Literature DB >> 23971452

Comparison of segmental enhancement inversion on biphasic MDCT between small renal oncocytomas and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas.

Sungmin Woo1, Jeong Yeon Cho, Seung Hyup Kim, Sang Youn Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to assess the usefulness of segmental enhancement inversion on biphasic MDCT in differentiating small (<4 cm) renal oncocytomas from chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (CRCCs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-two patients (40 men and 42 women) with a mean (±SD) age of 54±12 years (range, 21-75 years) with 27 renal oncocytomas and 55 CRCCs diagnosed by surgery who underwent contrast-enhanced biphasic CT between January 2000 and December 2011 were included. CT scans were interpreted by two radiologists who were blinded to the pathologic findings. The tumors were evaluated for size and segmental enhancement inversion. After independent evaluation, a consensus was reached by measuring the attenuation. Pathologic analysis determined the presence of fibrous septa, cystic change, hemorrhage, and necrosis. The Fisher exact test was used to evaluate the relationship between segmental enhancement inversion, tumor type, and specific pathologic changes. Interobserver concordance was evaluated with kappa statistics.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in size between renal oncocytomas and CRCCs (p=0.458). Segmental enhancement inversion was present in 23, 20, and 21 (25.6%) of the 82 tumors according to reader 1, reader 2, and the consensus, respectively. The agreement was almost perfect (κ=0.843; p<0.001). Segmental enhancement inversion was more common in renal oncocytomas (63% [17/27]) than in CRCCs (7.3% [4/55]; p<0.001). There were no significant relationships between the four pathologic changes and tumor type or segmental enhancement inversion (p=0.351 and p=0.126, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Our study findings suggest that segmental enhancement inversion on biphasic MDCT may be useful in differentiating small renal oncocytomas from CRCCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23971452     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.10372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  11 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of segmental enhancement inversion for the diagnosis of renal oncocytoma using biphasic computed tomography (CT) and multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Authors:  Nicola Schieda; Maali Al-Subhi; Trevor A Flood; Mohammed El-Khodary; Matthew D F McInnes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Solid renal masses: what the numbers tell us.

Authors:  Stella K Kang; William C Huang; Pari V Pandharipande; Hersh Chandarana
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Diagnostic accuracy of segmental enhancement inversion for diagnosis of renal oncocytoma at biphasic contrast enhanced CT: systematic review.

Authors:  Nicola Schieda; Matthew D F McInnes; Lilly Cao
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Unilateral renal oncocytosis and combined hybrid tumor: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Mack Shin; Sung Bin Park; Jong Beum Lee; Hyun Jeong Park; In Ho Chang; Tae-Jin Lee
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 5.  CT and MRI of small renal masses.

Authors:  Zhen J Wang; Antonio C Westphalen; Ronald J Zagoria
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Role of computed tomography features in the differential diagnosis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from oncocytoma and angiomyolipoma without visible fat.

Authors:  Cuiping Zhou; Xiaohua Ban; Jianxun Lv; Lin Cheng; Jianmin Xu; Xinping Shen
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-04

Review 7.  Imaging findings of common benign renal tumors in the era of small renal masses: differential diagnosis from small renal cell carcinoma: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Sungmin Woo; Jeong Yeon Cho
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Stellate scar sign of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Weibin Hou; Guanghua Liu; Zhigang Ji
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2015-09-16

Review 9.  Imaging Characterization of Renal Masses.

Authors:  Carlos Nicolau; Natalie Antunes; Blanca Paño; Carmen Sebastia
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.430

10.  Comparison of computed tomography findings between renal oncocytomas and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Jae Hyeok Choi; Jong Won Kim; Joo Yong Lee; Woong Kyu Han; Koon Ho Rha; Young Deuk Choi; Sung Joon Hong; Young Eun Yoon
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-10-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.