Literature DB >> 23981982

Attributes and barriers to care of pelvic pain in university women.

Julie Mann1, Jonathan Shuster, Nash Moawad.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To describe rates of pelvic pain in university women ages 18 and older and to explore the barriers to adequate health care for pelvic pain in this population.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
SETTING: University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. PATIENTS: A total of 2000 female students at the University of Florida were randomly selected for participation.
INTERVENTIONS: The 2000 sample members were sent a questionnaire to be completed online.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The online questionnaire was hosted through the REDCap electronic data capture tool hosted at the University of Florida. This questionnaire included demographic items, general health and health behavior questions, measures to assess different types of pelvic pain (e.g., dysmenorrheal; dyspareunia; urinary, bowel, and vulvar pain), items regarding barriers to care for pelvic pain problems, and quality of life measures. Data were exported to SAS software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) for analysis. Of the 2000 subjects who received the questionnaire invitation, 390 filled out the questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 19.5%. Respondents' ages ranged from 18 to 62 with a mean of 23 years. A total of 72.8% of respondents reported experiencing pelvic pain over the past 12 months. Dysmenorrhea was reported by nearly 80% of participants, over one third of participants noted deep dyspareunia, and a significant proportion of participants reported symptoms related to bowel movements. Vulvar symptoms, including superficial dyspareunia, were reported by 21.5% of participants. Most participants with pelvic pain (78.8%) have not received any diagnosis for their pain, whereas 73.6% reported not yet having visited a doctor. Significant barriers to receiving adequate medical care were reported, including difficulty with insurance coverage and physicians' lack of time and knowledge or interest in chronic pelvic pain conditions.
CONCLUSION: Pelvic pain in younger women is a critical public health issue experienced by a significant portion of the population. Significant awareness deficits and barriers to care exist. Careful study of the barriers to receiving adequate medical care reported by these women will allow researchers to describe how best to improve care for these syndromes.
Copyright © 2013 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barriers to care; Dyspareunia; Gynecology; Pelvic pain; University women

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23981982      PMCID: PMC4241758          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  32 in total

1.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Prevalence and incidence of chronic pelvic pain in primary care: evidence from a national general practice database.

Authors:  K T Zondervan; P L Yudkin; M P Vessey; M G Dawes; D H Barlow; S H Kennedy
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1999-11

Review 3.  Peritoneal adhesions: etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical significance. Recent advances in prevention and management.

Authors:  T Liakakos; N Thomakos; P M Fine; C Dervenis; R L Young
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.588

4.  Vulvar pain, sexual behavior and genital infections in a young population: a pilot study.

Authors:  Anna-Lena Berglund; Linda Nigaard; Eva Rylander
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Prevalence and correlates of three types of pelvic pain in a nationally representative sample of Australian women.

Authors:  Marian K Pitts; Jason A Ferris; Anthony M A Smith; Julia M Shelley; Juliet Richters
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 6.  Menstrual-related pain conditions: dysmenorrhea and migraine.

Authors:  Lisa K Mannix
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Diagnostic experience among 4,334 women reporting surgically diagnosed endometriosis.

Authors:  Rebecca Greene; Pamela Stratton; Sean D Cleary; Mary Lou Ballweg; Ninet Sinaii
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 8.  Chronic pelvic pain in women: etiology, pathogenesis and diagnostic approach.

Authors:  Paolo Vercellini; Edgardo Somigliana; Paola Viganò; Annalisa Abbiati; Giussy Barbara; Luigi Fedele
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 9.  Chronic pelvic pain.

Authors:  Fred M Howard
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Psychological and colonic factors in painful diverticulosis.

Authors:  D J Humes; J Simpson; K R Neal; J H Scholefield; R C Spiller
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Urogenital and pelvic complications in the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes and associated hypermobility spectrum disorders: A scoping review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gilliam; Jodi D Hoffman; Gloria Yeh
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.438

2.  The Relationship of Older Adults' Physical Pain to Depression and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): A Review.

Authors:  Golnar Alamdari; Luciana Laganà
Journal:  J Geriatr Med Gerontol       Date:  2015-12-31

3.  Neuromodulation for Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Single-Institution Experience With a Collaborative Team.

Authors:  Cheyanne Bridger; Tarun Prabhala; Rachael Dawson; Olga Khazen; Jacquelyn MacDonell; Marisa DiMarzio; Michael D Staudt; Elise J B De; Charles Argoff; Julie G Pilitsis
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.654

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.