Literature DB >> 23981781

In vivo demonstration of cancer molecular imaging with ultrasound radiation force and buried-ligand microbubbles.

Mark A Borden1, Jason E Streeter, Shashank R Sirsi, Paul A Dayton.   

Abstract

In designing targeted contrast agent materials for imaging, the need to present a targeting ligand for recognition and binding by the target is counterbalanced by the need to minimize interactions with plasma components and to avoid recognition by the immune system. We have previously reported on a microbubble imaging probe for ultrasound molecular imaging that uses a buried-ligand surface architecture to minimize unwanted interactions and immunogenicity. Here we examine for the first time the utility of this approach for in vivo molecular imaging. In accordance with previous results, we showed a threefold increase in circulation persistence through the tumor of a fibrosarcoma model in comparison with controls. The buried-ligand microbubbles were then activated for targeted adhesion through the application of noninvasive ultrasound radiation forces applied specifically to the tumor region. Using a clinical ultrasound scanner, microbubbles were activated, imaged, and silenced. The results showed visually conspicuous images of tumor neovasculature and a twofold increase in ultrasound radiation force enhancement of acoustic contrast intensity for buried-ligand microbubbles, whereas no such increase was found for exposed-ligand microbubbles. We therefore conclude that the use of acoustically active buried-ligand microbubbles for ultrasound molecular imaging bridges the demand for low immunogenicity with the necessity of maintaining targeting efficacy and imaging conspicuity in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23981781      PMCID: PMC4494687     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1535-3508            Impact factor:   4.488


  25 in total

1.  The magnitude of radiation force on ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Paul A Dayton; John S Allen; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effect of surface architecture on in vivo ultrasound contrast persistence of targeted size-selected microbubbles.

Authors:  Cherry C Chen; Shashank R Sirsi; Shunichi Homma; Mark A Borden
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Microbubble size isolation by differential centrifugation.

Authors:  Jameel A Feshitan; Cherry C Chen; James J Kwan; Mark A Borden
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 8.128

4.  Structures of complement component C3 provide insights into the function and evolution of immunity.

Authors:  Bert J C Janssen; Eric G Huizinga; Hans C A Raaijmakers; Anja Roos; Mohamed R Daha; Kristina Nilsson-Ekdahl; Bo Nilsson; Piet Gros
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The role of poly(ethylene glycol) brush architecture in complement activation on targeted microbubble surfaces.

Authors:  Cherry C Chen; Mark A Borden
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Characteristics of SonoVuetrade mark.

Authors:  Michel Schneider
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.724

Review 7.  Imaging in the era of molecular oncology.

Authors:  Ralph Weissleder; Mikael J Pittet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Imaging of angiogenesis using Cadence contrast pulse sequencing and targeted contrast agents.

Authors:  Susanne M Stieger; Paul A Dayton; Mark A Borden; Charles F Caskey; Stephen M Griffey; Erik R Wisner; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Long residence time of ultrasound microbubbles targeted to integrin in murine tumor model.

Authors:  Hong Young Jun; Seong Hoon Park; Hun Soo Kim; Kwon-Ha Yoon
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Integrin alphaVbeta3 Binds to the RGD motif of glycoprotein B of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus and functions as an RGD-dependent entry receptor.

Authors:  H Jacques Garrigues; Yelena E Rubinchikova; C Michael Dipersio; Timothy M Rose
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.103

View more
  10 in total

1.  Two-bubble acoustic tweezing cytometry for biomechanical probing and stimulation of cells.

Authors:  Di Chen; Yubing Sun; Madhu S R Gudur; Yi-Sing Hsiao; Ziqi Wu; Jianping Fu; Cheri X Deng
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Microbubble Radiation Force-Induced Translation in Plane-Wave Versus Focused Transmission Modes.

Authors:  Francesco Guidi; Outi Supponen; Awaneesh Upadhyay; Hendrik J Vos; Mark Andrew Borden; Piero Tortoli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 3.  Targeting of microbubbles: contrast agents for ultrasound molecular imaging.

Authors:  Shiying Wang; John A Hossack; Alexander L Klibanov
Journal:  J Drug Target       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.121

Review 4.  State-of-the-art materials for ultrasound-triggered drug delivery.

Authors:  Shashank R Sirsi; Mark A Borden
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 15.470

5.  In vivo thrombolysis with targeted microbubbles loading tissue plasminogen activator in a rabbit femoral artery thrombus model.

Authors:  Xing Hua; Lina Zhou; Ping Liu; Yun He; Kaibin Tan; Qinghai Chen; Yuejuan Gao; Yunhua Gao
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Optical Verification of Microbubble Response to Acoustic Radiation Force in Large Vessels With In Vivo Results.

Authors:  Shiying Wang; Claudia Y Wang; Sunil Unnikrishnan; Alexander L Klibanov; John A Hossack; F William Mauldin
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 7.  Production of acoustic radiation force using ultrasound: methods and applications.

Authors:  Matthew W Urban
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.166

8.  A Targeting Microbubble for Ultrasound Molecular Imaging.

Authors:  James Shue-Min Yeh; Charles A Sennoga; Ellen McConnell; Robert Eckersley; Meng-Xing Tang; Sussan Nourshargh; John M Seddon; Dorian O Haskard; Petros Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Nanosized Contrast Agents in Ultrasound Molecular Imaging.

Authors:  Fengyi Zeng; Meng Du; Zhiyi Chen
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-11-29

10.  Construction of ultrasonic nanobubbles carrying CAIX polypeptides to target carcinoma cells derived from various organs.

Authors:  Lianhua Zhu; Yanli Guo; Luofu Wang; Xiaozhou Fan; Xingyu Xiong; Kejing Fang; Dan Xu
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 10.435

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.