unusual Cause for Severe Bile Reflux Following Conversion of Sleeve Gastrectomy to One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Ashraf Haddad; Ahmad Bashir; Abdelrahman Nimeri
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Complications Following the Mini/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB/OAGB): a Multi-institutional Survey on 2678 Patients with a Mid-term (5 Years) Follow-up.

Authors:  Mario Musella; Antonio Susa; Emilio Manno; Maurizio De Luca; Francesco Greco; Marco Raffaelli; Stefano Cristiano; Marco Milone; Paolo Bianco; Antonio Vilardi; Ivana Damiano; Gianni Segato; Laura Pedretti; Piero Giustacchini; Domenico Fico; Gastone Veroux; Luigi Piazza
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Efficiency and risks of laparoscopic conversion of omega anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Roel Bolckmans; Gustavo Arman; Jacques Himpens
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  A Matched Cohort Analysis of Stomach Intestinal Pylorus Saving (SIPS) Surgery Versus Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch with Two-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Austin Cottam; Daniel Cottam; Dana Portenier; Hinali Zaveri; Amit Surve; Samuel Cottam; Legrand Belnap; Walter Medlin; Christina Richards
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.