Nozomu Wada1, Akinobu Takaki2, Fusao Ikeda1, Tetsuya Yasunaka1, Masahiro Onji1, Kazuhiro Nouso1, Atsuko Nakatsuka3, Jun Wada3, Kazuko Koike1, Koji Miyahara1, Hidenori Shiraha1, Kazuhide Yamamoto1, Hiroyuki Okada1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan. 2. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan. akitaka@md.okayama-u.ac.jp. 3. Department of Medical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The molecular pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is not well defined. The objective of the present study was to identify disease progression-related cytokines and investigate the molecular pathogenesis of such changes in NASH. METHODS: A study population of 20 non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) and 59 NASH patients diagnosed by liver biopsy and 15 healthy volunteers was recruited. The serum pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines were measured by a multiple enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The hepatic mRNA expressions of cytokines were measured by real-time PCR. A monocyte cell line was stimulated with Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligand under a high glucose and insulin condition, and cellular cytokine mRNA expression was quantified. RESULTS: One group of cytokines was higher in NAFL and NASH than in controls, while another group was higher in NASH than in NAFL and controls. The NASH-specific second group included interleukin (IL)-15 and interferon-γ-inducible protein (IP)-10. In particular, IP-10 was higher in NAFL than in controls and higher in NASH than in NAFL and controls. The sensitivity to diagnose NASH was 90%, with specificity of 50%. Insulin resistance reflecting a high glucose and insulin condition resulted in higher IP-10 mRNA expression in the monocyte cell line only with concomitant TLR-2 stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: IP-10 is a sensitive marker of the need for liver biopsy. Insulin resistance with bacteria-related TLR-2 stimulation might induce IP-10 production from monocytes. Insulin resistance and intestinal barrier function should be intensively controlled to prevent progression from NAFL to NASH.
BACKGROUND: The molecular pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is not well defined. The objective of the present study was to identify disease progression-related cytokines and investigate the molecular pathogenesis of such changes in NASH. METHODS: A study population of 20 non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) and 59 NASH patients diagnosed by liver biopsy and 15 healthy volunteers was recruited. The serum pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines were measured by a multiple enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The hepatic mRNA expressions of cytokines were measured by real-time PCR. A monocyte cell line was stimulated with Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligand under a high glucose and insulin condition, and cellular cytokine mRNA expression was quantified. RESULTS: One group of cytokines was higher in NAFL and NASH than in controls, while another group was higher in NASH than in NAFL and controls. The NASH-specific second group included interleukin (IL)-15 and interferon-γ-inducible protein (IP)-10. In particular, IP-10 was higher in NAFL than in controls and higher in NASH than in NAFL and controls. The sensitivity to diagnose NASH was 90%, with specificity of 50%. Insulin resistance reflecting a high glucose and insulin condition resulted in higher IP-10 mRNA expression in the monocyte cell line only with concomitant TLR-2 stimulation. CONCLUSIONS:IP-10 is a sensitive marker of the need for liver biopsy. Insulin resistance with bacteria-related TLR-2 stimulation might induce IP-10 production from monocytes. Insulin resistance and intestinal barrier function should be intensively controlled to prevent progression from NAFL to NASH.
Authors: L Pacifico; C Anania; F Martino; E Poggiogalle; F Chiarelli; M Arca; C Chiesa Journal: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 4.222
Authors: Xiang Zhang; Jiayun Shen; Kwan Man; Eagle S H Chu; Tung On Yau; Joanne C Y Sung; Minnie Y Y Go; Jun Deng; Liwei Lu; Vincent W S Wong; Joseph J Y Sung; Geoffrey Farrell; Jun Yu Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Elizabeth M Brunt; David E Kleiner; Laura A Wilson; Aynur Unalp; Cynthia E Behling; Joel E Lavine; Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri Journal: Hepatology Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Marija Zeremski; Lydia M Petrovic; Luis Chiriboga; Queenie B Brown; Herman T Yee; Milan Kinkhabwala; Ira M Jacobson; Rositsa Dimova; Marianthi Markatou; Andrew H Talal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Jorge Henao-Mejia; Eran Elinav; Chengcheng Jin; Liming Hao; Wajahat Z Mehal; Till Strowig; Christoph A Thaiss; Andrew L Kau; Stephanie C Eisenbarth; Michael J Jurczak; Joao-Paulo Camporez; Gerald I Shulman; Jeffrey I Gordon; Hal M Hoffman; Richard A Flavell Journal: Nature Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Teresa Auguet; Laia Bertran; Jessica Binetti; Carmen Aguilar; Salomé Martínez; Fàtima Sabench; Jesús Miguel Lopez-Dupla; José Antonio Porras; David Riesco; Daniel Del Castillo; Cristóbal Richart Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 5.923