Hassan Serrier1, Hélène Sultan-Taieb, Danièle Luce, Sophie Bejean. 1. Laboratoire d'Économie et Gestion, Pôle Économie Gestion, Université de Bourgogne, 2 boulevard Gabriel, BP 26611, 21066, Dijon Cedex, France, hassan.serrier@u-bourgogne.fr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The objective of this article was to estimate the social cost of respiratory cancer cases attributable to occupational risk factors in France in 2010. METHODS: According to the attributable fraction method and based on available epidemiological data from the literature, we estimated the number of respiratory cancer cases due to each identified risk factor. We used the cost-of-illness method with a prevalence-based approach. We took into account the direct and indirect costs. We estimated the cost of production losses due to morbidity (absenteeism and presenteeism) and mortality costs (years of production losses) in the market and nonmarket spheres. RESULTS: The social cost of lung, larynx, sinonasal and mesothelioma cancer caused by exposure to asbestos, chromium, diesel engine exhaust, paint, crystalline silica, wood and leather dust in France in 2010 were estimated at between 917 and 2,181 million euros. Between 795 and 2,011 million euros (87-92%) of total costs were due to lung cancer alone. Asbestos was by far the risk factor representing the greatest cost to French society in 2010 at between 531 and 1,538 million euros (58-71%), ahead of diesel engine exhaust, representing an estimated social cost of between 233 and 336 million euros, and crystalline silica (119-229 million euros). Indirect costs represented about 66% of total costs. CONCLUSION: Our assessment shows the magnitude of the economic impact of occupational respiratory cancers. It allows comparisons between countries and provides valuable information for policy-makers responsible for defining public health priorities.
PURPOSE: The objective of this article was to estimate the social cost of respiratory cancer cases attributable to occupational risk factors in France in 2010. METHODS: According to the attributable fraction method and based on available epidemiological data from the literature, we estimated the number of respiratory cancer cases due to each identified risk factor. We used the cost-of-illness method with a prevalence-based approach. We took into account the direct and indirect costs. We estimated the cost of production losses due to morbidity (absenteeism and presenteeism) and mortality costs (years of production losses) in the market and nonmarket spheres. RESULTS: The social cost of lung, larynx, sinonasal and mesothelioma cancer caused by exposure to asbestos, chromium, diesel engine exhaust, paint, crystalline silica, wood and leather dust in France in 2010 were estimated at between 917 and 2,181 million euros. Between 795 and 2,011 million euros (87-92%) of total costs were due to lung cancer alone. Asbestos was by far the risk factor representing the greatest cost to French society in 2010 at between 531 and 1,538 million euros (58-71%), ahead of diesel engine exhaust, representing an estimated social cost of between 233 and 336 million euros, and crystalline silica (119-229 million euros). Indirect costs represented about 66% of total costs. CONCLUSION: Our assessment shows the magnitude of the economic impact of occupational respiratory cancers. It allows comparisons between countries and provides valuable information for policy-makers responsible for defining public health priorities.
Authors: Deborah Imel Nelson; Marisol Concha-Barrientos; Timothy Driscoll; Kyle Steenland; Marilyn Fingerhut; Laura Punnett; Annette Prüss-Ustün; James Leigh; Carlos Corvalan Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: P A Demers; P Boffetta; M Kogevinas; A Blair; B A Miller; C F Robinson; R J Roscoe; P D Winter; D Colin; E Matos Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Laurent Borella; Stéphane Finkel; Nicolas Crapeau; Patrick Peuvrel; Martine Sauvage; Lionel Perrier; Eric Lepage; Jean Villeminot; Bernard Garrigues Journal: Bull Cancer Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 1.276