Literature DB >> 9571523

What percentage of workers with work-related illnesses receive workers' compensation benefits?

J Biddle1, K Roberts, K D Rosenman, E M Welch.   

Abstract

This study estimates the rate at which workers suffering from occupational illnesses file for workers' compensation lost wage benefits and identifies some of the factors that affect the probability that a worker with an occupational illness will file. A database of reports of known or suspected cases of occupational illness is matched with workers' compensation claims data. Overall, between 9% and 45% of reported workers file for benefits. Data limitations prevent a more precise estimate of this rate, but a large proportion of workers with occupational illnesses clearly does not utilize the worker's compensation system. Logit analysis of a choice-based sample shows that women and employees of small firms are more likely than others to file for worker's compensation and that filing rates vary considerably across industries and diagnostic categories. Acute conditions related to the current job are no more likely to lead to claims than chronic conditions with long latency periods between exposure and development of disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9571523     DOI: 10.1097/00043764-199804000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  34 in total

Review 1.  Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: design as a prevention strategy. A review.

Authors:  T Amell; S Kumar
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-12

Review 2.  The importance of occupational skin diseases in the United States.

Authors:  Boris D Lushniak
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Occupational injury and illness surveillance: conceptual filters explain underreporting.

Authors:  Lenore S Azaroff; Charles Levenstein; David H Wegman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Declining trends in work-related morbidity and disability, 1993-1998: a comparison of survey estimates and compensation insurance claims.

Authors:  Cam Mustard; Donald Cole; Harry Shannon; Jason Pole; Terry Sullivan; Richard Allingham
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Isocyanates and work-related asthma: Findings from California, Massachusetts, Michigan, and New Jersey, 1993-2008.

Authors:  Daniel Lefkowitz; Elise Pechter; Kathleen Fitzsimmons; Margaret Lumia; Alicia C Stephens; Letitia Davis; Jennifer Flattery; Justine Weinberg; Robert J Harrison; Mary Jo Reilly; Margaret S Filios; Gretchen E White; Kenneth D Rosenman
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  The consequences of underreporting workers' compensation claims.

Authors:  Aaron Thompson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Community campaigns, supply chains, and protecting the health and well-being of workers.

Authors:  Michael Quinlan; Rosemary K Sokas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  A conceptual framework for integrating workplace health promotion and occupational ergonomics programs.

Authors:  Laura Punnett; Martin Cherniack; Robert Henning; Tim Morse; Pouran Faghri
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  Occupational disease and workers' compensation: coverage, costs, and consequences.

Authors:  J Paul Leigh; John A Robbins
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.911

10.  Information and feedback to improve occupational physicians' reporting of occupational diseases: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Annet F Lenderink; Dick Spreeuwers; Jac J L van der Klink; Frank J H van Dijk
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.015

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.