| Literature DB >> 23977287 |
Antar Puneet Virk1, Minakshi Puri, Vijaya Gupta, Neena Capalash, Prince Sharma.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The development in the deinking process has made recycled fiber a major part of the raw material for pulp and paper industry. Enzymes have revolutionized the deinking process obtaining brightness levels surpassing conventional deinking processes. This study explores the deinking efficiencies of bacterial alkalophilic laccase (L) and xylanase (X) enzymes along with physical deinking methods of microwaving (MW) and sonication (S) for recycling of old newsprint (ONP). METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23977287 PMCID: PMC3744503 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072346
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Effect of mediators (ABTS - 2,2′-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid, HBT - 1-hydroxybenzotriazole, Syr - syringaldehyde) and inhibitor (SA – sodium azide) on the deinking of ONP pulp with laccase enzyme.
Physical and Chemical characterization of enzymatically and physically deinked pulp.
| Parameters | PC | PXC | PLC | PXLC | PSXLC | PMWXLC | PSMWXLC |
|
| 10±0.9 | 9±0.78 | 8.8±0.74 | 8.1±0.83 | 7.8±0.75 | 7.7±0.75 | 7.4±0.66 |
|
| 49.0±0.5 | 53.5±0.4 | 54.9±0.5 | 59.6±0.8 | 61.45±0.4 | 61.73±0.4 | 63.12±0.5 |
|
| 1.31±0.6 | 9.75±0.8 | 10.3±0.8 | 22.7±0.5 | 23.85±0.6 | 24.09±0.9 | 25.47±0.8 |
|
| 535.41±16 | 278.55±23 | 202.24±33 | 183.07±24 | 145.20±30 | 148.51±16 | 139.46±22 |
|
| 1285±29 | 1182±25 | 1378±22 | 1498±25 | 1328±32 | 1331±30 | 1345±33 |
|
| 6.12±0.8 | 6.34±0.56 | 6.27±0.62 | 6.38±0.58 | 6.24±0.9 | 6.26±0.7 | 6.3±0.5 |
|
| 37.2±0.20 | 35.5±0.23 | 38.5±0.20 | 39.8±0.26 | 34.5±0.25 | 35.1±0.20 | 37.8±0.20 |
|
| 7.5±0.8 | 7.8±0.9 | 8.0±0.6 | 8.5±0.9 | 7.9±0.7 | 8.0±0.8 | 8.65±0.9 |
Figure 2Analysis of phenolic compounds, hydrophobic compounds and reducing sugars in effluent released after xylanase (X) and laccase (L) treatment.
Deinking of waste paper pulps by P-X-L-C treatment and reduction in chemical load.
| Waste paper pulp | Brightness (%ISO) | |||||||
| P-C | P-X-L-C | |||||||
| Chemicals used | 100% | 100% | 90% | 80% | 70% | 60% | 50% | 40% |
|
| 49±0.5 | 59.6±0.8 | 58.9±0.9 | 56.5±0.5 | 54.7±0.8 | 52.5±0.73 | 49.2±0.65 | 48.3±0.75 |
|
| 81.5±0.4 | 84.1±0.5 | 82.8±0.8 | 82.3±0.3 | 81.5±0.7 | 79.2±0.6 | – | – |
|
| 51±0.5 | 55.24±0.7 | 52.5±0.9 | 52.2±0.5 | 50.9±0.5 | 48.9±0.4 | – | – |
|
| 85.6±0.4 | 87.3±0.5 | 86.8±0.4 | 86.1±0.8 | 85.7±0.7 | 84.1±0.4 | – | – |
|
| 82±0.9 | 85.84±0.5 | 83.8±0.6 | 82.2±0.5 | 80.8±0.4 | – | – | – |
Figure 3X-ray diffraction analysis of control (P-U-C) and test (P-X-L-C treated) ONP pulp.
The crystallinity index and apparent crystal size (ACS) of untreated (P-C) and treated (P-X-L-C) ONP pulp cellulose.
| Parameters | P-C | P-X-L-C |
| Empirical crystalline index | 29.16 | 65.47 |
| Apparent crystal size (nm) | 0.78 | 1.35 |
| Cellulose crystallinity index (CI) | 1.16 | 1.28 |
Figure 4FTIR spectra of (1) P-C (2) P-X-L-C treated ONP pulp.
Signals assignment of hand sheets in FTIR spectra and their relative intensity for untreated (P-C) and treated (P-X-L-C) pulp.
| Bands cm−1 | Assignment | Relative intensity | |
| P-C | P-X-L-C | ||
|
| –OH stretching of hydrogen-bonding | 1.28 | 1.36 |
|
| CH asymmetrical stretching vibration in CH3, CH2, CH | 1.06 | 0.95 |
|
| C = O stretching vibration in β-C = O, COOH, ester | – | 0.94 |
|
| Aromatic skeletal vibrations plus C = O stretching | 1.07 | 0.98 |
|
| Aromatic skeletal vibrations | 1 | 1 |
|
| Aromatic skeletal vibrations combined with –OCH3 in plane deformations | 1.111 | 1.105 |
|
| Aliphatic C–H stretching in CH3 and phen-OH | 1.10 | 1.08 |
|
| C-O stretching vibration in guaiacyl ring | 1.13 | 1.11 |
|
| C-H stretching vibration in syringyl ring | – | 1.08 |
|
| C-O bending vibration in primary alcohol, ether | 1.38 | 1.47 |
|
| CH asymmetrical stretching vibration in CH3, CH2, CH | 0.97 | 0.95 |
Relative intensity was calculated as the ratio of absorbance of the band to the absorbance of band at 1510 cm−1.
Bands at 1737 and 1162 cm−1 appear only after enzymatic treatment.
Figure 5Scanning electron micrographs of (A) P-C and (B) P-X-L-C treated ONP pulp.
Optimization of parameters for sonication (S) and microwave (MW) treatment of ONP pulp.
| SONICATION (S) | MICROWAVING (MW) | ||||
| Brightness (%ISO) | Brightness (%ISO) | ||||
| Time (min) | P-S-C | P-S-X-L-C | Time (sec) | P-MW-C | P-MW-X-L-C |
|
| 49±0.45 | 58.65±0.40 |
| 49±0.9 | 58.8±0.5 |
|
| 50±0.58 | 59.5±0.40 |
| 50.1±0.8 | 59.75±0.9 |
|
| 51.2±0.8 | 60.35±0.8 |
| 52.8±0.41 |
|
|
| 52.1±0.6 |
|
| 49.2±0.4 | 57.1±0.44 |
|
| 52±0.44 | 61.15±0.39 |
| 49.12±0.30 | 53.1±0.39 |