Literature DB >> 23975126

Benefits of auditory training for aided listening by older adults.

Judy R Dubno.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this article, the authors provide an overview of auditory training programs for aided listening by older adults, review criteria for evaluating effectiveness, summarize results of published studies, report on 2 training programs currently undergoing assessment, and discuss directions and needs for future research.
METHOD: Experiments are ongoing to evaluate 2 individual, computer-based speech-perception training programs: Indiana University (IU) word-based training and the Speech Perception Assessment and Training System (SPATS). Training and control subjects are older adults with mild-to-severe hearing loss. Subjects train for about 30 hr with monaurally presented, spectrally shaped stimuli (IU) or through loudspeakers with their own hearing aids (SPATS). Displays and feedback use auditory and visual/orthographic cues. Outcome measures include objective measures of speech recognition in noise and other training benefits.
RESULTS: Significant improvements were observed in open-set recognition of trained sounds, words, phrases, and sentences. Large individual differences in training benefit were apparent. Generalization varied with the speech-perception task, competing noise, listening strategy, and pretraining scores.
CONCLUSIONS: High-level evidence is needed to support the effectiveness of auditory training for older adults as a supplement to aided listening. Studies are needed to predict who will benefit from specific types of training, to assess compliance and engagement, and to discover benefits beyond communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23975126      PMCID: PMC4051705          DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2013/12-0080)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Audiol        ISSN: 1059-0889            Impact factor:   1.493


  19 in total

1.  Sentence recognition materials based on frequency of word use and lexical confusability.

Authors:  T S Bell; R H Wilson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Development of a speech-in-multitalker-babble paradigm to assess word-recognition performance.

Authors:  Richard H Wilson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Mead C Killion; Patricia A Niquette; Gail I Gudmundsen; Lawrence J Revit; Shilpi Banerjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of long-term training on aided speech-recognition performance in noise in older adults.

Authors:  Matthew H Burk; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Adapting to changed hearing: the potential role of formal training.

Authors:  Arthur Boothroyd
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 6.  Speech comprehension training and auditory and cognitive processing in older adults.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Harry Levitt
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  The Connected Speech Test version 3: audiovisual administration.

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander; C Gilmore; K M Pusakulich
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST).

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander; C Gilmore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Perceptual training improves syllable identification in new and experienced hearing aid users.

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker; Glen A Bowman; E William Yund; Timothy J Herron; Christina M Roup; David L Woods
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug

10.  Auditory training alters the physiological detection of stimulus-specific cues in humans.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Antoine J Shahin; Terence Picton; Bernhard Ross
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  8 in total

1.  Listening and Learning: Cognitive Contributions to the Rehabilitation of Older Adults With and Without Audiometrically Defined Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Kristina C Backer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Task- and Talker-Specific Gains in Auditory Training.

Authors:  Joe Barcroft; Brent Spehar; Nancy Tye-Murray; Mitchell Sommers
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  How Does Auditory Training Work? Joined-Up Thinking and Listening.

Authors:  Melanie Ferguson; Helen Henshaw
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

4.  Evaluation of Speech-Perception Training for Hearing Aid Users: A Multisite Study in Progress.

Authors:  James D Miller; Charles S Watson; Judy R Dubno; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

5.  Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 5.750

6.  Speech perception in older hearing impaired listeners: benefits of perceptual training.

Authors:  David L Woods; Zoe Doss; Timothy J Herron; Tanya Arbogast; Masood Younus; Marc Ettlinger; E William Yund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Is a hybrid of online and face-to-face services feasible for audiological rehabilitation post COVID-19? Findings from three public health patients.

Authors:  Nuha Khatib; Vera-Genevey Hlayisi
Journal:  S Afr J Commun Disord       Date:  2022-08-17

8.  Teaching Children With Hearing Loss to Recognize Speech: Gains Made With Computer-Based Auditory and/or Speechreading Training.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Brent Spehar; Mitchell Sommers; Elizabeth Mauzé; Joe Barcroft; Heather Grantham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.