AIM: The aim of this study was to present the preliminary psychometric properties of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool 2.0_General (PAT2.0_GEN), a brief screener for psychosocial risk in families of children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: Caregivers of 42 youth with IBD were recruited and administered a battery of measures including the PAT2.0_GEN and well-validated measures of child emotional and behavioral functioning at baseline and at a 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Internal consistency for the PAT2.0_GEN total score was good (α=0.82). Baseline was significantly associated with the 6-month follow-up (r=0.79, P<0.001). Significant correlations between the baseline PAT2.0 _GEN total score and caregiver-reported Child Behavior Checklist total scores at baseline (r=0.74, P<0.001) and at a 6-month follow-up (r=0.62, P<0.001) support the content and predictive validity of the PAT2.0_GEN. Baseline PAT2.0_GEN was also significantly correlated with youth-reported Child Behavior Checklist total scores at baseline (r=0.37, P=0.02) but not at the 6-month follow-up (r=0.23, P=0.17). CONCLUSIONS: A number of indicators support the concurrent and predictive utility of the PAT2.0_GEN. The PAT2.0_GEN is a promising tool for screening psychosocial risk that could facilitate the provision of psychosocial services to those patients most in need.
AIM: The aim of this study was to present the preliminary psychometric properties of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool 2.0_General (PAT2.0_GEN), a brief screener for psychosocial risk in families of children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: Caregivers of 42 youth with IBD were recruited and administered a battery of measures including the PAT2.0_GEN and well-validated measures of child emotional and behavioral functioning at baseline and at a 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Internal consistency for the PAT2.0_GEN total score was good (α=0.82). Baseline was significantly associated with the 6-month follow-up (r=0.79, P<0.001). Significant correlations between the baseline PAT2.0 _GEN total score and caregiver-reported Child Behavior Checklist total scores at baseline (r=0.74, P<0.001) and at a 6-month follow-up (r=0.62, P<0.001) support the content and predictive validity of the PAT2.0_GEN. Baseline PAT2.0_GEN was also significantly correlated with youth-reported Child Behavior Checklist total scores at baseline (r=0.37, P=0.02) but not at the 6-month follow-up (r=0.23, P=0.17). CONCLUSIONS: A number of indicators support the concurrent and predictive utility of the PAT2.0_GEN. The PAT2.0_GEN is a promising tool for screening psychosocial risk that could facilitate the provision of psychosocial services to those patients most in need.
Authors: Avani C Modi; Ahna L Pai; Kevin A Hommel; Korey K Hood; Sandra Cortina; Marisa E Hilliard; Shanna M Guilfoyle; Wendy N Gray; Dennis Drotar Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: P Burke; V Meyer; S Kocoshis; D M Orenstein; R Chandra; D J Nord; J Sauer; E Cohen Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1989-11 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Eva Szigethy; Anna Levy-Warren; Sarah Whitton; Athos Bousvaros; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Alan M Leichtner; William R Beardslee Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Thao-Ly T Phan; Fang Fang Chen; Alison Taggi Pinto; Courtney Cox; Jennifer Robbins; Anne E Kazak Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: M C McCarthy; S DeGraves; C E Wakefield; M J Bowden; L V Marks; L K Williams Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Steven K Reader; Colleen N Keeler; Fang Fang Chen; Nicole M Ruppe; Diana L Rash-Ellis; Jean R Wadman; Robin E Miller; Anne E Kazak Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2020-05-01
Authors: Sasja A Schepers; Simone M Sint Nicolaas; Heleen Maurice-Stam; Elisabeth M van Dijk-Lokkart; Esther M M van den Bergh; Nienke de Boer; Chris M Verhaak; Martha A Grootenhuis Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Chiara Colliva; Monica Cellini; Francesca Dalla Porta; Martina Ferrari; Barbara Maria Bergamini; Azzurra Guerra; Silvia Di Giuseppe; Annamaria Pinto; Roberto Capasso; Daniela Caprino; Marta Ferrari; Cristina Benatti; Fabio Tascedda; Johanna M C Blom Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-23 Impact factor: 3.240