Literature DB >> 23979815

Psychometric assessment of the Persian version of the Ferrans and Powers 3.0 index in hemodialysis patients.

Tania Dehesh1, Najaf Zare, Peyman Jafari, Mohammad Mehdi Sagheb.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Ferrans and Powers 3.0 quality of life index (dialysis type) in patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) in order to describe their health-related quality of life (HRQOL).
METHODS: The sample (n = 150) consisted of adult HD patients receiving HD for at least 6 months from the establishment of the study. A total of 88 men and 62 women, with an average age of 50.47, from Shiraz, southern Iran, were enrolled in this study. The questionnaire was translated into Persian language using back translation and bilingual techniques. Convergent, discriminant, and construct validity of the Ferrans and Powers 3.0 dialysis version was evaluated. To check the internal consistency of the data, Cronbach's alpha, which indicates the reliability of the data, was used for the entire questionnaire and for the subscales.
RESULTS: The convergent and discriminant validity and success scaling rate for both sexes were 100 %. Cronbach's alpha was 0.95 overall, which was greater than 0.7 for all the subscales except for the family subscale. Our results suggest that HD patients in southern Iran have higher HRQOL scores when compared with those in other countries. Despite the higher mean HRQOL score for men compared with women, men had significantly higher HRQOL scores only in the health and functioning subscale. There was no significant correlation between HD patients' HRQOL and educational level.
CONCLUSION: The Persian version of Ferrans and Powers 3.0 has sufficient reliability and validity for measuring the quality of life of Persian-speaking HD patients. Female HD patients need more support and attention from family and society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23979815     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-013-0537-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  27 in total

1.  Changes in quality of life over time--Dutch haemodialysis patients and general population compared.

Authors:  Albert H A Mazairac; G Ardine de Wit; E Lars Penne; Neelke C van der Weerd; Boudewijn de Jong; Muriel P C Grooteman; Marinus A van den Dorpel; Erik Buskens; Friedo W Dekker; Menso J Nubé; Piet M Ter Wee; Els W Boeschoten; Michiel L Bots; Peter J Blankestijn
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 5.992

2.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; Sandra D M Bot; Michael R de Boer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Dirk L Knol; Joost Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Factors affecting quality of life in persons on hemodialysis.

Authors:  Daria L Kring; Patricia B Crane
Journal:  Nephrol Nurs J       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.959

4.  Psychometric assessment of the Quality of Life Index.

Authors:  C E Ferrans; M J Powers
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 5.  Assessing health and quality of life outcomes in dialysis: a report on an Institute of Medicine workshop.

Authors:  R A Rettig; J H Sadler; K B Meyer; J H Wasson; G R Parkerson; B Kantz; R D Hays; D L Patrick
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 8.860

6.  Self-assessed physical and mental function of haemodialysis patients.

Authors:  S K Mittal; L Ahern; E Flaster; J K Maesaka; S Fishbane
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.992

7.  Self-care self-efficacy, depression, and quality of life among patients receiving hemodialysis in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shiow-Luan Tsay; Marilyn Healstead
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.837

8.  Satisfaction with health care of hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  C E Ferrans; M J Powers; C R Kasch
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.228

9.  Psychosocial factors, behavioral compliance and survival in urban hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  P L Kimmel; R A Peterson; K L Weihs; S J Simmens; S Alleyne; I Cruz; J H Veis
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  Health related quality of life of Iranian children with type 1 diabetes: reliability and validity of the Persian version of the PedsQL™ Generic Core Scales and Diabetes Module.

Authors:  Peyman Jafari; Elham Forouzandeh; Zahra Bagheri; Zohreh Karamizadeh; Keivan Shalileh
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  2 in total

1.  Testing measurement equivalence of the SF-36 questionnaire across patients on hemodialysis and healthy people.

Authors:  Zahra Bagheri; Peyman Jafari; Marjan Faghih; Elahe Allahyari; Tania Dehesh
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in adult patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review.

Authors:  Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi; Derek Kyte; Paul Cockwell; Tom Marshall; Adrian Gheorghe; Thomas Keeley; Anita Slade; Melanie Calvert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.