Literature DB >> 10771074

Chronaxie calculated from current-duration and voltage-duration data.

J Holsheimer1, E A Dijkstra, H Demeulemeester, B Nuttin.   

Abstract

To determine the rheobase and the chronaxie of excitable cells from strength-duration curves both constant-current pulses and constant-voltage pulses are applied. Since the complex impedance of the electrode-tissue interface varies with both the pulsewidth and the stimulation voltage, chronaxie values estimated from voltage-duration measurements will differ from the proper values as determined from current-duration measurements. To allow a comparison of chronaxie values obtained by the two stimulation methods, voltage-duration curves were measured in human subjects with a deep brain stimulation electrode implanted, while the current and the load impedance of the stimulation circuit were determined in vitro as a function of both stimulation voltage and pulsewidth. Chronaxie values calculated from voltage-duration data were shown to be 30-40% below those estimated from current-duration data. It was also shown that in the normal range of stimulation amplitudes (up to 7 V) the load impedance increases almost linearly with the pulsewidth. This result led us to present a simple method to convert voltage-duration data into current-duration data, thereby reducing the error in the calculated chronaxie values to approximately 6%. For this purpose voltage-duration data have to be measured for pulses up to 10-20 times the expected chronaxie.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10771074     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0270(00)00163-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  24 in total

1.  Comparison of motor effects following subcortical electrical stimulation through electrodes in the globus pallidus internus and cortical transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Andrea A Kühn; Stephan A Brandt; Andreas Kupsch; Thomas Trottenberg; Jan Brocke; Kerstin Irlbacher; Gerd H Schneider; Bernd-Ulrich Meyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Tissue and electrode capacitance reduce neural activation volumes during deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Christopher R Butson; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Sources and effects of electrode impedance during deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Christopher R Butson; Christopher B Maks; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Chronic intravitreous infusion of ciliary neurotrophic factor modulates electrical retinal stimulation thresholds in the RCS rat.

Authors:  Tiffany L Kent; Inna V Glybina; Gary W Abrams; Raymond Iezzi
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  Selective GABA release as a mechanistic basis of high-frequency stimulation used for the treatment of neuropsychiatric diseases.

Authors:  Thomas J Feuerstein; Miriam Kammerer; Carl Hermann Lücking; Andreas Moser
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Electric field strength and focality in electroconvulsive therapy and magnetic seizure therapy: a finite element simulation study.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Control of myotube contraction using electrical pulse stimulation for bio-actuator.

Authors:  Ken-ichi Yamasaki; Hiroyuki Hayashi; Keiko Nishiyama; Hiroyuki Kobayashi; Sadahito Uto; Hideo Kondo; Shigehiro Hashimoto; Toshia Fujisato
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 1.731

8.  Easy method to examine single nerve fiber excitability and conduction parameters using intact nonanesthetized earthworms.

Authors:  Robert Bähring; Christiane K Bauer
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  Impedance characteristics of deep brain stimulation electrodes in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Xuefeng F Wei; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Experimental and theoretical characterization of the voltage distribution generated by deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Svjetlana Miocinovic; Scott F Lempka; Gary S Russo; Christopher B Maks; Christopher R Butson; Ken E Sakaie; Jerrold L Vitek; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 5.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.