C-W Lee1, C-Y Yang, Y-F Chen, A Huang, Y-H Wang, H-M Liu. 1. From the Department of Medical Imaging and Radiology (C.-W.L., C.-Y.Y., Y.-F.C., Y.-H.W., H.-M.L.), Hospital and Medical College, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Carotid blowout is a serious late complication of prior treatment of advanced head and neck cancer. We evaluate the efficacy of CTA in the diagnosis of impending carotid blowout syndrome in patients with head and neck cancer, and its capability to predict clinical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical data of 29 patients with impending carotid blowout who underwent CTA were collected and analyzed. Imaging signs included tissue necrosis, exposed artery, viable perivascular tumor, pseudoaneurysm, and contrast extravasation. DSA was obtained in 20 patients. One-year outcomes were compared based on management. RESULTS: The most common CTA finding was necrosis (94%), followed by exposed artery (73%), viable tumor (67%), pseudoaneurysm (58%), and contrast extravasation (30%). Exposed artery, pseudoaneurysm, and contrast extravasation were the 3 CTA findings related to outcomes. All of the pseudoaneurysm and contrast extravasation cases were associated with an exposed artery. An exposed artery was the most important prognostic predictor and could not be diagnosed on DSA. Patients without the 3 findings on CTA (group 1) had the best survival rate at 1-year follow-up, followed by patients with the 3 findings treated immediately by permanent artery occlusion (group 2). Patients with the 3 findings who had no immediate treatment (group 3) had the worst outcomes (P < .001 in group 1 vs group 3 and group 2 vs group 3; P = .056 group 1 vs group 2). CONCLUSIONS: CTA, with its ability to diagnose an exposed artery compared with DSA, may offer important management and prognostic information in patients with impending carotid blowout.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Carotid blowout is a serious late complication of prior treatment of advanced head and neck cancer. We evaluate the efficacy of CTA in the diagnosis of impending carotid blowout syndrome in patients with head and neck cancer, and its capability to predict clinical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical data of 29 patients with impending carotid blowout who underwent CTA were collected and analyzed. Imaging signs included tissue necrosis, exposed artery, viable perivascular tumor, pseudoaneurysm, and contrast extravasation. DSA was obtained in 20 patients. One-year outcomes were compared based on management. RESULTS: The most common CTA finding was necrosis (94%), followed by exposed artery (73%), viable tumor (67%), pseudoaneurysm (58%), and contrast extravasation (30%). Exposed artery, pseudoaneurysm, and contrast extravasation were the 3 CTA findings related to outcomes. All of the pseudoaneurysm and contrast extravasation cases were associated with an exposed artery. An exposed artery was the most important prognostic predictor and could not be diagnosed on DSA. Patients without the 3 findings on CTA (group 1) had the best survival rate at 1-year follow-up, followed by patients with the 3 findings treated immediately by permanent artery occlusion (group 2). Patients with the 3 findings who had no immediate treatment (group 3) had the worst outcomes (P < .001 in group 1 vs group 3 and group 2 vs group 3; P = .056 group 1 vs group 2). CONCLUSIONS:CTA, with its ability to diagnose an exposed artery compared with DSA, may offer important management and prognostic information in patients with impending carotid blowout.
Authors: Andrew M Demchuk; Dar Dowlatshahi; David Rodriguez-Luna; Carlos A Molina; Yolanda Silva Blas; Imanuel Dzialowski; Adam Kobayashi; Jean-Martin Boulanger; Cheemun Lum; Gord Gubitz; Vasantha Padma; Jayanta Roy; Carlos S Kase; Jayme Kosior; Rohit Bhatia; Sarah Tymchuk; Suresh Subramaniam; David J Gladstone; Michael D Hill; Richard I Aviv Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: J N Goldstein; L E Fazen; R Snider; K Schwab; S M Greenberg; E E Smith; M H Lev; J Rosand Journal: Neurology Date: 2007-03-20 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: J M Mathis; J D Barr; C A Jungreis; H Yonas; L N Sekhar; D Vincent; S L Pentheny; J A Horton Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1995-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: J C Chaloupka; T C Roth; C M Putman; S Mitra; D A Ross; R A Lowlicht; C T Sasaki Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1999 Jun-Jul Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Carlos Suárez; Verónica Fernández-Alvarez; Marc Hamoir; William M Mendenhall; Primoz Strojan; Miquel Quer; Carl E Silver; Juan P Rodrigo; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 3.989