Literature DB >> 2397487

Determination of aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography using the continuity equation: a critical evaluation.

H Baumgartner1, H Kratzer, G Helmreich, P Kuehn.   

Abstract

In 35 patients with aortic stenosis the Doppler-derived values of the aortic valve area (continuity equation) were compared with those determined at cardiac catheterization (Gorlin's formula). The comparison of three modifications of the continuity equation showed that the procedure generally proposed (calculating the area of the left ventricular outflow tract from its diameter) significantly underestimated the valve area (modification 1). Modification 2, which used direct planimetry of the left ventricular outflow tract, yielded results quite consistent with invasive measurements. The employment of peak velocities instead of velocity-time integrals (modification 3) did not significantly alter the results. However, the scatter was considerable in all three modifications. When critical aortic stenosis was defined with a valve area less than or equal to 0.70 cm2, modifications 1, 2, and 3 accurately predicted the severity of stenosis in 80, 86, and 80%, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2397487     DOI: 10.1159/000174590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiology        ISSN: 0008-6312            Impact factor:   1.869


  12 in total

1.  Assessing aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by continuity equation: a novel approach using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  Kian Keong Poh; Robert A Levine; Jorge Solis; Liang Shen; Mary Flaherty; Yue-Jian Kang; J Luis Guerrero; Judy Hung
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 2.  [Assessment of systolic function in patients with poor echogenicity: echocardiographic methods].

Authors:  F Weidemann; D Liu; M Niemann; S Herrmann; H Hu; P D Gaudron; G Ertl; K Hu
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  MRI for diagnosing aortic valve stenosis: a comparison study of MRI and ultrasound.

Authors:  C van Pul; N M C M de Jong; L M van Beek; H L M Pasmans; P F F Wijn; R F Visser
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Natural progression of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Antony Leslie Innasimuthu; Sanjay Kumar; Jason Lazar; William E Katz
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2014-06-01

5.  Normal mitral and aortic valve areas assessed by three- and two-dimensional echocardiography in 168 children and young adults.

Authors:  T Poutanen; T Tikanoja; H Sairanen; E Jokinen
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 6.  The contemporary role of echocardiography in the assessment and management of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Takeshi Kitai; Rayji S Tsutsui
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 1.314

7.  Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Julio Garcia; Lyes Kadem; Eric Larose; Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Outcomes of Patients With Severe Symptomatic Aortic Valve Stenosis After Chest Radiation: Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Dongfeng Zhang; Wei Guo; Mohammed A Al-Hijji; Abdallah El Sabbagh; Bradley R Lewis; Kevin Greason; Gurpreet S Sandhu; Mackram F Eleid; David R Holmes; Joerg Herrmann
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Impact of left ventricular outflow tract flow acceleration on aortic valve area calculation in patients with aortic stenosis

Authors:  Andaleeb A Ahmed; Robina Matyal; Feroze Mahmood; Ruby Feng; Graham B Berry; Scott Gilleland; Kamal R Khabbaz
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2019-11-04

10.  Pathologic Shear and Elongation Rates Do Not Cause Cleavage of Von Willebrand Factor by ADAMTS13 in a Purified System.

Authors:  Maria Bortot; Alireza Sharifi; Katrina Ashworth; Faye Walker; Allaura Cox; Katherine Ruegg; Nathan Clendenen; Keith B Neeves; David Bark; Jorge Di Paola
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.