Literature DB >> 18297278

Local (focussed) and global (distributed) visual processing in hemispatial neglect.

Andrea Peru1, Leonardo Chelazzi.   

Abstract

In the present study we set out to investigate deficits of focussed and distributed attention (and their interaction) in brain-damaged patients. To this purpose, four left brain damaged (LBD) patients without signs of hemispatial neglect and six right brain damaged (RBD) patients with variable signs of hemispatial neglect were tested by means of an experimental paradigm comprising two embedded tasks performed on the same visual array. The first task (i.e. counting the number of shapes, 1-4, briefly displayed) mainly involved distributed attention rather than focussed attention. The second task was a typical target detection task, which emphasized the detailed analysis of each element in the array, thus mainly tapping focussed attention. Results clearly showed that: (1) LBD patients are slightly impaired at directing focussed attention to the contralesional visual hemifield; (2) in comparison to LBD patients, RBD patients with mild neglect show an exaggerated difficulty in orienting focussed attention toward the contralesional side, while they are similarly unimpaired in the deployment of distributed attention, i.e. in global processing; (3) RBD patients with the most severe neglect suffer from a deficit of both local and global visual processing, i.e. of both focussed and distributed attention. Taken together, these observations indicate that focussed and distributed components of visual attentional processing may be differentially affected in left and right brain-damaged patients with and without neglect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18297278     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1315-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Single-trial classification of parallel pre-attentive and serial attentive processes using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Manuela Piazza; Eric Giacomini; Denis Le Bihan; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  How the deployment of attention determines what we see.

Authors:  Anne Treisman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2006-08-01

3.  Visual Processing without Awareness: Evidence from Unilateral Neglect.

Authors:  A Berti; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The role of attention in subitizing.

Authors:  Henry Railo; Mika Koivisto; Antti Revonsuo; Minna M Hannula
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-10-17

5.  Influence of stimulus salience and attentional demands on visual search patterns in hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  S Aglioti; N Smania; C Barbieri; M Corbetta
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Preattentive and attentive visual search in individuals with hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  M Esterman; R McGlinchey-Berroth; W Milberg
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  The inferior temporal lobe mediates distracter-resistant visual search of patients with spatial neglect.

Authors:  Radek Ptak; Nathalie Valenza
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: a critical look at the evidence.

Authors:  L Chelazzi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1999

9.  Left visuo-spatial neglect: a meaningless entity?

Authors:  P W Halligan; J C Marshall
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Phasic alerting of neglect patients overcomes their spatial deficit in visual awareness.

Authors:  I H Robertson; J B Mattingley; C Rorden; J Driver
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-09-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  3 in total

1.  Adaptation to leftward-shifting prisms enhances local processing in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Scott A Reed; Paul Dassonville
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Visual search in spatial neglect studied with a preview paradigm.

Authors:  Julia Fellrath; Vanessa Blanche-Durbec; Armin Schnider; Anne-Sophie Jacquemoud; Radek Ptak
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  A circle-monitor for computerised assessment of visual neglect in peripersonal space.

Authors:  Lena Ulm; Dorota Wohlrapp; Marcus Meinzer; Robert Steinicke; Alexej Schatz; Petra Denzler; Juliane Klehmet; Christian Dohle; Michael Niedeggen; Andreas Meisel; York Winter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.