Literature DB >> 23982622

Specialised use of working memory by Portia africana, a spider-eating salticid.

Fiona R Cross1, Robert R Jackson.   

Abstract

Using expectancy-violation methods, we investigated the role of working memory in the predatory strategy of Portia africana, a salticid spider from Kenya that preys by preference on other spiders. One of this predator's tactics is to launch opportunistic leaping attacks on to other spiders in their webs. Focussing on this particular tactic, our experiments began with a test spider on a ramp facing a lure (dead prey spider mounted on a cork disc) that could be reached by leaping. After the test spider faced the lure for 30 s, we blocked the test spider's view of the lure by lowering an opaque shutter before the spider leapt. When the shutter was raised 90 s later, either the same lure came into view again (control) or a different lure came into view (experimental: different prey type in same orientation or same prey type in different orientation). We recorded attack frequency (number of test spiders that leapt at the lure) and attack latency (time elapsing between shutter being raised and spiders initiating a leap). Attack latencies in control trials were not significantly different from attack latencies in experimental trials, regardless of whether it was prey type or prey orientation that changed in the experimental trials. However, compared with test spiders in the no-change control trials, significantly fewer test spiders leapt when prey type changed. There was no significant effect on attack frequency when prey orientation changed. These findings suggest that this predator represents prey type independently of prey orientation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23982622      PMCID: PMC3946049          DOI: 10.1007/s10071-013-0675-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  21 in total

1.  Mental imagery: against the nihilistic hypothesis.

Authors:  Stephen M. Kosslyn; Giorgio Ganis; William L. Thompson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The value of the Piagetian framework for comparative cognitive studies.

Authors:  Irene M Pepperberg
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  In defense of representation.

Authors:  A B Markman; E Dietrich
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Representations in animal cognition: an introduction.

Authors:  C R Gallistel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1990-11

5.  Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  R N Shepard; J Metzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  The brain's visual world: representation of visual targets in cerebral cortex.

Authors:  J H Maunsell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-11-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies.

Authors:  Alan Baddeley
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  Numerical representations in primates.

Authors:  M D Hauser; P MacNeilage; M Ware
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  The comparative study of mental time travel.

Authors:  William A Roberts; Miranda C Feeney
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Orientation invariant pattern recognition by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  J D Delius; V D Hollard
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.231

View more
  6 in total

1.  Representation of different exact numbers of prey by a spider-eating predator.

Authors:  Fiona R Cross; Robert R Jackson
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Ontogenetic shift in plant-related cognitive specialization by a mosquito-eating predator.

Authors:  Georgina E Carvell; Robert R Jackson; Fiona R Cross
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  The execution of planned detours by spider-eating predators.

Authors:  Fiona R Cross; Robert R Jackson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 4.  Congratulations to Animal Cognition on its 50th birthday! Some thoughts on the last 50 years of animal cognition research.

Authors:  Michael J Beran
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.899

Review 5.  Extended spider cognition.

Authors:  Hilton F Japyassú; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 6.  Quantitative abilities of invertebrates: a methodological review.

Authors:  Elia Gatto; Olli J Loukola; Christian Agrillo
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.084

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.