OBJECTIVE:Ketamine, a glutamate N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, has shown rapid antidepressant effects, but small study groups and inadequate control conditions in prior studies have precluded a definitive conclusion. The authors evaluated the rapid antidepressant efficacy of ketamine in a large group of patients with treatment-resistant major depression. METHOD: This was a two-site, parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial of a single infusion of ketamine compared to an active placebo control condition, the anesthetic midazolam. Patients with treatment-resistant major depression experiencing a major depressive episode were randomly assigned under double-blind conditions to receive a single intravenous infusion of ketamine or midazolam in a 2:1 ratio (N=73). The primary outcome was change in depression severity 24 hours after drug administration, as assessed by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). RESULTS: The ketamine group had greater improvement in the MADRS score than the midazolam group 24 hours after treatment. After adjustment for baseline scores and site, the MADRS score was lower in the ketamine group than in the midazolam group by 7.95 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.20 to 12.71). The likelihood of response at 24 hours was greater with ketamine than with midazolam (odds ratio, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.21 to 4.14), with response rates of 64% and 28%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Ketamine demonstrated rapid antidepressant effects in an optimized study design, further supporting NMDA receptor modulation as a novel mechanism for accelerated improvement in severe and chronic forms of depression. More information on response durability and safety is required before implementation in clinical practice.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE:Ketamine, a glutamate N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, has shown rapid antidepressant effects, but small study groups and inadequate control conditions in prior studies have precluded a definitive conclusion. The authors evaluated the rapid antidepressant efficacy of ketamine in a large group of patients with treatment-resistant major depression. METHOD: This was a two-site, parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial of a single infusion of ketamine compared to an active placebo control condition, the anesthetic midazolam. Patients with treatment-resistant major depression experiencing a major depressive episode were randomly assigned under double-blind conditions to receive a single intravenous infusion of ketamine or midazolam in a 2:1 ratio (N=73). The primary outcome was change in depression severity 24 hours after drug administration, as assessed by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). RESULTS: The ketamine group had greater improvement in the MADRS score than the midazolam group 24 hours after treatment. After adjustment for baseline scores and site, the MADRS score was lower in the ketamine group than in the midazolam group by 7.95 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.20 to 12.71). The likelihood of response at 24 hours was greater with ketamine than with midazolam (odds ratio, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.21 to 4.14), with response rates of 64% and 28%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Ketamine demonstrated rapid antidepressant effects in an optimized study design, further supporting NMDA receptor modulation as a novel mechanism for accelerated improvement in severe and chronic forms of depression. More information on response durability and safety is required before implementation in clinical practice.
Authors: Pamela Y Collins; Vikram Patel; Sarah S Joestl; Dana March; Thomas R Insel; Abdallah S Daar; Warwick Anderson; Muhammad A Dhansay; Anthony Phillips; Susan Shurin; Mark Walport; Wendy Ewart; Sir John Savill; Isabel A Bordin; E Jane Costello; Maureen Durkin; Christopher Fairburn; Roger I Glass; Wayne Hall; Yueqin Huang; Steven E Hyman; Kay Jamison; Sylvia Kaaya; Shitij Kapur; Arthur Kleinman; Adesola Ogunniyi; Angel Otero-Ojeda; Mu-Ming Poo; Vijayalakshmi Ravindranath; Barbara J Sahakian; Shekhar Saxena; Peter A Singer; Dan J Stein Journal: Nature Date: 2011-07-06 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Husseini K Manji; Jorge A Quiroz; Jonathan Sporn; Jennifer L Payne; Kirk Denicoff; Neil A Gray; Carlos A Zarate; Dennis S Charney Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2003-04-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: James W Murrough; Andrew M Perez; Sarah Pillemer; Jessica Stern; Michael K Parides; Marije aan het Rot; Katherine A Collins; Sanjay J Mathew; Dennis S Charney; Dan V Iosifescu Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-07-27 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Marije aan het Rot; Katherine A Collins; James W Murrough; Andrew M Perez; David L Reich; Dennis S Charney; Sanjay J Mathew Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: A John Rush; Maurizio Fava; Stephen R Wisniewski; Philip W Lavori; Madhukar H Trivedi; Harold A Sackeim; Michael E Thase; Andrew A Nierenberg; Frederic M Quitkin; T Michael Kashner; David J Kupfer; Jerrold F Rosenbaum; Jonathan Alpert; Jonathan W Stewart; Patrick J McGrath; Melanie M Biggs; Kathy Shores-Wilson; Barry D Lebowitz; Louise Ritz; George Niederehe Journal: Control Clin Trials Date: 2004-02
Authors: A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi; Stephen R Wisniewski; Jonathan W Stewart; Andrew A Nierenberg; Michael E Thase; Louise Ritz; Melanie M Biggs; Diane Warden; James F Luther; Kathy Shores-Wilson; George Niederehe; Maurizio Fava Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-03-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Anita E Autry; Megumi Adachi; Elena Nosyreva; Elisa S Na; Maarten F Los; Peng-fei Cheng; Ege T Kavalali; Lisa M Monteggia Journal: Nature Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Christine DeLorenzo; Nicole DellaGioia; Michael Bloch; Gerard Sanacora; Nabeel Nabulsi; Chadi Abdallah; Jie Yang; Ruofeng Wen; J John Mann; John H Krystal; Ramin V Parsey; Richard E Carson; Irina Esterlis Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: P Molero; J A Ramos-Quiroga; R Martin-Santos; E Calvo-Sánchez; L Gutiérrez-Rojas; J J Meana Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 5.749