Literature DB >> 10445446

Recurrent carotid blowout syndrome: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in a newly recognized subgroup of patients.

J C Chaloupka1, T C Roth, C M Putman, S Mitra, D A Ross, R A Lowlicht, C T Sasaki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To our knowledge, recurrent carotid blowout syndrome (rCBS) has not been well described. Our purpose was to review our institution's recent experience with patients who presented with multiple episodes of carotid blowout syndrome (CBS), and who were referred for emergent diagnostic angiography and endovascular therapy.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the last 46 consecutive patients who had a clinical diagnosis of CBS. All patients were examined and treated prospectively according to a standardized protocol. Most patients (43 of 46) had undergone extensive primary and salvage radical surgery with intraoperative brachytherapy or external beam radiation or both. The remaining three patients had either traumatic or iatrogenic CBS.
RESULTS: Twelve patients (26%) in our series had more than one episode of CBS in which a total of 32 (20 recurrent) events were observed (average 2.7, range 2-4). Intervals of rCBS ranged from 1 day to 6 years. Thirteen (65%) of 20 recurrent events were attributed to progressive disease (PD), and seven (35%) of 20 to treatment failures (TFs). In the PD group, seven (54%) of 13 had recurrent ipsilateral disease, and six (46%) of 13 had recurrent contralateral disease. Etiologies of rCBS were as follows: seven exposed carotids; seven carotid pseudoaneurysms; eight small-branch pseudoaneurysms; five tumor hemorrhages; three hyperemic/ulcerated wounds; and one aortic arch rupture. Twenty-seven of 32 events were treated with endovascular therapy, which included the following: nine carotid occlusions; 11 small-branch embolizations; three transarterial tumor embolizations; one carotid stent; and two direct-puncture embolizations. Four of six TFs were retreated successfully with endovascular therapy; the remaining two TFs were managed successfully by surgery. In the PD group, hemorrhagic complications of rCBS were managed successfully in all but one patient, who died. No permanent neurologic or ophthalmologic complications occurred.
CONCLUSION: Recurrent CBS is a frequently encountered problem in which most cases are caused by PD resulting from both multifocal iatrogenic arteriopathy and occasional wound complications that are characteristic of aggressively managed head and neck surgical patients. Initial TFs are encountered often as well. Despite the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of rCBS, most cases can be retreated effectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10445446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  26 in total

1.  Treatment of ruptured ICA during transsphenoidal surgery. Two different endovascular strategies in two cases.

Authors:  S B Ghatge; D B Modi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  A novel approach to the management of carotid blowout syndrome: the use of thrombin in a case of failed covered stenting.

Authors:  Naveen Sablani; Gary Jain; Maryam Mumtaz Hasan; Keithan Sivakumar; Solomon Feuerwerker; Karthikeyan Arcot; Jeffrey Farkas
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2016-02-24

Review 3.  The expanding role of interventional radiology in head and neck surgery.

Authors:  Stephen Broomfield; Iain Bruce; Andrew Birzgalis; Amit Herwadkar
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Interventional neuroradiology of the head and neck.

Authors:  D Gandhi; J J Gemmete; S A Ansari; S K Gujar; S K Mukherji
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Amplatzer vascular plug for occlusion of parent artery in carotid blowout with active extravasation.

Authors:  J J S Shankar; W J Maloney; R Vandorpe
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 1.610

6.  Outcomes of interventions for carotid blowout syndrome in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Nathan L Liang; Brian D Guedes; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Michael J Singh; Rabih A Chaer; Michel S Makaroun; Ulka Sachdev
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Carotid blowout syndrome in patients with head-and-neck cancers: reconstructive management by self-expandable stent-grafts.

Authors:  F-C Chang; J-F Lirng; C-B Luo; W-Y Guo; M M H Teng; S-K Tai; C-Y Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Verification of bleeding points in carotid blowout syndrome using guidewire manipulation.

Authors:  Chao-Bao Luo; Yuang-Seng Tsuei; Feng-Chi Chang; Ta-Wei Ting
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Procedure-induced acute common carotid artery perforation presenting with airway obstruction and successful treatment by endovascular stent graft.

Authors:  Chang Hoon Lee; Jong Seon Park; Ki Won Hwang; Seung-Whan Lee; Seong-Wook Park; Seung-Jung Park
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 3.243

10.  Rapid, sequential bilateral acute carotid blowout syndrome.

Authors:  Hon-Man Liu; Chung-Yi Yang; Chung-Wei Lee; Yao-Hung Wang; Ya-Fang Chen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.