Literature DB >> 23973932

Limited value of plasma cytokeratin-18 as a biomarker for NASH and fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Kenneth Cusi1, Zhi Chang2, Steve Harrison3, Romina Lomonaco2, Fernando Bril2, Beverly Orsak2, Carolina Ortiz-Lopez2, Joan Hecht4, Ariel E Feldstein5, Amy Webb6, Christopher Louden7, Martin Goros7, Fermin Tio8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Liver biopsy is the only reliable way of diagnosing and staging NASH but its invasive nature limits its use. Plasma caspase-generated cytokeratin-18 fragments (CK-18) have been proposed as a non-invasive alternative. We studied its clinical value in a large multiethnic NAFLD population and examined its relationship to clinical/metabolic/histological parameters.
METHODS: 424 middle-aged subjects in whom we measured adipose tissue, liver and muscle insulin resistance (IR), liver fat by MRS (n=275) and histology (n=318).
RESULTS: Median CK-18 were elevated in patients with vs. without NAFLD by MRS (209 [IQR: 137-329] vs. 122 [IQR: 98-155]U/L) or with vs. without NASH (232 [IQR: 151-387] vs. 170 [IQR: 135-234]U/L, both p<0.001). Plasma CK-18 raised significantly with any increase in steatosis, inflammation and fibrosis, but there was a significant overlap across disease severity. The CK-18 AUROC to predict NAFLD, NASH or fibrosis were 0.77 (95% CI=0.71-0.84), 0.65 (95% CI=0.59-0.71) and 0.68 (95% CI=0.61-0.75), respectively. The overall sensitivity/specificity for NAFLD, NASH and fibrosis were 63% (57-70%)/83% (69-92%), 58% (51-65%)/68% (59-76%) and 54% (44-63%)/85% (75-92%), respectively. CK-18 correlated most strongly with ALT (r=0.57, p<0.0001) and adipose tissue IR (insulin-suppression of FFA: r=-0.43; p<0.001), less with steatosis, lobular inflammation and fibrosis (r=0.28-0.34, all p<0.001), but not with ballooning, BMI, metabolic syndrome or T2DM.
CONCLUSIONS: Plasma CK-18 has a high specificity for NAFLD and fibrosis, but its limited sensitivity makes it inadequate as a screening test for staging NASH. Whether combined as a diagnostic panel with other biomarkers or clinical/laboratory tests may prove useful requires further study.
Copyright © 2013 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytokeratin-18; Diabetes; Fatty liver; Insulin resistance; NAFLD; NASH

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23973932     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.07.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatol        ISSN: 0168-8278            Impact factor:   25.083


  79 in total

1.  Imaging prediction of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis using computed tomography texture analysis.

Authors:  Shotaro Naganawa; Kenichiro Enooku; Ryosuke Tateishi; Hiroyuki Akai; Koichiro Yasaka; Junji Shibahara; Tetsuo Ushiku; Osamu Abe; Kuni Ohtomo; Shigeru Kiryu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Role of diet on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: An updated narrative review.

Authors:  Dimitrios Papandreou; Eleni Andreou
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-03-27

Review 3.  Composite prognostic models across the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease spectrum: Clinical application in developing countries.

Authors:  Hilmar K Lückhoff; Frederik C Kruger; Maritha J Kotze
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-05-28

4.  Liver Injury and Endotoxemia in Male and Female Alcohol-Dependent Individuals Admitted to an Alcohol Treatment Program.

Authors:  Irina A Kirpich; Craig J McClain; Vatsalya Vatsalya; Melanie Schwandt; Monte Phillips; Keith Cameron Falkner; Lucy Zhang; Catey Harwell; David T George; John C Umhau
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Relationship between changes in serum levels of keratin 18 and changes in liver histology in children and adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Raj Vuppalanchi; Ajay K Jain; Ross Deppe; Katherine Yates; Megan Comerford; Howard C Masuoka; Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri; Rohit Loomba; Elizabeth M Brunt; David E Kleiner; Jean P Molleston; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Joel E Lavine; James Tonascia; Naga Chalasani
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 7.  NAFLD and liver transplantation: Current burden and expected challenges.

Authors:  Raluca Pais; A Sidney Barritt; Yvon Calmus; Olivier Scatton; Thomas Runge; Pascal Lebray; Thierry Poynard; Vlad Ratziu; Filomena Conti
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 25.083

8.  The Role of Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Elastography in the Diagnosis of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in Obese Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Alina M Allen; Vijay H Shah; Terry M Therneau; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Taofic Mounajjed; Joseph J Larson; Kristin C Mara; Phillip J Schulte; Todd A Kellogg; Michael L Kendrick; Travis J McKenzie; Suzanne M Greiner; Jiahui Li; Kevin J Glaser; Michael L Wells; Jun Chen; Richard L Ehman; Meng Yin
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  Serum-inducible protein (IP)-10 is a disease progression-related marker for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Nozomu Wada; Akinobu Takaki; Fusao Ikeda; Tetsuya Yasunaka; Masahiro Onji; Kazuhiro Nouso; Atsuko Nakatsuka; Jun Wada; Kazuko Koike; Koji Miyahara; Hidenori Shiraha; Kazuhide Yamamoto; Hiroyuki Okada
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 6.047

10.  Poor Inter-test Reliability Between CK18 Kits as a Biomarker of NASH.

Authors:  Carolina F M G Pimentel; Zhenghui G Jiang; Takeshi Otsubo; Linda Feldbrügge; Tracy L Challies; Imad Nasser; Simon Robson; Nezam Afdhal; Michelle Lai
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.