Literature DB >> 23971987

Visual search performance in the neglect syndrome.

M Eglin1, L C Robertson, R T Knight.   

Abstract

Patients with hemispatial neglect fail to respond to stimuli on one side of space. We assessed to what extent the complexity and number of visual stimuli on both sides determine the severity of neglect. Patients with neglect were required to find specified targets in a cluttered visual field. Two sets of stimuli were used. One set produced effortless and parallel search performance in normal controls; the other set was more complex and produced serial search performance in normal controls. Both sets of stimuli resulted in a serial performance pattern in the patients. Their baseline search performance on both sides was similar when all stimulus items were restricted to one side. A pronounced difference between the two sides was evident when stimuli appeared on both sides. Search for targets on the intact side of space was unaffected by distractors on the neglected side, whereas search for targets on the neglected side was slowed disproportionately by distractors on the intact side. The slowing on the neglected side was more severe during the more demanding search task and when more items were present on the intact side. The results indicate that neglect is associated with an inability to move attention from objects on the intact side to items on the neglected side.

Entities:  

Year:  1989        PMID: 23971987     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1989.1.4.372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  18 in total

Review 1.  Binding, spatial attention and perceptual awareness.

Authors:  Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Grouping influences in unilateral visual neglect.

Authors:  Lynn C Robertson; Mirjam Eglin; Robert Knight
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.475

3.  Visual hemispatial neglect, re-assessed.

Authors:  Alexandra List; Joseph L Brooks; Michael Esterman; Anastasia V Flevaris; Ayelet N Landau; Glen Bowman; Victoria Stanton; Thomas M Vanvleet; Lynn C Robertson; Krista Schendel
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.892

4.  Local (focussed) and global (distributed) visual processing in hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  Andrea Peru; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Implicit representation and explicit detection of features in patients with hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  Thomas M Van Vleet; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Prism adaptation reverses the local processing bias in patients with right temporo-parietal junction lesions.

Authors:  Janet H Bultitude; Robert D Rafal; Alexandra List
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Unconscious activation of motor responses in a hemiplegic patient with anosognosia and neglect.

Authors:  H Hildebrandt; A Zieger
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.270

8.  Task set induces dynamic reallocation of resources in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Summer L Sheremata; Sarah Shomstein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

9.  The assessment of hemineglect syndrome with cancellation tasks: a comparison between the Bells test and the Apples test.

Authors:  Benedetta Basagni; Antonio De Tanti; Alessio Damora; Laura Abbruzzese; Valentina Varalta; Gabriella Antonucci; Wai Ling Bickerton; Nicola Smania; Mauro Mancuso
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.307

10.  The countervailing forces of binding and selection in vision.

Authors:  Adam C Snyder; John J Foxe
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 4.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.