A B McCoy1, A Wright, G Eysenbach, B A Malin, E S Patterson, H Xu, D F Sittig. 1. Center for Healthcare Quality & Safety, The University of Texas, Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), 6410 Fannin St., UTP 1100.43, Houston, TX 77030, USA. E-mail: Dean.F.Sittig@uth.tmc.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The field of clinical informatics has expanded substantially in the six decades since its inception. Early research focused on simple demonstrations that health information technology (HIT) such as electronic health records (EHRs), computerized provider order entry (CPOE), and clinical decision support (CDS) systems were feasible and potentially beneficial in clinical practice. METHODS: In this review, we present recent evidence on clinical informatics in the United States covering three themes: 1) clinical informatics systems and interventions for providers, including EHRs, CPOE, CDS, and health information exchange; 2) consumer health informatics systems, including personal health records and web-based and mobile HIT; and 3) methods and governance for clinical informatics, including EHR usability; data mining, text mining, natural language processing, privacy, and security. RESULTS: Substantial progress has been made in demonstrating that various clinical informatics methodologies and applications improve the structure, process, and outcomes of various facets of the healthcare system. CONCLUSION: Over the coming years, much more will be expected from the field. As we move past the "early adopters" in Rogers' diffusion of innovations' curve through the "early majority" and into the "late majority," there will be a crucial need for new research methodologies and clinical applications that have been rigorously demonstrated to work (i.e., to improve health outcomes) in multiple settings with different types of patients and clinicians.
OBJECTIVE: The field of clinical informatics has expanded substantially in the six decades since its inception. Early research focused on simple demonstrations that health information technology (HIT) such as electronic health records (EHRs), computerized provider order entry (CPOE), and clinical decision support (CDS) systems were feasible and potentially beneficial in clinical practice. METHODS: In this review, we present recent evidence on clinical informatics in the United States covering three themes: 1) clinical informatics systems and interventions for providers, including EHRs, CPOE, CDS, and health information exchange; 2) consumer health informatics systems, including personal health records and web-based and mobile HIT; and 3) methods and governance for clinical informatics, including EHR usability; data mining, text mining, natural language processing, privacy, and security. RESULTS: Substantial progress has been made in demonstrating that various clinical informatics methodologies and applications improve the structure, process, and outcomes of various facets of the healthcare system. CONCLUSION: Over the coming years, much more will be expected from the field. As we move past the "early adopters" in Rogers' diffusion of innovations' curve through the "early majority" and into the "late majority," there will be a crucial need for new research methodologies and clinical applications that have been rigorously demonstrated to work (i.e., to improve health outcomes) in multiple settings with different types of patients and clinicians.
Authors: Adam Wright; Joan S Ash; Skye Aaron; Angela Ai; Thu-Trang T Hickman; Jane F Wiesen; William Galanter; Allison B McCoy; Richard Schreiber; Christopher A Longhurst; Dean F Sittig Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: David S Carrell; Robert E Schoen; Daniel A Leffler; Michele Morris; Sherri Rose; Andrew Baer; Seth D Crockett; Rebecca A Gourevitch; Katie M Dean; Ateev Mehrotra Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Mary E Cooley; Janet L Abrahm; Donna L Berry; Michael S Rabin; Ilana M Braun; Joanna Paladino; Manan M Nayak; David F Lobach Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Adam Wright; Angela Ai; Joan Ash; Jane F Wiesen; Thu-Trang T Hickman; Skye Aaron; Dustin McEvoy; Shane Borkowsky; Pavithra I Dissanayake; Peter Embi; William Galanter; Jeremy Harper; Steve Z Kassakian; Rachel Ramoni; Richard Schreiber; Anwar Sirajuddin; David W Bates; Dean F Sittig Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Hannah P Truong; Alina A Luke; Gmerice Hammond; Rishi K Wadhera; Mat Reidhead; Karen E Joynt Maddox Journal: Med Care Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 3.178