Literature DB >> 23972785

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring in spine surgery. Developments and state of the art in France in 2011.

M Gavaret1, J L Jouve, Y Péréon, F Accadbled, N André-Obadia, E Azabou, B Blondel, G Bollini, J Delécrin, J-P Farcy, J Fournet-Fayard, C Garin, P Henry, V Manel, V Mutschler, G Perrin, J Sales de Gauzy.   

Abstract

Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring consists in a subcontinuous evaluation of spinal cord sensory-motor functions and allows the reduction the incidence of neurological complications resulting from spinal surgery. A combination of techniques is used: somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), motor evoked potentials (MEP), neurogenic motor evoked potentials (NMEP), D waves, and pedicular screw testing. In absence of intraoperative neurophysiological testing, the intraoperative wake-up test is a true form of monitoring even if its latency long and its precision variable. A 2011 survey of 117 French spinal surgeons showed that only 36% had neurophysiological monitoring available (public healthcare facilities, 42%; private facilities, 27%). Monitoring can be performed by a neurophysiologist in the operating room, remotely using a network, or directly by the surgeon. Intraoperative alerts allow real-time diagnosis of impending neurological injury. Use of spinal electrodes, moved along the medullary canal, can determine the lesion level (NMEP, D waves). The response to a monitoring alert should take into account the phase of the surgical intervention and does not systematically lead to interruption of the intervention. Multimodal intraoperative monitoring, in presence of a neurophysiologist, in collaboration with the anesthesiologist, is the most reliable technique available. However, no monitoring technique can predict a delayed-onset paraplegia that appears after the end of surgery. In cases of preexisting neurological deficit, monitoring contributes little. Monitoring of the L1-L4 spinal roots also shows low reliability. Therefore, monitoring has no indication in discal and degenerative surgery of the spinal surgery. However, testing pedicular screws can be useful. All in all, thoracic and thoracolumbar vertebral deviations, with normal preoperative neurological examination are currently the essential indication for spinal cord monitoring. Its absence in this indication is a lost opportunity for the patient. If neurophysiological means are not available, intraoperative wake-up test is a minimal obligation.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kyphosis; Motor evoked potentials; Multimodal spinal cord monitoring; Neurogenic motor evoked potentials; Scoliosis; Somatosensory evoked potentials

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23972785     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  10 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Jong-Hwa Park; Seung-Jae Hyun
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Indication and technical implementation of the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgeries-a transnational survey in the German-speaking countries.

Authors:  Sebastian Siller; Constance Raith; Stefan Zausinger; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Andrea Szelenyi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring in children under 4 years old.

Authors:  Martine Gavaret; Sébastien Pesenti; Elie Choufani; Daniela Pennaroli; Gérard Bollini; Jean-Luc Jouve
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the lumbar spine: indications, technical aspects, results and complications.

Authors:  Cedric Barrey; Gilles Perrin; Frederic Michel; Jean-Marc Vital; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-05-07

5.  Validity and utility of monopolar spinal cord stimulation in pediatric scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Constantin Gomes; Mathieu Kuchenbuch; Grégory Lucas; Soizic Argaud; Philippe Violas; Paul Sauleau
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  How safe is minimally invasive pedicle screw placement for treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures?

Authors:  Timo Michael Heintel; Stefan Dannigkeit; Annabel Fenwick; Martin Cornelius Jordan; Hendrik Jansen; Fabian Gilbert; Rainer Meffert
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Sublaminar bands: are they safe?

Authors:  E Polirsztok; M Gavaret; T Gsell; I Suprano; E Choufani; G Bollini; Jean-Luc Jouve
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Comparison of proximal junctional kyphosis rate according to fusion level.

Authors:  Görkem Kıyak; Tevfik Balıkçı; Murat Bezer
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-07-08

Review 9.  Neurophysiological assessment of spinal cord injuries in dogs using somatosensory and motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  Maria Claudia Campos Mello Inglez de Souza; Ricardo José Rodriguez Ferreira; Geni Cristina Fonseca Patricio; Julia Maria Matera
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 1.695

10.  Intraoperative herniation of an L5-S1 disc during microdiscectomy and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a case report.

Authors:  Connor D Berlin; Thirumoorthi V Seshan; John M Abrahams; Ezriel E Kornel
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2015-11-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.