Literature DB >> 23970728

Neck circumference, carotid wall intima-media thickness, and incident stroke.

Klara J Rosenquist, Joseph M Massaro, Karol M Pencina, Ralph B D'Agostino, Alexa Beiser, George T O'Connor, Christopher J O'Donnell, Philip A Wolf, Joseph F Polak, Sudha Seshadri, Caroline S Fox.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23970728      PMCID: PMC3747939          DOI: 10.2337/dc13-0379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


× No keyword cloud information.
Locally acting fat depots may contribute to obesity complications, in particular vascular disease, through direct paracrine effects (1,2). The carotid arteries are encased in fat, and total upper-body subcutaneous fat is estimated by neck circumference (NC). NC has been independently correlated with cardiometabolic risk factors above and beyond that of other adiposity measures (3,4). Carotid wall intima-media thickness (IMT) is a surrogate marker of subclinical atherosclerosis and has been associated with cardiovascular and stroke outcomes (5). The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of NC and carotid wall IMT above and beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors and generalized adiposity. Framingham Heart Study offspring participants who underwent carotid ultrasonography and NC measurements were included (n = 3,274; mean age 59 years; 52% women); NC, internal carotid artery (ICA) IMT, and common carotid artery (CCA) IMT were determined as previously described (4,5). Linear regression models evaluated the association between adiposity exposures and IMT. NC, BMI, and waist circumference were standardized to a mean of 0 and SD of 1 to make the β-coefficients comparable per 1-SD increase of each independent variable. We secondarily adjusted for sleep-disordered breathing from a self-assessment questionnaire. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the longitudinal association between adiposity measures and incident stroke. NC, BMI, and waist were correlated with IMT (Table 1). In multivariable models, a 1-SD increase in NC was associated with a 0.071-mm increase in ICA IMT (P = 0.001), which remained significant after BMI adjustment (P < 0.0001). Neither BMI (P = 0.64) nor waist (P = 0.38) was associated with ICA IMT. The association between NC and ICA was similar and remained significant after adjustment for sleep. Per 1-SD increase in NC, the CCA was 0.025 mm higher (P < 0.001), which remained significant after BMI adjustment (P < 0.001). Significant but smaller associations were observed for BMI and waist, which were attenuated upon additional adjustment for NC. The association between NC and CCA was slightly attenuated (β = 0.017, P = 0.003) but remained significant after adjustment for sleep.
Table 1

Comparison of outcomes based on NC, BMI, and waist circumference among 3,274 participants of the Framingham Heart Study offspring cohort

Comparison of outcomes based on NC, BMI, and waist circumference among 3,274 participants of the Framingham Heart Study offspring cohort NC, BMI, and waist were not associated with incident stroke over 6.1 years of follow-up (n = 147 events); subgroup analysis excluding transient ischemic attacks and evaluating the outcomes by stroke type showed results similar to the primary analysis (data not shown). NC, but neither BMI nor waist, was associated with ICA IMT. CCA IMT is preferentially associated with NC after adjustment for BMI and waist. Finally, NC, BMI, and waist were not associated with incident stroke. Strengths include a well-defined cohort with comprehensive clinical characterization. Some limitations warrant mention. Evaluation of sleep-disordered breathing was based on available data; more robust measures are needed to evaluate this association. The small number of stroke events and relatively short follow-up time may have limited our power. The correlation between NC and volumetric evaluation of upper-body subcutaneous fat has yet to be determined. This study was hypothesis generating and not intended to impact clinical practice. NC is uniquely associated with carotid IMT. Upper-body subcutaneous fat may have a direct pathogenic impact on local vasculature.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Paracrine regulation of vascular tone, inflammation and insulin sensitivity by perivascular adipose tissue.

Authors:  Etto C Eringa; Wineke Bakker; Victor W M van Hinsbergh
Journal:  Vascul Pharmacol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 5.773

2.  Neck circumference as a novel measure of cardiometabolic risk: the Framingham Heart study.

Authors:  Sarah Rosner Preis; Joseph M Massaro; Udo Hoffmann; Ralph B D'Agostino; Daniel Levy; Sander J Robins; James B Meigs; Ramachandran S Vasan; Christopher J O'Donnell; Caroline S Fox
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Carotid-wall intima-media thickness and cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Joseph F Polak; Michael J Pencina; Karol M Pencina; Christopher J O'Donnell; Philip A Wolf; Ralph B D'Agostino
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Periaortic fat deposition is associated with peripheral arterial disease: the Framingham heart study.

Authors:  Caroline S Fox; Joseph M Massaro; Christopher L Schlett; Sam J Lehman; James B Meigs; Christopher J O'Donnell; Udo Hoffmann; Joanne M Murabito
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 7.792

5.  Relationship between neck circumference and cardiometabolic parameters in HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected adults.

Authors:  Kathleen V Fitch; Takara L Stanley; Sara E Looby; Alison M Rope; Steven K Grinspoon
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 19.112

  5 in total
  12 in total

1.  Neck Circumference Is Not Associated with Dysphagia but with Undernutrition in Elderly Individuals Requiring Long-term Care.

Authors:  H Wakabayashi; M Matsushima
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  Upper Body Subcutaneous Fat Is Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors.

Authors:  Jane J Lee; Alison Pedley; Kate E Therkelsen; Udo Hoffmann; Joseph M Massaro; Daniel Levy; Michelle T Long
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Correlations of neck circumference with body composition and cardiometabolic risk factors in Arab women.

Authors:  Reem S Albassam; Kai Y Lei; Abdullah M Alnaami; Nasser M Al-Daghri
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.652

4.  Development and reproducibility of a computed tomography-based measurement for upper body subcutaneous neck fat.

Authors:  Klara J Rosenquist; Kate E Therkelsen; Joseph M Massaro; Udo Hoffmann; Caroline S Fox
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Neck Circumference as a Predictive Indicator of CKD for High Cardiovascular Risk Patients.

Authors:  Ya-Fang Liu; Shih-Tai Chang; Wei-Shiang Lin; Jen-Te Hsu; Chang-Min Chung; Jung-Jung Chang; Kuo-Chun Hung; Kang-Hua Chen; Chi-Wen Chang; Fu-Chi Chen; Yun-Wen Shih; Chi-Ming Chu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Neck Circumference and Incidence of Diabetes Mellitus over 10 Years in the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES).

Authors:  Nam H Cho; Tae Jung Oh; Kyoung Min Kim; Sung Hee Choi; Jae Ho Lee; Kyong Soo Park; Hak Chul Jang; Jong Yeol Kim; Hong Kyu Lee; Soo Lim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Synergistic effects of neck circumference and metabolic risk factors on insulin resistance: the Cardiometabolic Risk in Chinese (CRC) study.

Authors:  Jun Liang; Fei Teng; Xuekui Liu; Caiyan Zou; Yu Wang; Lianjun Dou; Zilin Sun; Lu Qi
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.320

8.  Association of Neck Circumference with Obesity in Female College Students.

Authors:  Dimitrios Papandreou; Zujaja Tul Noor; Maitha Rashed; Hadeel Al Jaberi
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2015-12-06

9.  Waist, neck circumferences, waist-to-hip ratio: Which is the best cardiometabolic risk marker in women with severe obesity? The SOON cohort.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Borel; Sandrine Coumes; Fabian Reche; Stéphane Ruckly; Jean-Louis Pépin; Renaud Tamisier; Nelly Wion; Catherine Arvieux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Incremental significance and sex discrepancies of neck circumference on the odds of ischaemic stroke: a multistage, population-based, cross-sectional study from Northeast China.

Authors:  Shuang Liu; Liying Xing; Guangxiao Li; Ying Li; Li Jing; Yuanmeng Tian; Lei Shi; Cuiqin Jiang; Qun Sun; Guocheng Ren; Dong Dai; Jixu Sun; Weizhong Wang; Weishuang Xue; Zuosen Yang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.