Literature DB >> 23971763

Reoperation rates and impact on outcome in a large, prospective, multicenter, adult spinal deformity database: clinical article.

Justin K Scheer1, Jessica A Tang, Justin S Smith, Eric Klineberg, Robert A Hart, Gregory M Mundis, Douglas C Burton, Richard Hostin, Michael F O'Brien, Shay Bess, Khaled M Kebaish, Vedat Deviren, Virginie Lafage, Frank Schwab, Christopher I Shaffrey, Christopher P Ames.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Complications and reoperation for surgery to correct adult spinal deformity are not infrequent, and many studies have analyzed the rates and factors that influence the likelihood of reoperation. However, there is a need for more comprehensive analyses of reoperation in adult spinal deformity surgery from a global standpoint, particularly focusing on the 1st year following operation and considering radiographic parameters and the effects of reoperation on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This study attempts to determine the prevalence of reoperation following surgery for adult spinal deformity, assess the indications for these reoperations, evaluate for a relation between specific radiographic parameters and the need for reoperation, and determine the potential impact of reoperation on HRQOL measures.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of a prospective, multicenter, adult spinal deformity database collected through the International Spine Study Group. Data collected included age, body mass index, sex, date of surgery, information regarding complications, reoperation dates, length of stay, and operation time. The radiographic parameters assessed were total number of levels instrumented, total number of interbody fusions, C-7 sagittal vertical axis, uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) location, and presence of 3-column osteotomies. The HRQOL assessment included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey physical component and mental component summary, and SRS-22 scores. Smoking history, Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification grades were also collected and assessed for correlation with risk of early reoperation. Various statistical tests were performed for evaluation of specific factors listed above, and the level of significance was set at p < 0.05.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine (17%) of a total of 352 patients required reoperation. Forty-four (12.5%) of the reoperations occurred within 1 year after the initial surgery, including 17 reoperations (5%) within 30 days. Two hundred sixty-eight patients had a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. Fifty-three (20%) of these patients had a 3-column osteotomy, and 10 (19%) of these 53 required reoperation within 1 year of the initial procedure. However, 3-column osteotomy was not predictive of reoperation within 1 year, p = 0.5476). There were no significant differences between groups with regard to the distribution of UIV, and UIV did not have a significant effect on reoperation rates. Patients needing reoperation within 1 year had worse ODI and SRS-22 scores measured at 1-year follow-up than patients not requiring operation.
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of data from a large multicenter adult spinal deformity database shows an overall 17% reoperation rate, with a 19% reoperation rate for patients treated with 3-column osteotomy and a 16% reoperation rate for patients not treated with 3-column osteotomy. The most common indications for reoperation included instrumentation complications and radiographic failure. Reoperation significantly affected HRQOL outcomes at 1-year follow-up. The need for reoperation may be minimized by carefully considering spinal alignment, termination of fixation, and type of surgical procedure (presence of osteotomy). Precautions should be taken to avoid malposition or instrumentation (rod) failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23971763     DOI: 10.3171/2013.7.SPINE12901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  22 in total

Review 1.  [Correction of kyphotic fixed lumbar segments and hypolordosis with the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion technique].

Authors:  F Lattig; E Stettin; S Weckbach
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Lack of improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores 6 months after surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) predicts high revision rate in the second postoperative year.

Authors:  Anouar Bourghli; Louis Boissiere; Daniel Larrieu; Jean-Marc Vital; Caglar Yilgor; Ferran Pellisé; Ahmet Alanay; Emre Acaroglu; Francisco-Javier Perez-Grueso; Franck Kleinstück; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Recovery following adult spinal deformity surgery: the effect of complications and reoperation in 149 patients with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Justin K Scheer; Gregory M Mundis; Eric Klineberg; Robert A Hart; Vedat Deviren; Douglas C Burton; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Munish Gupta; John D Rolston; Shay Bess; Christopher I Shaffrey; Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Justin S Smith; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Does Patient Sex Affect the Rate of Mortality and Complications After Spine Surgery? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrew J Schoenfeld; Elyse N Reamer; Emily I Wynkoop; Hwajung Choi; Christopher M Bono
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Impact of resolved early major complications on 2-year follow-up outcome following adult spinal deformity surgery.

Authors:  Susana Núñez-Pereira; Ferran Pellisé; Alba Vila-Casademunt; Ahmet Alanay; Emre Acaraglou; Ibrahim Obeid; Francisco Javier Sánchez Pérez-Grueso; Frank Kleinstück
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Factors influencing radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis surgery: a study of 448 European patients.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Conny Pfanz; Oliver Meier; Wolfgang Hitzl; Michael Mayer; Viola Bullmann; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Adult spine deformity surgery in elderly patients: are outcomes worse in patients 75 years and older?

Authors:  Zachary R Lovato; David G Deckey; Andrew S Chung; Dennis G Crandall; Jan Revella; Michael S Chang
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-07-21

8.  Prevalence and Indications for Unplanned Reoperations Following Index Surgery in the Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis NIH-Sponsored Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Charles H Crawford; Steven D Glassman; Leah Y Carreon; Christopher I Shaffrey; Tyler R Koski; Christine R Baldus; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2018 Nov - Dec

9.  Impact of Increasing Age on Outcomes of Spinal Fusion in Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Terence Verla; Owoicho Adogwa; Ulysses Toche; S Harrison Farber; Frank Petraglia; Kelly R Murphy; Steven Thomas; Parastou Fatemi; Oren Gottfried; Carlos A Bagley; Shivanand P Lad
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.104

10.  Revision surgery for degenerative spinal deformity: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Pasquale Donnarumma; Roberto Tarantino; Lorenzo Nigro; Maria Fragale; Roberto Bassani; Roberto Delfini
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2017-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.