Literature DB >> 23970120

Facility size, race and ethnicity, and mortality for in-center hemodialysis.

Guofen Yan1, Keith C Norris, Wenjun Xin, Jennie Z Ma, Alison J Yu, Tom Greene, Wei Yu, Alfred K Cheung.   

Abstract

The association between dialysis facility size and mortality for patients undergoing hemodialysis remains largely unclear, and whether the relationship differs by race and ethnicity or among high-risk subgroups is not known. Using data from the USRDS, we analyzed mortality rates in 385,074 incident patients ages ≥ 18 years who received in-center hemodialysis at 4633 dialysis facilities between 2003 and 2009. Facilities were categorized by the number of hemodialysis stations (1-5, 6-10, 11-15, 16-20, 21-25, 26-30, 31-35, 36-45, 46-60, and ≥ 61 stations). We found significantly higher mortality associated with facilities comprising ≤ 15 stations, and within this group, mortality increased as the number of stations decreased. The association with increased mortality was weaker for facilities with 16-30 stations, but >30 stations offered no additional survival benefit. The association between increased mortality and facilities with ≤ 15 stations was stronger for racial minorities and patients with diabetes or cardiovascular diseases. After adjustments, blacks had a 78% greater 1-year mortality risk in facilities with one to five stations, whereas whites had only a 26% greater risk. Notably, other patient-related events remained comparable across the categories assessed. In summary, these data suggest that hemodialysis care at small facilities associates with a significant increase in mortality that is only partially explained by measured patient case mix, other well defined facility characteristics, and geographic region. Future studies should investigate differences in processes of care and practices among hemodialysis facilities of different sizes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23970120      PMCID: PMC3839547          DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2013010033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  19 in total

1.  Measuring the efficacy of a quality improvement program in dialysis adequacy with changes in center effects.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Fink; Min Zhan; Steven A Blahut; Michael Soucie; William M McClellan
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 2.  Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature.

Authors:  Ethan A Halm; Clara Lee; Mark R Chassin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  The quality of care. How can it be assessed?

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988 Sep 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Effect of center- versus patient-specific factors on variations in dialysis adequacy.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Fink; Steven A Blahut; Andrew E Briglia; James F Gardner; Paul D Light
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Impact of facility size and profit status on intermediate outcomes in chronic dialysis patients.

Authors:  D L Frankenfield; J R Sugarman; R J Presley; S D Helgerson; M V Rocco
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 8.860

6.  Challenges and opportunities in quantifying the quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: summary from the Acute Myocardial Infarction Working Group of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology First Scientific Forum on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research in Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke.

Authors:  John A Spertus; Martha J Radford; Nathan R Every; Edward F Ellerbeck; Eric D Peterson; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  The effect of dialysis chains on mortality among patients receiving hemodialysis.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Dennis J Cotter; Mae Thamer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Size matters: a meta-analysis on the impact of hospital size on patient mortality.

Authors:  Naleef Fareed
Journal:  Int J Evid Based Healthc       Date:  2012-06

9.  Case mix in end-stage renal disease. Differences between patients in hospital-based and free-standing treatment facilities.

Authors:  A L Plough; S R Salem; M Shwartz; J M Weller; C W Ferguson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Mortality in end-stage renal disease is associated with facility-to-facility differences in adequacy of hemodialysis.

Authors:  W M McClellan; J M Soucie; W D Flanders
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 10.121

View more
  4 in total

1.  Surgical versus medical treatment for infective endocarditis in patients on dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sze-Wen Ting; Jia-Jin Chen; Tao-Han Lee; George Kuo
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 3.222

2.  Association of peripheral arterial disease with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi Yang; Yong Ning; Weifeng Shang; Ran Luo; Lixi Li; Shuiming Guo; Gang Xu; Xiaofeng He; Shuwang Ge
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  Elevated serum alkaline phosphatase and cardiovascular or all-cause mortality risk in dialysis patients: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Fan; Xin Jin; Menglin Jiang; Na Fang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The dialysis facility levels and sizes are associated with outcomes of incident hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  George Kuo; Tao-Han Lee; Jia-Jin Chen; Chieh-Li Yen; Pei-Chun Fan; Cheng-Chia Lee; Chih-Hsiang Chang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.