UNLABELLED: We report on a radiopharmaceutical imaging platform designed to capture the kinetics of cellular responses to drugs. METHODS: A portable in vitro molecular imaging system comprising a microchip and a β-particle imaging camera permitted routine cell-based radioassays of small numbers of either suspended or adherent cells. We investigated the kinetics of responses of model lymphoma and glioblastoma cancer cell lines to (18)F-FDG uptake after drug exposure. Those responses were correlated with kinetic changes in the cell cycle or with changes in receptor tyrosine kinase signaling. RESULTS: The platform enabled direct radioassays of multiple cell types and yielded results comparable to those from conventional approaches; however, the platform used smaller sample sizes, permitted a higher level of quantitation, and did not require cell lysis. CONCLUSION: The kinetic analysis enabled by the platform provided a rapid (≈ 1 h) drug screening assay.
UNLABELLED: We report on a radiopharmaceutical imaging platform designed to capture the kinetics of cellular responses to drugs. METHODS: A portable in vitro molecular imaging system comprising a microchip and a β-particle imaging camera permitted routine cell-based radioassays of small numbers of either suspended or adherent cells. We investigated the kinetics of responses of model lymphoma and glioblastoma cancer cell lines to (18)F-FDG uptake after drug exposure. Those responses were correlated with kinetic changes in the cell cycle or with changes in receptor tyrosine kinase signaling. RESULTS: The platform enabled direct radioassays of multiple cell types and yielded results comparable to those from conventional approaches; however, the platform used smaller sample sizes, permitted a higher level of quantitation, and did not require cell lysis. CONCLUSION: The kinetic analysis enabled by the platform provided a rapid (≈ 1 h) drug screening assay.
Authors: Ingo K Mellinghoff; Maria Y Wang; Igor Vivanco; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Shaojun Zhu; Ederlyn Q Dia; Kan V Lu; Koji Yoshimoto; Julie H Y Huang; Dennis J Chute; Bridget L Riggs; Steve Horvath; Linda M Liau; Webster K Cavenee; P Nagesh Rao; Rameen Beroukhim; Timothy C Peck; Jeffrey C Lee; William R Sellers; David Stokoe; Michael Prados; Timothy F Cloughesy; Charles L Sawyers; Paul S Mischel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-11-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paul H Huang; Akitake Mukasa; Rudy Bonavia; Ryan A Flynn; Zachary E Brewer; Webster K Cavenee; Frank B Furnari; Forest M White Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-07-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Rachel E Laing; Martin A Walter; Dean O Campbell; Harvey R Herschman; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Michael E Phelps; Johannes Czernin; Owen N Witte; Caius G Radu Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-02-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Caius G Radu; Chengyi J Shu; Evan Nair-Gill; Stephanie M Shelly; Jorge R Barrio; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Michael E Phelps; Owen N Witte Journal: Nat Med Date: 2008-06-08 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Silvan Türkcan; Julia Nguyen; Marta Vilalta; Bin Shen; Frederick T Chin; Guillem Pratx; Paul Abbyad Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2015-06-15 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Young Shik Shin; Jungwoo Kim; Dazy Johnson; Alex A Dooraghi; Wilson X Mai; Lisa Ta; Arion F Chatziioannou; Michael E Phelps; David A Nathanson; James R Heath Journal: Technology (Singap World Sci) Date: 2015-06-25
Authors: Wei Wei; Young Shik Shin; Min Xue; Tomoo Matsutani; Kenta Masui; Huijun Yang; Shiro Ikegami; Yuchao Gu; Ken Herrmann; Dazy Johnson; Xiangming Ding; Kiwook Hwang; Jungwoo Kim; Jian Zhou; Yapeng Su; Xinmin Li; Bruno Bonetti; Rajesh Chopra; C David James; Webster K Cavenee; Timothy F Cloughesy; Paul S Mischel; James R Heath; Beatrice Gini Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2016-04-11 Impact factor: 31.743