| Literature DB >> 23969978 |
J S M Alves1, J H Leal-Cardoso, F F U Santos-Júnior, P S Carlos, R C Silva, C M Lucci, S N Báo, V M Ceccatto, R Barbosa.
Abstract
Immobilization, used in clinical practice to treat traumatologic problems, causes changes in muscle, but it is not known whether changes also occur in nerves. We investigated the effects of immobilization on excitability and compound action potential (CAP) and the ultrastructure of the rat sciatic nerve. Fourteen days after immobilization of the right leg of adult male Wistar rats (n=34), animals were killed and the right sciatic nerve was dissected and mounted in a moist chamber. Nerves were stimulated at a baseline frequency of 0.2 Hz and tested for 2 min at 20, 50, and 100 Hz. Immobilization altered nerve excitability. Rheobase and chronaxy changed from 3.13 ± 0.05 V and 52.31 ± 1.95 µs (control group, n=13) to 2.84 ± 0.06 V and 59.71 ± 2.79 µs (immobilized group, n=15), respectively. Immobilization altered the amplitude of CAP waves and decreased the conduction velocity of the first CAP wave (from 93.63 ± 7.49 to 79.14 ± 5.59 m/s) but not of the second wave. Transmission electron microscopy showed fragmentation of the myelin sheath of the sciatic nerve of immobilized limbs and degeneration of the axon. In conclusion, we demonstrated that long-lasting leg immobilization can induce alterations in nerve function.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23969978 PMCID: PMC3854417 DOI: 10.1590/1414-431X20132626
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res ISSN: 0100-879X Impact factor: 2.590
Figure 1Effect of immobilization on compound action potential (CAP) parameters. A and B show representative CAP tracings in control (A) and immobilized (B) rats. C and D show chronaxy (C) and rheobase (D) in control and immobilized rats. E, F, G, and H show conduction velocity of first (E) and second (F) components and positive amplitude of first (G) and second (H) components of CAP at different frequencies in control and immobilized rats. Data are reported as means±SE (n=13 and n=15 for control and immobilized rats, respectively). *P<0.05 control vs immobilized (C and D, non-paired Student t-test; E, F, G and H, at a given frequency, ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test).
Figure 2Electron micrographs of sciatic nerves (SN) from control (A) and immobilized rats (B and C). Note the immobilization-induced degeneration of myelin sheath of large diameter axons (arrows) of immobilized animals (B). Clusters of thin fibers (arrows) can also be seen in the SN of immobilized animals (C). Magnification bars: 2, 2, and 5 µm for A, B, and C, respectively. C: control; IM: immobilized.
Figure 3Frequency distributions of sciatic nerve fiber diameters in 101 fibers from control animals and 204 fibers from experimental animals. *P<0.001, compared to control (chi-square test).